New Mozilla (Firefox) CEO Brendan Eich Donated To Anti-Gay Charity - Boycott Started!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jasper

Member
Gay Firefox developers boycott Mozilla to protest CEO hire (Updated)

6a00d8341c730253ef01a3fcde7fcf970b-250wi


Brendan Eich's Prop 8 donations come to light, and internal response is mixed.

Yesterday, after nearly a year of searching, the Mozilla Foundation announced the hiring of longtime CTO Brendan Eich as its new CEO. The internal hire looks like Mozilla opted for a technological leader to head up the front office as opposed to a business school expert, though at this point, Eich's coding chops (inventing JavaScript, co-founding Mozilla) have possibly been outpaced by his past nine years of Mozilla leadership work.

But much of the public reaction to his promotion skipped past that "can a coder run a company" question, focusing squarely on another financial issue. In 2008, Eich donated $1,000 in support of California's Proposition 8, the ballot initiative that sought to ban gay marriage in the state. So shortly after the announcement of Eich's hiring, the reaction came swiftly. In particular, developers came forward with a mix of boycotts and reluctant acceptance.

App developer Rarebit ignited the conversation by announcing that it pulled its apps from the Firefox Marketplace. In a statement, Rarebit CEO Hampton Catlin recalled the story of his own gay marriage experience in California, which allowed him to marry Rarebit co-founder Michael Catlin. Catlin called Eich out for both his Prop 8 donation and his choice not to apologize.

"We morally cannot support a foundation that would not only leave someone with hateful views in power but will give them a promotion and put them in charge of the entire organization," he wrote.

Mozilla Education Lead Christie Koehler offered an internal perspective. She repeatedly expressed disappointment with the news of Eich's Prop 8 donation but also insisted that she saw no reason for Mozilla's principles of "openness, innovation, and opportunity" to change because of Eich's new role. After expressing empathy for Mozilla's search for the right internal hire, she praised the company's LGBT-friendly benefits packages, its internal guidelines for participation, and its board of directors. Koehler asked anybody who shared her mixed sentiments to join her efforts in cementing Mozilla's policies toward openness and inclusion.

"Many Mozillians are themselves advocates for human rights, animal rights, prison abolition, marriage equality, racial equality, etc," Koehler wrote. "Some of those causes might overlap with the cause of a free and open Internet, but they are separate causes, and none of them are the focus of Mozilla the organization."

Another Mozillian, W3C co-chair Daniel Glazman, offered support for Eich. Glazman attempted to divorce politics from the greater Mozilla mission: "We, as a community, cannot promote openness and freedom of choice without a deep respect for individual beliefs. A reminder of Brendan's personal choices years ago is unfair and violates the core values of the Mozilla community."

Eich's own statement, posted on his personal blog in 2012, did not speak to the specific reasons for his $1,000 donation in support of Prop 8. After claiming that "the donation [did] not constitute evidence of animosity," he denounced naysayers by saying that they were "not providing a reasoned argument." He offered no clarification on that point. Eich concluded the piece by saying, "I do not insist that anyone agree with me on a great many things, including political issues, and I refrain from putting my personal beliefs in others’ way in all matters Mozilla, JS, and Web. I hope for the same in return."

The rise from CTO to CEO places Eich's years-old statements in a massive spotlight. As a pure technology company, Mozilla can possibly consider itself politically agnostic so long as free speech of all kinds remains unfettered for international Internet users. But Eich, above all, must know that he made the choice to spend money toward a political aim. Since he's now climbed to a CEO post without offering any apology or explanation, the users and developers who disagree may very well respond in kind.

Update: In response to our report, Mozilla representatives directed us to a press release from the foundation's official blog. Titled "Mozilla Statement on Diversity," the post does not specifically refer to Eich's hiring. Instead, it opens by saying, "Mozilla has always been deeply committed to honoring diversity in sexual orientation and beliefs within our staff and community, across all the project’s activities." The post then reiterates Koehler's prior statements about Mozilla's LGBT-friendly healthcare plans, adding, "With thousands of people spanning many countries and cultures, diversity is core to who we are, and we’re united in our mission to keep the Web open and accessible for everyone."

http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/gay-firefox-developers-boycott-mozilla-to-protest-ceo-hire/
 
Yeah sorry. That letter on diversity is a cop out. I'm not buying it and nor should anyone else.

Total bullshit side step.
 
I'm not sure why anyone should care. I could see if he used company funds... but he used his personal money to donate to a cause that he personally believed in. This has nothing to do with the company that he works for.
 
Given the industry he is in and the demographic of heavy internet users (young people), this is probably the worst thing e could have done. If there is one thing Google and the like are known for it's their respect towards gay employees.
 
Wow, fuck this piece of shit. I don't care how good a coder he was in the past. Deeply disappointed in Mozilla.
 
I switched back to Chrome a few weeks back anyway. This pretty much vindicated me uninstalling Fox altogether rather than having both on my PC.
 
I'm actually pretty surprised at this, both because I wouldn't expect a new-agey tech company based on the democratization of technology to attract bigots and because I wouldn't expect the rare such person to be promoted to CTO and now CEO.
 
Meh, I'm still sticking with Firefox.
He did it with his own funds, not Firefox's. He's got a right to support what he believes in.
 
I'm not sure why anyone should care. I could see if he used company funds... but he used his personal money to donate to a cause that he personally believed in. This has nothing to do with the company that he works for.

I think people are allowed to have an objection due to the nature of the 'cause that he personally believed in.' Since that cause was to strip gay people of their 14th Amendment protections.
 
Given that the man has been at the company in a position of great importance for many years, I'm not sure why people would suddenly take umbrage at this promotion. He is clearly qualified for the job, has years of experience inside the company.

Unless Mozilla's positions themselves change, his personal views shouldn't have such an effect. This is not a Chick-fil-a situation.
 
Wonder what thousands of dubious causes millions of employees of other companies products I use and like donate to.
 
It's his *personal* position as an individual, yeah? Not the *entire organization*? So I don't see the issue.

Now, if Mozilla themselves starts campaigning GAY PEOPLE SUCKS themselves then of course, it'd be a problem.

But until then? I am sorry, nah.
 
I'm not sure why anyone should care. I could see if he used company funds... but he used his personal money to donate to a cause that he personally believed in. This has nothing to do with the company that he works for.

Should anyone ever care if a group they belong to or support is hated by a person running a company? Should Jewish people care if a neo nazi was CEO? Should black people care if it were a white supremacist?
 
Should anyone ever care if a group they belong to or support is hated by a person running a company? Should Jewish people care if a neo nazi was CEO? Should black people care if it were a white supremacist?

If that person can directly influence such matters, then of course. Is it the case here?

Have Mozilla actually has a history of doing such things when he worked there, apparently on also various important positions? Do we have any indication that they will change their stance now that he's the CEO? Does the entire company revolves around him like, say, Apple revolved around Steve Jobs?
 
Douchecanoe, ahoy!

I won't stop using Firefox though. Seems they are sorta stuck with a bigot as their CEO (for now). Hopefully he falls down a set of stairs or something.
 
I just ditched Firefox.





Cause im sick of how bad the mobile app is and at least chrome is decent on both fronterlys.

If the CEO of Microsoft or Apple came out and said something very racist and had links to white supremacist groups, would you mind?

Ponderous!
 
I'm torn. I'm of the belief that freedom of opinion includes freedom to hold shitty opinions, but I also feel like there's a line crossed here in supporting initiatives that have a harmful impact on innocent people.
 
Should anyone ever care if a group they belong to or support is hated by a person running a company? Should Jewish people care if a neo nazi was CEO? Should black people care if it were a white supremacist?

No because those are his personal beliefs and it will have absolutely nothing to do with how he runs the company.

There is no need to boycott Mozilla, it doesn't matter that they employee a bigot.

What's the big deal?! Everyone is always looking for something to complain about!
 
Eh, it's pretty easy to use a different browser so I uninstalled Firefox and am using Chrome again. It's also easy to show my displeasure with promoting a guy that doesn't think I deserve the right to marry. It's not much but it's what I can do.
 
If that person can directly influence such matters, then of course. Is it the case here?

Have Mozilla actually has a history of doing such things when he worked there, apparently on also various important positions? Do we have any indication that they will change their stance now that he's the CEO? Does the entire company revolves around him like, say, Apple revolved around Steve Jobs?

If that person can directly influence what matters? Discrimination by funding hate groups?

Why would I want to send the message that I am happy to support companies that hire and promote people like him, and why would I want to send him the message that he can have shithouse views and still have the support of my business?

Do you think a black person should just suck it up and support a business run by a white supremacist as long as the company wasn't promoting racism? I really don't think they should be expected to do that. If they want to, fine, but I'm not going to tell them they should ignore the ceo's views on race just because it isn't the companies view.

It's not about boycotting the company for being homophobic (which they are not) it is about there being repercussions for being a bigot. Those in favour of unlimited free speech and removing discrimination laws love to talk about the market correcting the bigots and that their business will suffer. Well here we are.

The people in the market (devs and consumers) will take whatever action they deem reasonable in terms of supporting the companies products.

No because those are his personal beliefs and it will have absolutely nothing to do with how he runs the company.

There is no need to boycott Mozilla, it doesn't matter that they employee a bigot.

What's the big deal?! Everyone is always looking for something to complain about!
Again, it is not about how he runs the company, but that I do not want to provide him any support whatsoever. Why should I?

Eh, it's pretty easy to use a different browser so I uninstalled Firefox and am using Chrome again. It's also easy to show my displeasure with promoting a guy that doesn't think I deserve the right to marry. It's not much but it's what I can do.

Exactly.

200+ tabs of porn featuring TS, Beastiality, Yaoi hentai, Interracial Anal, Standard Anal, Brazzers Punishment series, Pretty Raheem, Anal Prolapse, and much more along with no huge ram usage and it just loads so damn fast

Pfft, streaming porn? No thanks, I'll take my delicious HD downloads :)
 
If the CEO of Microsoft or Apple came out and said something very racist and had links to white supremacist groups, would you mind?

Ponderous!

It depends really. How feasible it would be to boycott the company. FF? Pretty easy. Microsoft? It would be incredibly difficult, especially considering I'm currently finishing up a computer programming program in college. It would be nearly impossible to never touch MS stuff again.
 
According to statistics pulled from my anus, 50% of all CEOs are terrible people who you wouldn't want to support for one reason or another, and we just mostly don't know about it.
 
Seems a little strange for it to resurface again then now. Particularly seeing as the man does not appear to have made any bigoted or prejudiced moves since then.

It's still a concern since Firefox derives a tremendous amount of its value from a volunteer army of developers that contribute plugins, apps and enhancements. I'm fine if many of them want to draw the line at watching a homophobe get promoted to CEO rather than sit at a lower position.
 
Pfft, streaming porn? No thanks, I'll take my delicious HD downloads :)

Pfft, downloading HD porn? No thanks, I'll take my delicious HD streams :P. Shoutouts to vPorn HD. Some of the best TS stars(Sarina Valentine) in glorious HD. Also came upon her new interracial vid <3.
 
"I do not insist that anyone agree with me on a great many things, including political issues, and I refrain from putting my personal beliefs in others&#8217; way in all matters Mozilla, JS, and Web. I hope for the same in return."

I can totally respect how he refrains from putting his beliefs in others' way in all matters Mozilla but has no problem putting his beliefs in others' way in regards to marriage equality. Consummate professional, a real class act.

lol, I know threads like these bring out the "why not boycott everything because everyone is scum" guys, to which I answer: a web browser is a really easy thing to boycott. Especially a not-amazing web browser.

I'm torn. I'm of the belief that freedom of opinion includes freedom to hold shitty opinions, but I also feel like there's a line crossed here in supporting initiatives that have a harmful impact on innocent people.
Of course he's free to hold a shitty opinion. Doesn't mean he's free from public backlash.
 
lol, I know threads like these bring out the "why not boycott everything because everyone is scum" guys, to which I answer: a web browser is a really easy thing to boycott. Especially a not-amazing web browser.

Is JavaScript easy to boycott too? :P

kidding
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom