But I'm not talking about you, or any particular individual. I'm arguing that the dominant conceptions of what things are considered attractive are partially shaped by one's culture. This does not mean that your individual experiences in your own life do not shape your individual predilections, or that you've necessarily absorbed these messages unquestioningly. What I'm arguing regarding attitudes of racial attractiveness, and in particular the pattern of denying that black people are attractive, actually fits in well with a broader patterns in racial attitudes vis-a-vis black people.
In the United States, we pick up on a lot of subconscious racism. When respondents are asked to imagine a drug dealer or drug user, 95% imagined a black man. In another study, 60 percent of viewers who watched a story with no image falsely recalled seeing one, and 70 percent of those viewers believed the perpetrator was black. In another study involving a video where photographs of black and white individuals holding either a gun or an innocuous object was placed into various photographic backgrounds demonstrated differences in how respondents reacted to black and white individuals: Participants were told to respond as quickly as possible to decide whether to shoot the target or not, and they consistently mistook the black target as armed when he was not and the white target as unarmed. In the famous doll studies, children were asked to look at dolls that hair and skin aside looked identical to one another, and they showed a clear preference for the white doll because it was perceived as being nicer and being more attractive and having a nicer color. A replication of the study in 2006 found a similar pattern with similar reasons; the children associated the white doll with "pretty" or "good" and the black dolls ith "ugly" or "bad." In 2010, psychologists tested children ages 4 to 5 and ages 9 to 10 about their racial attitudes in a pilot study. They asked children a series of questions and then had them answer by pointing to one of the five cartoon pictures that varied in skin color from light to dark; the older children were also asked a series of questions about a color bar chart that showed light to dark skin. The tests showed that white children, as a group, responded with a high rate of "white bias," identifying the color of their own skin with positive attributes and darker skin with negative attributes. Even black children had some bias towards whiteness, though far less than white children. Researchers suggested that this difference may be ascribed to the fact that parents of color are more willing to address race and racial messages in an explicit way, reframing what their children experience that helps to mitigate those attitudes.
These are broad patterns. I'm sure nearly everyone will say, "Well, I wouldn't have said something racist like that as a child," or, "Well, I wouldn't have imagined that there was a black man in the news story," or, "I wouldn't be more likely to believe the black man is dangerous and shoot him when he was unarmed," and any one individual could well be right. But the numbers suggested that they are probably more lacking in self-awareness than they are devoid of internalized racist attitudes. And when I read a topic on GAF about whether black women are attractive, and I see people arguing vociferously that they've never seen a black woman they found attractive, that these are just "my preferences," that they are unexplained, and these attitudes are widespread and particularly represented among white posters, I see the same attitudes as the kids in the doll experiments, all grown up.
My explanation is that these patterns of attitudes - that black people are criminal, that black people are dangerous, that black people are unattractive, that black people are not as intelligent, that black people are not as good - can be attributed to racial schemas that are learned through the process of socialization and absorption of cultural messages.
What is your alternate explanation for these patterns?