If you're going to post pseudo science in the thread about well known social constructs and present it as scientific fact, at the very least post a link that doesn't end with:
Your claim that attraction has merely "a veeeeeery small layer of culture sprinkled on it" is clearly nonsense. People are attracted to each other's hairstyles, dress sense, accent, and a whole variety of other things which are entirely cultural.
Man, this thread is messy. People will say anything to make themselves feel better even when they are dismissing an entire race of people as unattractive.
don't see anything wrong with that. it's entirely subjective, not finding people attractive doesn't mean you dislike them or think they are worth less, it's just a sexual preference.
I really don't see that as being racist, and implying I am is really quite offensive especially when you don't actually know me. It could be that my wording is poor? I'm not sure. In any case, like I said women of all backgrounds are thoroughly appreciated by myself, I just happen to gravitate towards the asian girls more.![]()
don't see anything wrong with that. it's entirely subjective, not finding people attractive doesn't mean you dislike them or think they are worth less, it's just a sexual preference.
I don't believe in discrimination so, nope. And yes, it IS discrimination. There is beauty to be found in all people. Discounting a whole ethnicity or preferring one over another is weird and alien and off putting to me. I don't really allow myself to become close to people even friend wise who admit to such behaviors.
race based attraction is racist on some level especially if you're saying something like "I don't like black girls" dismissing an entire race or "oh man I have yellow fever" fetishing another.
Depends on how you word it, "I don't find myself attracted to [insert race] girls" isn't racist. Doesn't mean I think any less of them for that.You don't see anything wrong with dismissing an entire race as unattractive?
no it isn't, I might not be attracted to black girls but that doesn't mean I dislike them. I don't say I will never be attracted by a black girl but so far I haven't, there is nothing more to it.
Depends on how you word it, "I don't find myself attracted to [insert race] girls" isn't racist. Doesn't mean I think any less of them for that.
no it isn't, I might not be attracted to black girls but that doesn't mean I dislike them. I don't say I will never be attracted by a black girl but so far I haven't, there is nothing more to it.
Depends on how you word it, "I don't find myself attracted to [insert race] girls" isn't racist. Doesn't mean I think any less of them for that.
hey, it's not my fault I'm attracted to beautiful soft mermaids and not brute-looking monkeys. You can't deny that every race has characteristics, and I have yet to find a single beautiful monkey. . #teammermaidMan, this thread is messy. People will say anything to make themselves feel better even when they are dismissing an entire race of people as unattractive.
I think the problem is someone being able to even know why someone is attractive to them. I know I can't tell personally. I really have no idea.Okay and, as I said in a previous post, I'm not sure if that's racist or not.
But earlier you were making a distinction between saying "I've yet to find a white person attractive" and "I could never find a white person attractive". Yet if you find certain characteristics, such as white skin, 'fundamentally not attractive' then it's fair to say that you won't find any white people attractive. As I said before, I find that unequivical stance odd whether it's in relation to light skin or dark skin.
Because they don't. Scientists don't even like to use the word race, because it is pretty much a social construct. What you should refer to is ethnicity. There is no ethnicity called "black", or "white". Two white people can be more genetically different than a white and a non-white person.
Depends on how you word it, "I don't find myself attracted to [insert race] girls" isn't racist. Doesn't mean I think any less of them for that.
I think the problem is someone being able to even know why someone is attractive to them. I know I can't tell personally. I really have no idea.
Maybe he does dislike darker skin tones, maybe there's some other criteria the sample group share that he doesn't like, maybe there are black women he finds attractive and didn't even know they were black, there could be lots of potential holes in the fence of that statement. Off the top of my head, I really can't name that many black women I find attractive, I can name some certainly, but it's not many, I can name even less Asian women I find attractive.
I suppose if I really wanted to, I could get images of every celebrity I think is attractive and attempt to build a profile of characteristics they share, but I think there would be very little I could derive from that data. I highlighted the dark hair/blue eyes thing on the previous page, but do I really have a preference for that, or is it something that just happens to stand out about certain people because it's very noticeable. Certainly Alexandra Daddario would still be very attractive in contact lenses, and Nathalie Emmanuel would still be very attractive with a lighter or darker skin tone, it's impossible for me identify what thing attractive people have in common for me.
It's one of the more interesting aspects of the human experience actually, our experience with faces. People always say "Sorry, I'm terrible with names" or whatever, but they're not, they're just insanely exceptional at remembering faces. From a 20x20 pixel face in an avatar you can recognize thousands of people with no effort whatsoever. Someone has a tiny avatar of Lauren Graham (the full body, with room to spare, so she's maybe 100 pixels tall at the most), but it's instantly recognizable to anyone who knows what she looks like. And yet, my ability to assimilate facial data in any meaningful way is completely terrible. I've always feared seeing a crime because I'm sure even if I'd recognize the person from twenty feet, I'd never be able to help build one of those art impressions of someone.
There are things people always cite, symmetry, soft features, clear skin, full lips, thin eyebrows, etc, maybe those things are true, but it's completely subconscious I think. There's something people say in England, I don't know about elsewhere, but 'the double take', it's when you're walking down the street, and in the corner of your eye you catch a glimpse of someone attractive, and while you process it, you've turned away and then look back to see her. I think not only is that true, and common, it's a good example of how instinctive attractiveness is. It's like a sixth sense, someone instantly is or isn't physically attractive, and you can practically sense it.
And personally, I'm just baffled that with the number of black women in the mainstream media in the US and UK some straight men in this thread don't find a single one of them attractive.
I don't see what is so pseudoscientific and outrageous about the notion that biology certainly plays a role when defining what we consider to be beautiful, with symmetry being chiefly among these desired traits. It is even applicable to our concept of non-human beauty as it explains for example, why do we find certain mathematical formulas to be "elegant".
Physical attraction is a wholly biologically process, with a veeeeeery small layer of culture sprinkled on it, and even said cultural preference has deeply seated natural-selection roots.
Not everything in this world and the human beaviour is the result of a sociological construct that can be fought in the context of a neverending cultural war and be molded by sheer force of activism. It is a shocking notion, I know.
I acknowdegle that there are indeed cultural forces that shapes what we consider to be beautiful too. But I like to play the contrarian in the "nuture VS nature" debate since I do believe that the penduluum has gone from the "everything is biological" of the XIXth century to our XXIth century's "everything is social", much to the convenience of political correction. We all are, afterall, social animals. So a little tad more nuance would be in order, me thinks. Racism and social constructs, while very real and still alive, are not the ever-present, omnipotent overwhelming forces that we make them out to be.
People always point to Beyonce and the like and I just don't get it. They do nothing for me. Sorry.
People always point to Beyonce and the like and I just don't get it. They do nothing for me. Sorry.
Pretty much.I think we spend too much time trying to intellectualize something that's mostly chemical.
Pretty much.
I'm basically "color-blind", but I do have preferences. People give themselves too much credit for what they're attracted to, it's weird to me. Regardless, you people are lucky to live in racially diverse countries![]()
i personally don't find black female attractive, save for like rihanna, beyonce, and a few of the actress. probably cuz all the ones i see are just all really...fat
and the ones that aren't fat just...aren't right with teh whole facial features.
then again, ican say the same for most of other skin color too, but they're not as fat i guess
I'm not sure weight is the same thing, but even then, "morbidly obese" has never been considered attractive, same with "skin-and-bones thin". There are traits I consider attractive that are present on different races, I do not believe society told me to find them attractive, to be honest.It isn't mostly chemical however. Society plays a large part in what is or isn't attractive. There are instinct-based attractive traits and there are socially determined attractive traits - thin women were most definitely not the standard of beauty in the 1700's for example. Understanding this is critically important to bettering our society insofar as both self-esteem for many people and why we have our preferences. Note that isn't saying preferences are bad, it's saying we should strive to understand the factors at play.
Because they don't. Scientists don't even like to use the word race, because it is pretty much a social construct. What you should refer to is ethnicity. There is no ethnicity called "black", or "white". Two white people can be more genetically different than a white and a non-white person.
I don't think Beyonce is attractive either. What's your instant reaction to this GIF?
NSFW NSFW NSFW
http://s30.postimg.org/51rdmh8dr/Nathalie_Emmanuel_Sexy.gif
NSFW NSFW NSFW
Hey man whatever you want to tell yourself. The above statement is very suspect.
sure, not specifically why not black women, but you see I have a very narrow specific taste in women. I don't like blondes, I don't like big bones(not necessarily fat), don't like big asses, don't like curly hair and so on. I can appreciate the beauty in every ethnicity/race but I'm only attracted to a specific group of people.Have you ever reflected on why you've never been attracted to a black woman?
And racism isn't limited to dislking certain races.
This is a gross stereotype that borders on being racist.
This is a gross stereotype that borders on being racist.
And I don't find that skin color attractive. I don't even like particularly tan girls.
Keep up this idea that races don't have characteristics that define them though.
I have to like it otherwise, racism. Obviously.
I don't think that's true, the late Baroque period artistically is loaded with depictions of thin women, or at least women in corsets, designed to make them look thin.It isn't mostly chemical however. Society plays a large part in what is or isn't attractive. There are instinct-based attractive traits and there are socially determined attractive traits - thin women were most definitely not the standard of beauty in the 1700's for example. Understanding this is critically important to bettering our society insofar as both self-esteem for many people and why we have our preferences. Note that isn't saying preferences are bad, it's saying we should strive to understand the factors at play.
Africans DON'T have facial characteristics that define them. Are you honestly that fucking dense?
Ethiopians and Somalians (and other West Africans) are not phenotypically comparable to sub-Saharan or West Africans.
And yes, being unattracted to dark skin IS racist, by definition.
I'm not sure weight is the same thing, but even then, "morbidly obese" has never been considered attractive, same with "skin-and-bones thin". There are traits I consider attractive that are present on different races, I do not believe society told me to find them attractive, to be honest.
I don't think that's true, the late Baroque period artistically is loaded with depictions of thin women, or at least women in corsets, designed to make them look thin.
But plenty of people are attracted to people of all shapes. I don't understand why some people's attraction are shaped by society but not other,There are traits that we find attractive instinctively, and there are traits we find attractive based on societal conditioning. Morbidly obese has never been considered attractive, but one can't deny that thin women were not the 'in' group in sexual attractiveness during that period, and it's a prime example of how society can shape our preferences. Hence the view that it's mostly biological is false, society has a large influence as well. I was more replying to the poster you quoted than your post.
I disagree with this (for the record I find all colors attractive). Not being attracted to _______ is not the same as being discriminatory against _______.And yes, being unattracted to dark skin IS racist, by definition.
how is it racist when i'm saying most of the black females i've seen are all fat?
Borders?
Because you are using anecdotal evidence to tie a negative generalization on an entire race. It is racist.
you have a very weird definition of what racism is then