Support NeoGAF

[SJRB]

 

[Herr Edgy]

Oh fuck oh shit oh fuck

 

[diffusionx]

They look identical.

 

[Kilau]

Almost as good as the GOAT "logo" change.

 

[Cyberpunkd]

They look identical.

I think the new one reflects their brand identity much, much better!

 

[Hudo]

This is one of the worst redesigns I have ever seen.

 

[jufonuk]

Someone somewhere is making bank off of that design change. Why? because they know how to spin it.

 

[KyoZz]

And it probably cost 100 million dollars

 

[Yoshichan]

are people who are saying there's no difference intentionally dumb or what? there's a difference. big one in fact?

 

[Alebrije]

Does the background colors are part of the new logo?

 

[12Goblins]

are people who are saying there's no difference intentionally dumb or what? there's a difference. big one in fact?

For the record I did try to click on the logo thinking it was an embedded video to play

 

[rm082e]

So does this mean it's gay, or AI?

 

[mitch1971]

 

[Cyberpunkd]

So does this mean it's gay, or AI?

 

[IAmRei]

What? This super subtle...
But... Why...?

Pale pink and pale green is out of place tho
Unless they mean CA alike

But why?

 

[Tajaz2426]

Must have made it a woman and made it gay. It worked.

 

[winjer]

Someone got paid to do that....

 

[Bojji]

I won't recognize it anymore

 

[MudoSkills]

'AI will never be good enough to fully replace creative industries.'

 

[Kilau]

are people who are saying there's no difference intentionally dumb or what? there's a difference. big one in fact?

Oh my god...

 

[ahtlas7]

needs more resolution.

 

[T4keD0wN]

How is it possible that the only person on this planet thats capable of noticing ended up messing up and tweeting out the same picture twice?

 

[DeepEnigma]

Pastel shit clashing with solid primary red tone.

Just hang a banana on a wall and call it a day.

 

[violence]

There's more pink in YouTube now.

 

[Dazraell]

 

[TheInfamousKira]

Holy shit, holographic YouTube.

Now we just need megas and shinies.

 

[kevboard]

ones like that actually make sense when you think about the current way these logos are used. often in icons on tiny phone screens.

spacing the squares out more to avoid them looking too crammed into eachother on a 144x144 pixel phone icon (or smaller depending on screen)
or how Walmart made their "spark" logo thicker and more rounded while also increasing the saturation to stand out more.
these things will make it look better in tiny icon sizes.

 

[NeoIkaruGAF]

We got to post 28 without theyrethesamepicture.jpg?
This took more effort than that "redesign".

 

[Dr. Samuel Hayden]

Youtube's always had a huge boner for making stupid, pointless changes

 

[ForAcademicPurposes]

Bring back Frutiger Aero gummy bears

 

[Fake]

Wow.

Imagine being payed for this drastic change.

 

[Carmen Winstead]

YouTube logo got bisexual lighting now.

 

[Trilobit]

Never forget:

 

[FeralEcho]

 

[FeralEcho]

are people who are saying there's no difference intentionally dumb or what? there's a difference. big one in fact?

I agree,raised lettering, pale nimbus, look at that subtle colouring. The tasteful thickness. Impressive.

Oh my God. It even has a watermark.

Spoiler

[\SPOILER]

 

[Audiophile]

I think this better conveys synergy and vertical integration.

With this change the customer will know that the brand is working for them.

Also, something about the environment.

 

[AJUMP23]

Looks lame.

 

[GymWolf]

Now update your codecs or whatever, the experience has been terrible for the past couple of months...

 

[Pagusas]

Never forget:

$500,000 change.

 

[Audiophile]

Never forget:

Tbf, this is the sort of thing I'd agonise over. The after is much better.

 

[Magic Carpet]

Got and ad before I got a look at the logo.

 

[EverydayBeast]

 

[ThatStupidLion]

This cost so much time money and man hours - the numbers would make your ears bleed and small gdp nations cry

 

[HoodWinked]

apparently it's to distinguish itself from Youtube Creators.