You can't force people to do something they don't want. Like, you know, not everybody wants to develop a Fallout game. Not to mention teams have their own roadmaps and stuff.I can't believe that Microsoft can't form a team from scratch to make a Fallout game. You can't seriously be telling me every single employee at Xbox are too busy? i understand Bethesda and Obsidian are out, but that shouldn't stop Microsoft if they want to cobble a team together. Yes, it still will take 4-5 years, but at this point starting is better than not starting.
Well people were complaining about how Valve couldn't find people to make Half Life 3. But outside Valve many other studios DO force employees to make games they don't want to make.You can't force people to do something they don't want. Like, you know, not everybody wants to develop a Fallout game. Not to mention teams have their own roadmaps and stuff.
Breaking news at 11!
major game publishers want sequels to extremely popular series to be made quicker
Also news: Nintendo wants the next Zelda to be made faster and sell just as many copies as breath of the wild. Source: myself.
Bethesda can keep working on ES6 (and to me, if they fuck it that up as well, they should just close up shop). Fallout should be in the hands of Obsidian and inXile.My god, don’t delay ESVI anymore please. We already have 3 large Fallout games since Skyrim. Elder Scrolls fans are just living on ESO life support.
I don’t think I trust modern Obsidian especially in terms of writing. They need to bring Josh Sawyer and Chris Avellone back for me actually be excited for a Fallout from them. Everything comes down to how Avowed will pan out. I have more faith in inXile but if we’re going that route, might as well hire Larian.Bethesda can keep working on ES6 (and to me, if they fuck it that up as well, they should just close up shop). Fallout should be in the hands of Obsidian and inXile.
Huh. I kinda want to see what they'd do with the Fallout IP now.might as well hire Larian.
To be clear they only started doing that during the Switch era. They were just as desperate as everyone else for their big games to be done and ready to release prior to 2018. And a lot of that has to do with only having one system to support instead of two. But it’s certainly a nice position to be in, we’ll see how long it lasts as game dev cycles even at Nintendo get longer and longer. And it’s not every game that they do this with, only some.IMO Nintendo doesn't even release a game when it's ready, they hold it until they feel like releasing it. They already tactically release games to maximize sales so I doubt they wish they could make more, they know if they spammed them out it would no longer be as hyped or get as much return on investment per game.
5 or 6 seasons?? Shows don’t really go that long any more. Even if this one does, with production cycles being like film schedules now, that would be 15 years from now by the time the show finished.no pressure then to make sure the next 5 or 6 seasons of the fallout show work and are enjoyable to keep the momentum going & interest from the general public to buy the next game. deffo in the meantime they could revmp the other titles also can we take the need away for a subscription for 76 to open it up to more people.
Well, they did just release a new Fallout 76 expansion, and Fallout 76 numbers are up. Fallout 76's player numbers are up +285% on Steam and the game has bumped up to #19 on the Microsoft charts.
unless the development started few years ago, theres no way it can catch up with the upcoming season show
It certainly helps that Sony have an established infrastructure they can rely on: Sony Pictures.Again, this is why people don't praise Sony enough on this.
They created a production studio JUST to keep their IP at the forefront and aligned with their game development.
Specifically, so that they don't have a situation like this, where they failed to maximize the potential of their IP.
It'll be 3-4 years at the earliest before they can get a Fallout game out and it would be rushed beyond belief since it hasn't been started yet. On top of that it would need to be made by a different studio in tandem with Bethesda since they're working on Elder's Scrolls. So maybe you delay Elder Scrolls entirely... which is also a mistake...
In 3-4 years no one is going to care about this Fallout show. Does anyone care about The Witcher now?
People keep asking why Sony is remaking games, when it is much easier/faster to remake a game and have it ready for consumption to a new audience from TV/Movies.
A remade or remastered Fallout 4 would be selling gangbusters right now at full price. When The Last of Us Season 2 comes out, they're going to have 2 nearly full priced games available for purchase on both PS5 and PC rather than the ps4 game for 20 dollars.
It certainly helps that Sony have an established infrastructure they can rely on: Sony Pictures.
There were rumors of Oblivion and Fallout 3 remasters being in development. I believe they were accidentally leaked by Microsoft themselves on their trial with FTC. They're probably still coming. Virtuos were associated with Oblivion's remaster and I wouldn't be surprised if Fallout 3 would also be done by them too providing Oblivion is indeed their projectThey are leaving money on the table not getting a PS4 version of FO3 and New Vegas out for like $20 each like how Rockstar put out RDR last year, so the current install base can buy it.
Calm the fuck down, dude. I just mentioned that it certainly helped that they have Sony Pictures.I mean that isn't much of an excuse, nor would that have changed anything in this situation.
Bethesda made this deal with Amazon well before the purchase even happened, and they just never planned on having a game ready for it.
Microsoft similarly erred when it came to the Halo TV series. They could partner with any studio they want, that's not going to change anything. At best Sony has less difficulty in their timeline because they probably aren't shopping around for distributors generally, at least when it comes to movies. The've still needed to shop their tv shows to different networks/streamers.
Bottom line that's a copout.
And the difference in strategy is really going to show itself over the next 3-5 years.
compared to what Sony has already done with
- The Last of Us Season 2
- Until Dawn
- Ghost of Tsushima
- Twisted Metal Season 2
- Uncharted 2
- Day's Gone
- Gravity Rush
- God of War
- Horizon
- The Last of Us Season 1
- Uncharted 1
- Twisted Metal Season 1
- Gran Turismo
Sony is trying to position PlayStation in being the next Marvel, whereas Microsoft has no clue. They're two decades behind on game development and a decade behind on transmedia.
Obsidian did New Vegas in 18 months and look how it turned out, still the highest regarded Fallout, so it doesn't need to take 5 or Bethesda's 10 to 20 years.
TRANSMEDIA.Calm the fuck down, dude. I just mentioned that it certainly helped that they have Sony Pictures.
Yeah, it was a different world, they also released New Vegas in the same 5 years, they didn't make it, but Bethesda released it, 4 games in 5 years, to what we get now!.Yes a lifetime ago. In the same period, Bethesda released Oblivion, Fallout 3 and Skyrim in the span of 5 years. Different world.
Back in the day when games take 2 years to make, it made sense to rotate between TES and Fallout games.Hahaha Fallout 5 will be a 2035-2040 release on the playstation7 or playstation 8.
If microsoft wants fallout games, it needs to rip it from the hands of Todd Howard. Oh by the way, the company obtained rights to fallout in 2020, in 2021 microsoft bought bethesda... we could have had a fallout game ready, as long as Todd Howard wasn't involved.
I'm not saying Todd is a bad person or a bad developer. It's just that he's bottlenecking Bethesda output.
Maybe a Jak & Daxter movie or series could work. Since Naughty Dog are unwilling and frankly unable to do a new Jak & Daxter game anyway.TRANSMEDIA.
Trying to position Playstation as the next Marvel is hilarious when Sony doesn't have anything comparably or potentially as interesting.
Twisted Metal... Gran Turismo..
Are we talking original Intel Centrino 2 Core-i5 that were all mobile Core-Duos (two core, four thread, etc) or a modern day Core-i5 mobile that is a scaled back desktop i5? If the former, then the CPU could easily be the bottleneck, especially if it is single channel memory setup, and if the SpeedStep base clock of the CPU is less than the PS3/360 3.2GHz clock.The Steam and GOG versions are probably better since you can mod them to hell and back.
I tried the GP version and it was such a stuttery mess on my laptop that I ended up playing it on the Xbox with its FPS boost. I was trying the GP PC version on a 1060 laptop with an i5 and 16GB RAM, which shouldn't have problems with this at all.
Are we talking original Intel Centrino 2 Core-i5 that were all mobile Core-Duos (two core, four thread, etc) or a modern day Core-i5 mobile that is a scaled back desktop i5? If the former, then the CPU could easily be the bottleneck, especially if it is single channel memory setup, and if the SpeedStep base clock of the CPU is less than the PS3/360 3.2GHz clock.
But the PS4 and Pro were a step backwards on the CPU side; especially with single core clock which Bethesda games rely on, and even needed games like Journey rewritten to accommodate the difference. It isn't beyond the realms of possibility you're getting that gaming experience with a dual core cpu and the GPU is doing all the heavy lifting for you, as a mobile 1060 is still a pretty decent chip at today's aging higher end,It's a fairly modern one which runs ps4 era games at 60 fps with higher than Pro settings.
But the PS4 and Pro were a step backwards on the CPU side; especially with single core clock which Bethesda games rely on, and even needed games like Journey rewritten to accommodate the difference. It isn't beyond the realms of possibility you're getting that gaming experience with a dual core cpu and the GPU is doing all the heavy lifting for you, as a mobile 1060 is still a pretty decent chip at today's aging higher end,
Yeah, no worries, just for anyone else with something needing more than dual core, you can see these two mobile core-i5 7th gens are dual core at 2.8Ghz and 2.7Ghz so a single core clock bottleneck could be an issue in some games, despite a 1060 mobile.It's a 7th gen i5 to be more specific, like I said, I run much more modern games without any issue. I've played FO4 on the same laptop.
This is a very specific game issue, and if it's something the unofficial patch-style-mods can fix, I can't use those on the PC Game Pass version anyway
But it's ok, I'm having a fun time with the game on the console, the FPS boost is extremely smooth.
I mean Obsidian is making Outer Worlds 2. Change that into Fallout 2799 or something, aka Fallout in Space!Swap in a few assets.
Fallout: Avowed.
Done.
Yeah, no worries, just for anyone else with something needing more than dual core, you can see these two mobile core-i5 7th gens are dual core at 2.8Ghz and 2.7Ghz so a single core clock bottleneck could be an issue in some games, despite a 1060 mobile.
Intel® Core™ i7-7600U Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.90 GHz) - Product Specifications | Intel
Intel® Core™ i7-7600U Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.90 GHz) quick reference with specifications, features, and technologies.ark.intel.com
Intel® Core™ i7-7500U Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz ) - Product Specifications | Intel
Intel® Core™ i7-7500U Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz ) quick reference with specifications, features, and technologies.ark.intel.com