• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Zelda in November?

Ganondorf>Link said:
I doubt they would go with cel-shading but perhaps some drastic change went on. Have they fucked with the gameplay, is the story no longer dark, no more Wolf Link, no more Adult Link, etc,. Are things that worry me.
Click to expand...

You're right. I wonder if they've changed the character models again. The first time Zelda was shown, Link looked pretty sweet. But at E3 imo he looked different and more feminine (but still cool). I wonder if they've reversed this.

I doubt they've totally changed the story to make it less dark. Not too long ago one of the game's producers told NP that it was going to be sad or something (hence the Zelda rape theories :lol ).

I want to see:

-First Link model brought back
-Orchastrated music
-Fixed animations (IE Link's shuffling feet)

Those are the only "improvements" I'd like to see really. The game looked stunning at E3 despite the minor issues.
 
You're right. I wonder if they've changed the character models again. The first time Zelda was shown, Link looked pretty sweet. But at E3 imo he looked different and more feminine (but still cool). I wonder if they've reversed this.
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about? They look exactly the same.
 
Leondexter said:
I'm not seeing a difference there. Are you the guy who said they'd made his feet smaller?
Click to expand...

I don't see any difference either. And that was Olimario, I believe.
 
E3 2004 Link

zeldae3.jpg
the-legend-of-zelda-gcn-200405110014066.jpg


E3 2005 Link

bouye8lg.jpg
zelda-poste3-17.JPG
 
the-legend-of-zelda-gcn-200405110014066.jpg


that's one of the cooler versions of Link.


so Twilight Princess is April? OMG OMG please be true. just get the Gamecube elements right and save all the Revolution control functions for the true Revolution Zelda.
 
I don't know. Still don't see a substantial difference. MAYBE the hair did look a bit nicer in the 2004 build.
 
PhoenixDark said:
Exactly

He looked cooler/harder in the 2004 trailer.
Click to expand...

Thats because all they showed was him angry in that trailer. The pictures I posted were him smiling, because they simply didn't show the angry side of him in the E3 demo.
 
hmmm Matt says no Zelda release in the first half of 2006


Where is Zelda?

Hey Matt/Mark,

I know this is a GameCube question, but being that the GC is practically gone and with all of the Revolution controller functionality being rumored for it, where in the name of the Triforce is Zelda: TP? Do you have any info on when we might expect a release date announcement? In your opinion, is Zelda: TP is headed for a Q4 '06 release?

Peace,

PSX5K

Matt responds: You've got a wait ahead of you. Twilight Princess isn't coming in the first half of 2006, as you might have already guessed. But worse, some people who pre-ordered the game have received e-mails informing them of a November 2006 ship date. Whether or not this will ultimately happen is still up in the air - it'd be highly suspect of Nintendo to release both the new Zelda and Revolution in the same month. Then again, if the game really uses the innovative new controller on Revolution - and it probably does - perhaps the Big N is positioning the game's release as a means to sell its new platform while still satisfying GameCube owners.
Click to expand...
 
Why not use some basic common sense in terms of business?

This is probably the most expensive game Nintendo has ever developed. It's also likely the biggest software release of 2006 period.

Why should they piss it away on a dead platform during the slow months of spring?

As for those bitching and moaning about a few extra months ... gimme a break. Nintendo now pumps out a ton of Zelda games all the time these days. It's not like waiting six and a half years in between Zelda: LttP on SNES and Zelda: OoT on N64.

*That* was a wait, this is nothing. We've gotten FOUR Zelda games since 1998 (OoT, Majora's Mask, Wind Waker, Twilight Princess ... I guess you could count Four Swords Adventures too and make it 5) versus one Mario game (Sunshine) during that same time span.

Zelda fans should shut the hell up IMO. Nintendo's 100% doing the smart thing here. You can never have enough good software to help buoy a new platform ... Jump Superstars and Mario Kart DS may not use the DS extra functionality in any special ways, but they've helped fill out the library and made a good mix of all-around software for everyone. Zelda: TP can do the same with the Rev launch.

People always want a big, "epic" kind of AAA game at a system launch ... the GameCube didn't have it and suffered for it ... Zelda: TP can automatically give the Revolution that right from day 1.
 
If its going to be a Rev launch title, 3rd parties are screwed. Having Mario and Zelda at launch is insane, plus whatever the new IP is, and the chance of getting Smash Bros. 3 at or near launch is just going to steal all the sales from 3rd party games.
 
I would not be entirely shocked if Smash Bros. is delayed to 2007.

It seems like they really didn't start working on this game until last summer, and if they're just doing a quickie sequel/upgrade ... why would Sakurai be interested in directing it again? Didn't he leave Nintendo because he wanted to get away from that?
 
Ganondorf>Link said:
If its going to be a Rev launch title, 3rd parties are screwed. Having Mario and Zelda at launch is insane, plus whatever the new IP is, and the chance of getting Smash Bros. 3 at or near launch is just going to steal all the sales from 3rd party games.
Click to expand...

Sadly QFT. Releasing the game a week or two before the Revolution could at least try to avoid that problem. It would still happen probably though.

I'm thinking Nintendo is going to have Mario and Metroid Prime 3 ready for launch. They'll also have a new IP aimed at non gamers (Miyamoto's new game more than likely). But that's still some heavy first party support.
 
SSB will not appear on the Rev at launch unless Nintendo decides to release a half assed version or doubles the development team size.
 
Yeah I'm expecting Smash to be delayed into 2007, but still there is a chance that it may make it out in 2006. Still though, having Zelda and Mario plus the new IP at launch is going to steal of ton of sales from 3rd party games.
 
I'm thinking a summer release would be perfect for this game. It still gives Nintendo a few months to polish it up, and it'll give the GameCube a bit more life until the Revolution releases (assuming it's a 2006 console).
 
Error2k4 said:
am I blind or something... looks the same to me.
Click to expand...

Exactly, there is almost no difference between them. In fact I'd say the E3 2005 model looks better because the green tunic doesn't look as drab as the one in the E3 2004 Trailer.
 
PhoenixDark said:
Exactly

He looked cooler/harder in the 2004 trailer.
Click to expand...

The only difference are the facial Expression. I'm happy that they didn't get rid of facial expressions when they made the game all mature. Since facial expressions were a major addition to Wind Waker and all.
 
I just want a permanent release date and no bullshit. When it was announced that this game would be delayed until spring, I replied with "that's fine, I can wait a few extra months; I'm busy with school and my backlog of games anyways" thinking I wouldn't be waiting an entire fucking year. Please, Nintendo, stop fucking around with your fans. If it's not going to be Gamecube exclusive, don't say it will be. If you're delaying your flagship title for more than a little extra polish, don't lie about it and say it'll be out in a couple months.
 
Ganondorf>Link said:
Yeah I'm expecting Smash to be delayed into 2007, but still there is a chance that it may make it out in 2006. Still though, having Zelda and Mario plus the new IP at launch is going to steal of ton of sales from 3rd party games.
Click to expand...

I don't know if this is neccessarily true. The market overall on Nintendo machines tends to become bigger for everyone when Nintendo is releasing big time games (thus driving the userbase).

Revolution is simply never going to be a third-party driven platform ala the Playstation. Nintendo games will always make up a large portion of the software sales overall. But if Nintendo can't carry the machine with their own exclusives .... what chance do third parties have?

Resident Evil did nothing for the GameCube. It would've been to Resident Evil's benefit on the GCN, if Nintendo had Super Mario 64/Zelda: OoT/GoldenEye type hits around it.
 
Battersea Power Station said:
I'm not knocking the rest of your argument, but I doubt this is true. I'm sure there'll be some GTA or similarly high-profile game to make Zelda look small.
Click to expand...

There is no GTA game coming out this year.

Face it, this is going to most likely be the biggest console release of the year.

Zelda is still one of the most reknown and high profile franchises the industry has.

Zelda: TWW's sales were held back by two main factors IMO -- the radical visual style change and the lack of polish to the game ... neither will apply to Twilight Princess. If positioned as a dual GC/Rev title, I would expect this to sell well into 2007 as people pick up their Revolution systems.
 
soundwave05 said:
There is no GTA game coming out this year.

Face it, this is going to most likely be the biggest console release of the year.

Zelda is still one of the most reknown and high profile franchises the industry has.
Click to expand...

Yes, but FFXII is coming out this year, and while I want Zelda way, way more than that, I have no doubt FFXII is going to outsell it by a wide margin.
 
Battersea Power Station said:
I'm not knocking the rest of your argument, but I doubt this is true. I'm sure there'll be some GTA or similarly high-profile game to make Zelda look small.
Click to expand...
a GTA for PSP is coming yes, but how can you make a post like that without something to back you up. make a list of the games you think will make Zelda look "small" :P
 
Ganondorf>Link said:
Yes, but FFXII is coming out this year, and while I want Zelda way, way more than that, I have no doubt FFXII is going to outsell it by a wide margin.
Click to expand...
doubtful watch how the new battle system will turn off a lot of people, it will sell yes but nothing mindblowing.
 
Error2k4 said:
doubtful watch how the new battle system will turn off a lot of people, it will sell yes but nothing mindblowing.
Click to expand...

FFXII is going to outsell Zelda, world wide at least and definitley in Japan. I wouldn't be surprised if it outsold in America as well.
 
yes

btw does anyone know where I can find that 30-minute video of TP IGN did I never saw it. if it's full of spoilers forget it :P
 
Error2k4 said:
doubtful watch how the new battle system will turn off a lot of people, it will sell yes but nothing mindblowing.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter how crappy the battle system is. It will sell like gangbusters on the name alone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Zelda needs to be zelda again
Opinion  2 3 4 5
247
455
Effigenius replied
New glitch discovered in The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time.
16
32
tylrdiablos replied
  • Poll
Zelda Subtitle Nomenclature
9
224
ResurrectedContrarian replied
The Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap PC port in development
12
353
Trilobit replied
Zelda Voice Actress Discusses Creative Direction in Audition
Opinion 
14
377
NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt replied
Top Bottom