MikeXXIeaf
Banned
I've heard horror stories about playing retro consoles on HDTVs, is it that bad? A local thrift store has SNES games and I've been looking to buy. I'm wondering how it'll look it on my HDTV.
Yeah, I plug whatever in and it doesn't bother me at all. The stretching can look bad sometimes but if it's playable, I'm fine with it.idk man, I plug my N64 into an HDTV and I'm not bothered by it.
To some people their eyes burn.
"Pixels the size of your fist"
![]()
When I play old games like NES, SNES, Genesis, or Virtual Console releases, I just switch my HDTV Picture properties to 4:3 ratio. Reminds me of back in the old days of using my old television sets.
It was a quote said by Cerny.What is the meaning of your picture for your post?
It's always a good idea to play snes, even if played on a potato.
Looks so complicated. ):
Living in an environment so carefully and precisely laid-out that you can't fit two different functions into the same room sounds terrible. :/Even if I did, I can't see myself going out and furnishing a room just to use as a CRT gaming room.
lot of purists say crt or die... but honestly, i quite enjoy playing emulated games @ 4xHQ on my HD LCD... and after playing on 4x ... turning on the SNES... even on a CRT is just too blurry...
Typically the original size of a snes game (240 by uh something i think)
![]()
looks like this on an HDTV
![]()
but personally i like to use hq4x upscaling with emulation to give it a crisp HD sprite look... without messing with any smoothing stuff..
and that looks like this...
![]()
so in the end... i dump all my games over to the PC and play on an emulator... only when i want super retro feel or have friends over and just wanna mess around do i bust out the snes.... but its always on an HD LCD TV... (no way in hell i was keeping my 40" CRT... it weighed a million pounds...)
There's a couple of threads you'll find useful, OP.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=511429
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=630556
Don't let the fearmongering of videophiles on this forum get to you. A lot of it will depend on how good the scaler on your tv is.
If my CRT had RGB, I'd look into it, but elsewise the S Video alone is a huge jump.This, but you really need to avoid S-Video or composite and go with RGB.
Don't let the fearmongering of videophiles on this forum get to you. A lot of it will depend on how good the scaler on your tv is.
This, but you really need to avoid S-Video or composite and go with RGB.
However, the 'upgrade' from S-video to component/RGB is not significant enough for me to suggest spending any time or money if using a consumer SDTV. Unless you have a high-end monitor, such as a Sony PVM, you may not even notice the difference."
With a high-end monitor, however--or a modern display with an image processor, which we'll get to later--those last two signal types become essential.
"RGB and component are very similar," writes Fudoh. "It's hard to find somebody who can actually tell the difference. Component has the benefit of supporting ED and HD resolutions as well...S-Video is certainly closer to RGB than it is to composite and you probably don't have to bother on a 14-inch screen, but the larger the screen gets, the more important a perfect source signal gets. Composite is very complicated signal, which requires tremendous efforts (comb filter, which separates the color from the luminance signal) to look anything but utter shit. I couldn't think of any reason to stick to composite. Even 70s Atari systems can be modded for S-video and getting RGB from a NES isn't this complicated either (just more expensive)."