Panzerkrei
Banned
Yeah, recorded that earlier on my XBO:
Giant Bomb wasn't exaggerating with the single digit fps. The game definitely needs some polish. (It's still awesome, tons of fun, everybody should buy it, yadada)
GiantBomb: Titanfall Quick Look is Live
- Thread starter Miles Quaritch
- Start date
TheSinkingKnight
Member
Wasn't The Sims 4 supposed to be released at this time instead, and EA decided to go with Titanfall instead?
How did people get it for 30? There's a buttload of posts to that thread.
SneakyStephan
Banned
I've played source games since hl2 leaked alpha and later cs beta and there was never any hiccuping (also this isn't hiccuping, horrible freezing)
source isn't even a streaming engine like ue3 or id5, it doesn't make sense to have this kind of freezing /stuttering
the only stuttering I've ever experienced in source was in cs go
Fixed2BeBroken
Member
mexico vpn and yea, today you wont be able to find the posts easily, but yesterday it was being discussed most of the day
NathanMcMahon
Banned
hyperbole.
Saberus
Member
Some things are just to bloody funny ..lol
Kibbles
Member
They give no shit about fps they've been talking about upping the resolution lol
Wish we knew more about the 360 version. My copy is at home sealed right now but I'll wait and return it if the 360 runs it better. The graphics aren't good anyway so that's no concern I'm sure it'll just be like 600p with worse lighting like CoD
Neuromancer
Member
Jesus fuck
littlegrasshopper
Member
LMFAO
The hitch in that gif isn't common. It's not like you're running around in the game constantly dropping to 2fps or something. The 60fps quicklook bares this out. It does mean that there's a hitch we should fix. Some unexpected situation in code where it's suddenly using a ton of CPU for a few frames. That's a bug. If it happened all the time we would have fixed it before the game ever saw the light of day. =)
Your numbers look right-ish, but everything else is crazytown. Beta had better performance than Alpha, and day-0 Retail (which is what people are playing today) has better performance than the Beta. Retail > Beta > Alpha. Resolution increased and that has essentially nothing to do with CPU constraints. Resolution will likely increase again, and that will still have essentially nothing to do with CPU (instead it'll be GPU and memory work, etc). The "leaks" about final asset sizes were always comically wrong.
...though of course I would say that, because I hate freedom.
I linked this in another thread last night, but if anyone is genuinely curious about performance and what we have planned, our lead tech guy explains a lot here:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-titanfall-ships-at-792p
Wow. No.
Your numbers look right-ish, but everything else is crazytown. Beta had better performance than Alpha, and day-0 Retail (which is what people are playing today) has better performance than the Beta. Retail > Beta > Alpha. Resolution increased and that has essentially nothing to do with CPU constraints. Resolution will likely increase again, and that will still have essentially nothing to do with CPU (instead it'll be GPU and memory work, etc). The "leaks" about final asset sizes were always comically wrong.
...though of course I would say that, because I hate freedom.
I linked this in another thread last night, but if anyone is genuinely curious about performance and what we have planned, our lead tech guy explains a lot here:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-titanfall-ships-at-792p
Neuromancer
Member
Wait... The alpha performs better than the retail game? How? Why?
Felix Lighter
Member
The weird thing about that gif is that it looks like the game is actually slowing down, like the game logic is tied to the framerate, which can't be true for a game with an expected variable framerate.
KoopaTheCasual
Junior Member
Didn't alpha have really bad textures tho?
So did I, thought it was chrome acting up again. Holy crap.
CBoat was right all along!
Glad I decided to go with the PC version even if I hate using Origin. Still, a little more optimization would be great..it doesn't feel like it's running as well as it should be considering the rig I'm using.
the episode where picard plays on european dota servers?
Okay, yeah, I mangled the hell out of that sentence.
Beta improved on the Alpha.
Retail improves on the Beta.
Retail > Beta > Alpha
Its funny all the asshats that haven't played the game is pulling up a gift showing the slow down. Well I've been playing for 12 hours now and haven't experience it yet. Now if it was a consistent problem then I could see the outrage. But this is coming from the same hater who aren't interested in the game and come online to spout nonsense.
KoopaTheCasual
Junior Member
Woah, calm down buddy. It's not like these "asshats" are making anything up. There is proof that it happens.
Kazuma Kiryu
Member
ambientmystic
Member
Good ol' post history. It never fails to out the unhinged.
serversurfer
Member
I guess you're banned* now, but just so I'm clear, what you're taking issue with is the fact that CBoaT never explicitly said that meeting performance targets was the reason for cutting the assets? Sorry, but isn't that implied? What other reasonable motivation would there be for cutting the assets?
*These unexplained bans kinda freak me out; how are we to know what behavior to avoid? Gestault's replies didn't strike me as particularly ban-worthy… =/
So you're saying it is CPU-related? What's causing it, and why wasn't it fixed? It seems to be reasonably common; can you really not track it down? Was it happening in the Alpha? Why did no one seem to notice? Is that maybe a clue for you guys?
Did it? Like I said, I looked for impressions of the Alpha, and they seemed mostly positive, and the general consensus was that performance was generally on par with past CoD titles. Impressions of the Beta and Retail aren't universally bad or anything, but there seems to be agreement there are now significant performance issues.
Can you point me to where people were condemning the performance of the Alpha? Or maybe to people saying the Beta performed "sooooo much better" than the Alpha, or something like that?
… and work for Respawn.
Thanks, I'll check that out.
Bornstellar
Member
Watching Jeff not wall run is maddening.
ReturnOfTheRAT
Member
Genius gif, Eltorro. I'm watching the GB video right now.
blueplancha
Banned
Giantbomb's player doesn't appear to play at full FPS in Fullscreen. Looks smoother when playing in small player.
Holy Shit! Those logo transitions are legit as fuck.
Do you know why the massive dip in fps when Titans are on-screen happens? I know it's from Beta, but I'm referring to the video from that DF posted with the fps graph program they use. It seems like whenever a player was walking around and encountered a titan, up close or even 50ft~ away, it would dip down to around 44~48fps. When there was a few titans on screen, maybe 4, it dipped down to around 34fps.
I'm not sure you're aware of this and I haven't looked into any retail video feeds to see if the problem still existed.
Anyways, thanks for taking the time to come talk on the boards.
Unknown One
Member
Hahahahaha I'm dying.