Not sure why people are acting like these scores are decent, regardless of this being FF or not.
When the best score you can get from a major site is a 7, that's pretty fucking bad.
Got to play around with a review copy for a few hours and all of these 7's are very generous in my opinion. I know that usually isn't enough time to judge a RPG but the game is seriously flawed. I liked XIII, never got a chance to play XIII-2, and was actually looking forward to trying this game out based on the early impressions.
I guess people who love the Lightning Saga will suffer through the game, but I feel like if it wasnt a Final Fantasy it would be scoring 4's and 5's.
tl;dr: Story is a mess, gameplay is better.
Finally an end to this trilogy. Bring me more original FFs please.
IGN said:But despite great battles, they're arguably less important than they've ever been in the series. You don't earn XP and level up through combat, only by completing quests. These range from story-based encounters with classic characters, to countless boring fetch-quests that make me feel like I was stuck in the opening hours of an MMO. If a quest's goal wasnt combat-related, I found myself avoiding combat, the thing I enjoyed most about Lightning Returns, in favor of making a beeline for the goal that would level me up faster.
horrifying to know he is now freed to poison other FFsDat Toriyama seal of quality.
This douche needs to literally get kicked out of Squeenix, with a boot firmly planted on his ass.
/fixedThe franchise deserves better director.
I am looking forward to the game, but I hope this teaches SE not to try and create additional long running franchises within their established long running franchise. Brand fatigue has taken its toll on XIII, and the first game was divisive enough.
I would love to hear more about this!In my experience, it's almost impossible to give a Square game (especially a FF game) below a 7 at most outlets.
So there could very well be a lot of 7s because that's the lowest their editors let them give it.
/fixed
5s? No.Go back in time to the psone days and tell people next gen FF games would be getting 5's. People would beat the shit out of you.
Lowest reviewed mainline final fantasy ever. Yeesh
5s? No.
But even in its heyday FFs almost never got 10s. 8s and 8.5s were pretty common. I know because it made me rage as a teenager![]()
http://assets.vg247.com/current//2013/07/Lightning-returns-cloud-4.jpg[IMG]
Final Fantasy 7[SPOILER]/10[/SPOILER][/QUOTE]
Someone photoshop Cloud's FFVII AC hair onto that picture and we'd have come full circle since that first FFXIII reveal of Lightning when she was referred to derisively as the female Cloud.
Doesn't someone have a GAF bet over this game scoring the highest of the XIII trilogy?
Perfo?
Halfway through, I think it's worse than 13/13-2.
Lowest reviewed mainline final fantasy ever. Yeesh
3 games in.
Square Enix: We've made a huge mistake.
Never let Toriyama direct another FF game.
yowza! and those games were mediocre at best.Halfway through, I think it's worse than 13/13-2.
Is that really accurate? I mean FF2 and FF14's original releases were broken messes. If they were reviewed today, they'd get below 4s.
http://www.novacrystallis.com/2013/...l-fantasy-committee-to-ensure-series-quality/Toriyama needs to be removed from this franchise ASAP.
Lowest reviewed mainline final fantasy ever. Yeesh
Those are some remarkably consistent review scores so far.
THe consensus seems to be "It's....fine. I guess. But whatever."