Definitely considering this phone, I assume the build quality should be better than the S3? How about the UI skin over android? how does Sony's tack up against Samsung's Touchwiz?
Website like the verge or phonearena call the V a mid-range phone. I mean seriously...
I completely agree though. My Arc S was way better optimised and ran so much better than my new Motorola RAZR which has 2 cores and twice as much RAM.
It's the same story for the display. Sony isn't on the AMOLED bandwago but look at the comparison in the OP, their screens are actually better. I can attest to this by comparing my RAZR and my brother's Arc S. It's also a weakness of their marketing I guess. If they called the Xperia S's screen with 342 ppi something cool like Retina, maybe then the journalists and public would swallow it up.
Huh? I thought S was generally well received?
Definitely considering this phone, I assume the build quality should be better than the S3? How about the UI skin over android? how does Sony's tack up against Samsung's Touchwiz?
What clusterfuck?After the Xperia S clusterfuck I ended up with I'll never get a Sony phone again.
Huh? I thought S was generally well received?
Yellow tint on parts of the screen, screen less responsive than previous iPhone 3GS and current Galaxy S3, non-removable battery with shitty battery life, flimsy plastic creaking battery cover, creaking front screen around the middle capacitive button if a little pressure is applied to it, unresponsive capacitive dots, camera had trouble focusing even though software claimed it had and took a blurry picture, camera is really bad in low-light conditions.What clusterfuck?
Yellow tint on parts of the screen, screen less responsive than previous iPhone 3GS and current Galaxy S3, non-removable battery with shitty battery life, flimsy plastic creaking battery cover, creaking front screen around the middle capacitive button if a little pressure is applied to it, unresponsive capacitive dots, camera had trouble focusing even though software claimed it had and took a blurry picture, camera is really bad in low-light conditions.
Could have been extremely unlucky but I've never been that displeased with any other phone (and I've even had a Windows Mobile 6 phone)
Yellow tint on parts of the screen, screen less responsive than previous iPhone 3GS and current Galaxy S3, non-removable battery with shitty battery life, flimsy plastic creaking battery cover, creaking front screen around the middle capacitive button if a little pressure is applied to it, unresponsive capacitive dots, camera had trouble focusing even though software claimed it had and took a blurry picture, camera is really bad in low-light conditions.
Could have been extremely unlucky but I've never been that displeased with any other phone (and I've even had a Windows Mobile 6 phone)
I'm still holding my breath on the next Google Nexus phone being made by Sony. I have no doubt it will be the most awesomest phone ever.
Sony, Nokia, and Apple are the only major players capable of making beautiful designs.
I really wish Sony starts getting major attention in the mobile space. Their phones are amazingly designed, hell, Apple even sighted them (the Arc S) as examples of original design in their Samsung case.
I honestly have never held a One X, but I do think it's a nice design.Galaxy Nexus and HTX One X disagree.
god damn it, dude!!!!Don't count on one. Sony would not be able to bundle all of their software with a Nexus. No Walkman app, no Album app, no PS-Mobile etc... Sony like Android because they can push their services over it but Google won't allow them to do that with a Nexus.
Galaxy Nexus and HTX One X disagree.
http://recombu.com/mobile/reviews/sony/xperia-t/
Just read the review. Summary is its great phone with small battery time
Judging by the length of this thread lioks like sony will have hard time becoming top contender in mobile phone space
Sony make nice phones for sure, but they need to start sticking higher capacity batteries in their phones.
I get about 4.5 hours of screen on time with my current XS over a 12 hour day, Sony needs to get at least 8 hours of screen on time (at a reasonable brightness level) for me to consider getting another one of their phones.
What clusterfuck?
My sister has nothing but praise for xperia uI have got an xperia s and it's flawless. Really good as my mates i[hone 4s
Where the fuck is the android playstation store?
and xperia play 2?!
i feel rage.....
I dont think battery issue is exclusive to xperias. My note and 3gs have also absymal batteries. Specaily note it barely lasts half a day.
http://recombu.com/mobile/reviews/sony/xperia-t/
Just read the review. Summary is its great phone with small battery time
Judging by the length of this thread lioks like sony will have hard time becoming top contender in mobile phone space
Where the fuck is the android playstation store?
and xperia play 2?!
i feel rage.....
I dont think battery issue is exclusive to xperias. My note and 3gs have also absymal batteries. Specaily note it barely lasts half a day.
Yup, Samsung got it right with the S3, they stuck a massive 2100mAh battery in it, Sony should have done the same with the T.
I have it and a lot of my friends have it -> it's amazing!Huh? I thought S was generally well received?
Engadget in my eyes is the trash of tech blogs, reading their other reviews they will never concluded with "It's difficult to pin any major improvements or innovations that the Xperia T brings to phone buyers". As if the other phones bring any major innovations, why even mention that?
Engadget in my eyes is the trash of tech blogs, reading their other reviews they will never concluded with "It's difficult to pin any major improvements or innovations that the Xperia T brings to phone buyers". As if the other phones bring any major innovations, why even mention that?
Engadget in my eyes is the trash of tech blogs, reading their other reviews they will never concluded with "It's difficult to pin any major improvements or innovations that the Xperia T brings to phone buyers". As if the other phones bring any major innovations, why even mention that?
Because Engadget thinks the iPhone is innovative every time.
After reading the iPhone 5 review from Engadget, I can't take them seriously. That kind of line thrown at the bottom of the T review is such a stupid thing to say, especially after that absolutely ridiculous iPhone review.
But, with a software update now readily available on that older phone (we refreshed the older phone with the latest software to compare in this review) it's difficult to pin any major improvements or innovations that the Xperia T brings to phone buyers.
Ok used the xperia T for sometime. If some body wants to ask something then ill be happy to answer