Final Trailer for The Amazing Spider-man 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
First movie was mediocre, and I haven't liked the last few trailers, but hopefully this turns out better.
 
I don't know. Giamatti has a few scenes without the suit (the truck chase). I think they'd want to explain where he gets a giant rhino shaped mech suit.
 
Messypandas said:
ibnWs7fnMLXAvA.gif
Click to expand...
Fucking awesome. But I wish they wouldn't show so much
 
Abounder said:
Hyped. Looks like damn good fun.



I like it. Movies should show more and be transparent like when the Joker bank scene was released for The Dark Knight, or the scenes available for the new Captain America movie
Click to expand...

But the joker scene is literally the opening minutes of the Dark Knight.

These trailers reveal beat for beat, the entire plot of the SpiderMan film, the entire character arc of the villains, and reveals which characters will be present in the final act.

Sony fucking sucks at marketing their movies.
 
It's hard to believe this comes out in the same timeframe as Xmen DoFP.
We've seen EVERYTHING from one film, and hardly ANYTHING from the other.
 
I much prefered ASM to the Raimi films so I'm really hyped for this. Andrew Garfiled is infinitely better than Tobey Maguire.
 
It feels like Sony have a thousand Don Draper clones marketing this film and they don't know each other is working on it too.

It was the same as the last film. I bet the marketing spend on this is ridiculous in typical Sony Pictures fashion. It feels like they aren't trying to entice people to see this film but beat them into submission.
 
bjb said:
The first one was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. I walked out of the theater.
Click to expand...

Not the worse but far from a great movie. I didn't like the actors performance and I didn't like the direction it went. I have zero interest in a sequel which is a shame as Spiderman was one of my favourite superheros. I used to read the comics as a kid.
 
THe action looks insane. The lizard fight in school gave me a taste of this before, but now it looks they're going all out now on Spiderman awesomeness.

Also "I did some web design" :D
 
Welp I am hyped now, luckily this movie comes out after I have finished Uni so it's fine.

Really hoping that they don't chicken out killing off Gwen Stacy as Peter must be with Mary-Jane, his one and only true love.
 
The action looks very comic book like and over the top based on what I see in those gifs. That's missing from alot of comic book adaptations. Even avengers was a bit tame in that respect.

Looking forward to this one. There was a taste of this in the first one but they're going all out now. I like when directors aren't afraid to have a little fun.
 
agrajag said:
Yes, by a hair.
Click to expand...
Maybe if that hair is about a thousand feet wide.

There's nothing in ASM that I can remember that is as bad as emo Peter, dance numbers, Sandman being Uncle Bens killer for some reason, Venom pulling back his mask constantly despite the fact that his mask is a fully functional face in the first place, and it's a perfect example of how not do a super hero movie with multiple villains. I could go on really.
 
Zen_Arcade said:
Maybe if that hair is about a thousand feet wide.

There's nothing in ASM that I can remember that is as bad as emo Peter, dance numbers, Sandman being Uncle Bens killer for some reason, Venom pulling back his mask constantly despite the fact that his mask is a fully functional face in the first place, and it's a perfect example of how not do a super hero movie with multiple villains. I could go on really.
Click to expand...

This always fucking bugged me and I could never understand why Topher had monster fangs with the mask off. MADE NO SENSE.
 
Darth Zandatsu said:
Sorry but no.
emo-peter-spider-man-3.jpg


Emo Peter was fucking atrocious.
Click to expand...

Not as bad as Amazing Spiderman.

That film was a terrible soul-less bore-fest.

Also you should read Film Critic HULK, here:

MOST PEOPLE AGREE THAT SPIDER-MAN 3 PRETTY MUCH SUCK. OK? GOOD. MOVING ON. THE REAL REASON IT SUCK IT BECAUSE IT FORGET MOST BASIC ELEMENTS OF STORYTELLING 101. IT HAVE ZERO NARRATIVE STEAM AND ENERGY. IT CONFUSED ABOUT CHARACTER MOTIVATION. IT SIDETRACK PLOT CONSTANTLY. THESE SIMPLE SCREENWRITING PROBLEMS. BUT WHAT THE ONE THING TONS PEOPLE POINT TO AS WHY IT SUCK?

EMO PETER PARKER.

NEVERMIND FACT MOST PEOPLE NOT KNOW WHAT "EMO" ACTUALLY MEAN

HULK HATE SAY IT, BUT THE SAD TRUTH THAT THE “EMO PETER PARKER” SEQUENCE THE ONLY ONE IN FILM THAT ACTUALLY HAVE SENSE OF HUMOR AND PALPABLE ENERGY. SERIOUSLY, HULK ARGUE IT THE ONLY “GOOD” SEQUENCE IN FILM. WATCH IT AGAIN BELOW. HULK THINK MAGUIRE DELIVERING GREAT COMIC PERFORMANCE. ESPECIALLY SINCE THE REAL JOKE THAT THIS WHAT A “CONFIDENT” PETER PARKER ACTUALLY LOOK/ACT LIKE. HILARIOUS.

BUT GIVEN THAT REST OF FILM HAVE NO ENERGY + FUN SCENES WHATSOEVER, IT THEREFORE NOT FIT TONE OF MOVIE WHATSOEVER. IT SIMPLY WAY, WAY DIFFERENT. THEREFORE, IT TANGIBLE TO EVERYONE WHO SEE IT. IT BECOME DEFAULT THING PEOPLE POINT OUT WHEN TRYING EXPLAIN WHY THE MOVIE (WHICH THEY ABSORBED ON VISCERAL LEVEL) SUCKED. TRUST HULK, EVEN IF THE EMO PETER PARKER SEQUENCE NOT IN MOVIE, PEOPLE STILL BE TALKING ABOUT HOW MUCH SPIDER-MAN 3 COMPLETELY AND WHOLLY SUCKED. IT JUST THE THING THAT STOOD OUT TO EVERYONE.

OKAY, THAT NOT EVEN THE ONLY REASON. THE OTHER BIG THING PEOPLE POINTED TO THAT “IT HAVE TOO MANY VILLAINS!” NO. NOT AT ALL. IT JUST IT HAVE VILLAINS WHOSE PLOT-LINES GO NOWHERE AND HAVE NOTHING DO WITH EACH OTHER. THE DARK KNIGHT HAVE TWO VILLAINS AND WORK CAUSE THE VILLAINS STORIES INTERTWINED AT KEY POINTS AND CONSTANTLY DRIVE NARRATIVE FORWARD. HULK RECENTLY TALK ABOUT REASON FIRST KUNG FU PANDA WORK SO WELL THAT THE FIVE MAIN CHARACTERS MOTIVATIONS AND PLOT ALL TIE INTO EACH OTHER SEAMLESSLY. AGAIN, IT GO BACK TO STORYTELLING 101. BUT IN SPIDER-MAN 3 EVERY CHARACTER JUST SORT OF DOING OWN THING REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER ELSE GOING ON. AND RAIMI HAD NO INTEREST IN VENOM SO STUDIO FORCED IT ON HIM TO BOOT. AS RESULT, THE SCENE WHERE VENOM AND SANDMAN “TEAM UP” LAUGHABLE IN ITS LAZY CONSTRUCTION. IT COULD NO GIVE LESS OF SHIT. AGAIN, IT NOT THAT THERE ARE TWO VILLAINS. IT THAT THE TWO VILLAINS JUST NOT DONE WELL WHATSOEVER. THE “TOO MANY VILLAINS!” MANTRA SOMETHING NOTICEABLE TO MOVIE-GOING PUBLIC BECAUSE THE PRIOR SPIDER-MAN MOVIES SUCCEED GREAT WITH JUST ONE VILLAIN.
Click to expand...

Full article for context: http://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/tag/spider-man-3/
 
We need a few Spiderman MEGAFLOPs so that Sony will stop making them and the licence will revert back to Marvel.

It doesn't look like this will be one though. Maybe the next reboot cycle will be dire.
 
UrbanRats said:
Not as bad as Amazing Spiderman.

That film was a terrible soul-less bore-fest.

Also you should read Film Critic HULK, here:



Full article for context: http://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/tag/spider-man-3/
Click to expand...
Even if ASM was soulless it was still better then a movie that actively bad.

And all that Film Hulk thing is saying is that the emo Peter is the least worst part of SM3, which is like saying that the best part of the turd you're eating is a corn kernel you found in the middle.

That movie would still be bad even without emo Peter and emo Peter would be bad even in a great Spider-Man movie.
 
Zen_Arcade said:
Maybe if that hair is about a thousand feet wide.

There's nothing in ASM that I can remember that is as bad as emo Peter, dance numbers, Sandman being Uncle Bens killer for some reason, Venom pulling back his mask constantly despite the fact that his mask is a fully functional face in the first place, and it's a perfect example of how not do a super hero movie with multiple villains. I could go on really.
Click to expand...

No, ASM is worse by a hair. It didn't need multiple villains to be a complete clusterfuck.
 
agrajag said:
No, ASM is worse by a hair. It didn't need multiple villains to be a complete clusterfuck.
Click to expand...
I never said that ASM was a great movie, just that it's better then the mess that is SM3.

ASM is a mediocre movie. They did some things better then the Raimi movies and some things worse. They didn't do anything well in Spider-Man 3.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

First Tease for Spider-Man: Brand New Day
2
68
1K
GymWolf replied
The first ever documented Spider-Man fan film
2
290
kunonabi replied
Spider-Man Noir | First Teaser
14
758
JCK75 replied
Tom Holland Rushed to Hospital After ‘Spider-Man 4’ Stunt Mishap
29
364
DKehoe replied
Spider-Man The Animated Series is Getting the X-men 97 Treatment...
23
1K
Beretta replied
Top Bottom