Watch_Dogs downgradeaton confirmed

Status
Not open for further replies.
WHATISGOINGON_zps70bb3f13.jpg


"This is what a next gen game should look like!"

"What console was used?"

"Don't know :)"

L oh fucking L.

Lol. She is unbelievable. I can't tell if she really does know and doesn't want to say. Or if she truly doesn't know and has to comment that it looks next gen either way.
 
While that line of PR was a huge mistake, we're blowing it out of proportion, as well as going OT.

After all, plenty of things we've said, while maybe 100% correct or justified, were not the proper thing to say in that situation. Both here and probably our work environments. Not worth crusading over just because it involves a topic what many of us are getting hot over.

You're right, it is getting really off topic, but what shes saying is making it worse. People want answers to questions, and the answers people are getting aren't helping at all.

Best to ignore what shes saying.
 
50+ pages.

My lord gaf. I mean I love graphics too but damn. Maybe, just maybe the game will be... I don't know... fun?
 
Disappointing, but I'll still buy it if it's a good game.

We can fully expect the same thing will happen with the Division correct?

i think so.

no way it will look like in the tech demo.

it wont be on last gen consoles, so maybe it will look better but it`s Ubisoft sooo probably not^^
 
You're right, it is getting really off topic, but what shes saying is making it worse. People want answers to questions, and the answers people are getting aren't helping at all.

Best to ignore what shes saying.
People don't want answers. People know the deal already. They are just trying to fan the flames at this point.
 
Having said that, I've got a GTX 670 from 2 years back and it still runs Assassin's Creed 4 much, much better than either of the next-gen consoles could, and at the same time allowing the game to look* much better. I don't think the $150 card in question (a 750 Ti) is much worse than a GTX 670, so I'm not sure how badly PC gamers will be hit by Ubisoft's shitty PC ports

660 vs 670
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/660?vs=598

660 vs 750 Ti
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1039?vs=1130

The 750 Ti's strength is that it performs that well while using considerably less power and produces less heat. 670 is quite a lot stronger though. A $200 Maxwell GPU will be very interesting to see.
 
Yo, if she loses her job or gets in trouble it'll have nothing to do with what gamers think about what she said, it'll have everything to do with what the client thinks about what she said. Comparison marketing is frowned upon in a lot of industries and if the powers that be at Ubisoft aren't into it, that's basically it once you badmouth a competing game.
 
50+ pages.

My lord gaf. I mean I love graphics too but damn. Maybe, just maybe the game will be... I don't know... fun?

A thread about visual downgrades, and then discussions about visual downgrades happen. Gotta pick my bits of brain around the room with how much my mind was blown.
 
Is that gif the only comparison or is there another one? Because if that's the only proof of a downgrade this thread is just ridiculous.

In general there's plenty of stuff that indicates the game was downgraded quite a bit visually. That gif is just the easiest way to show it since it's two very similar scenes.

But just look at that picture in the consctruction area with the wall texture that looks like something from an ugly 360/ps3 game

Or how the explosion in the car chase gif lookd like shit compared to the explosion in the gif from the '12 reveal. it's so obvious that it's just some flat textures. The '12 explosion was much better visually and technically.

Look how stale and lifeless the streets look. There's hardly any people. Things don't seem to move in the wind unlike in the reveal trailer where things moving in the wind really helped make the world come alive ( this might be a matter of weather conditions though )

Look at how flat and dull the lighting looks. This is honestly the biggest problem, and the main reason why people thought and hoped it was the 360/ps3/wii u version before the ps4 confirmation. It looks like lighting found in games on the last gen consoles. The lighting in the footage before the delay was much better.
 
Ubisoft needs to release a comparison trailer of all SKU's - PC on Max, PS4, Xbox One, and Wii U.

MGS Ground Zeroes did it, so there's no reason other than it shows the problems the game has now.
 
On Twitter. Exact source is buried somewhere in those 50 pages. :)

That's NOT TRUE.

Sony hasn't confirmed anything about this.

You are talking about @PlayStationDK (second or third page) BUT they showed the official trailer and that scene is not there.
 
Seriously.

This thread is really highlighting how over-reactive GAF has become. It's fun to some degree but this is just out of control.
Yes, we are too sensitive these days, but to be fair she was the one who made that comment. She could have made her point without talking about any specific game.
 
People don't want answers. People know the deal already. They are just trying to fan the flames at this point.

I wasn't talking about people on Gaf specifically, look at how many people are tweeting her, people are commending the game, questioning it, bashing it, or anywhere in between.
 
This looks good.

I want to see the game in motion myself though.

That footage is from this preview http://www.everyeye.it/ps4/articoli/watch-dogs_hands-on_21862. Not in English, but the footage is what you're looking for. Again, it doesn't look awful, but the feel of a "living, breathing world" from the intial reveal is absent from this footage and that's what is throwing people off. All of the atmospheric effects seem watered down or stripped away completely.
 
Ubisoft needs to release a comparison trailer of all SKU's - PC on Max, PS4, Xbox One, and Wii U.

MGS Ground Zeroes did it, so there's no reason other than it shows the problems the game has now.

The Fox Engine was designed around this concept.

God knows how scaling works for what ever engine Watch_Dogs runs on.
 
Yup. Part of why everyone in this industry is made of plastic is the fact that even consumers are way too sensitive about everything.

It seems to me that there's absolutely no middle-ground to any point of discussion any more. If the graphics aren't awesome, they are utter shit. If its not exactly what people want to hear/read, the person saying it must be the worst...
 
Outlast looked like an early lastgen title in hi res, it did the job and thats about it.

true. but it did its job, aka i got more important things to be focused on than textures... and isn't the folks behind that a bit smaller than your average 500+ ubisoft global production?


still an odd comparisons from PR person.
 
Ubisoft needs to release a comparison trailer of all SKU's - PC on Max, PS4, Xbox One, and Wii U.

MGS Ground Zeroes did it, so there's no reason other than it shows the problems the game has now.
What they need to do is to show us the same mission that was in the reveal demo. If there weren't any downgrades then that would be the best way to prove it
 
Here is the "PS4 confirmation" thing...

https://twitter.com/PlayStationDK/status/441589559399559168

Bullshit, that trailer doesn't show that scene...

I have acknowledged it and explained why the general assumption is it's also from the PS4 in an earlier post.

That's true, yeah.
The trailer doesn't look anywhere near like the E3 2012 reveal either, though, and I find it very hard to believe Ubisoft would give out b-roll footage of the last-gen version. Hell, except for the Aisha Tyler trailer they haven't shown the last-gen versions yet, not even to journalists. Why include scenes of it in b-roll footage that'll get used by magazines for their video previews?
 
it was some vegas game, hell I don't know.

I'm still hyped for Watchdogs and can't wait to play it. I have to say, it would sure as hell suck to be people that aren't looking forward to this game or just going by heresay on here. LOL Game is going to rock.
 
Considering the mission structure and gameplay of the past few AC titles, it's sort of a toss-up.
True. To be honest I only enjoyed 1 AC title myself. The previews atleast seem like the delay was atleast good for the gameplay of the game. Time will tell.

I just didn't see this being that big of a deal. 50 pages usually get thrown to betrayltons not downgradeatons. :P
 
It seems to me that there's absolutely no middle-ground to any point of discussion any more. If the graphics aren't awesome, they are utter shit. If its not exactly what people want to hear/read, the person saying it must be the worst...

You're right about the hyperbole in this regard, but you have to admit that the GIF in the OP does in fact look horrible for next-gen footage (if that's even what it is).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom