Super Smash Bros. for 3DS & Wii U Thread 8: Put mii in, coach

Except Mii Fighter isn't the name of any of the Miis. It's Mii Swordfighter, Mii Brawler, and Mii Gunner. If a leak had revealed the existence of three "classes" of Mii with customizable movesets, I 'd be more willing to believe it, but it didn't.

It's like saying "Pokemon X/Y" as a prediction and saying that was an accurate leak of Greninja. It is making a broad claim that is almost certain to be true, but doesn't actually rely on any particulars.

Anyways, I'm happy to see Palutena. She fights exactly how I predicted: she uses the powers from KI: Uprising. Considering that in-game they were being cast by her in the first place, it isn't surprising. I'm just wondering how she is using so many. The only other character with that many crazy moves is Megaman.

They called it Mii Fighter in the direct
 
I'm talking about this.

xOM4eu.gif


We don't need more of this shit in games.

Because she has breasts? That isn't anywhere near Bayonetta-level, or even ZSS. She looks fine.
 
GUYS I am getting that Gamecube controller bundle. I am getting TWO gamecube controller bundles. HOLY CRAP GAMECUBE CONTROLLER BUNDLES
 
Because she has breasts? That isn't anywhere near Bayonetta-level, or even ZSS. She looks fine.

It makes sense for Bayonetta because she is a parody of everything wrong with thsi kind of stuff. I'm not even going to go into a ZSS rant, as I could probably write an essay on why I hate that design if given enough time.

I love how one of the thinks that went through their head when it came to revealing a new female fight was making sure they showed off her ass and tits. Gaming is a straight boys club, and that has to stop.
 
Reggie just said there is going to be more Smash news breaking at the roundtable tonight....

How is that not going to be streamed?
 
To be entirely fair, at least it fits Palutena's character. Unlike all the needless ZSS fanservice.
Not at all. ZSS fanservice is just interpretation. This is blatant. That butt scene was so unnecessary. It can be argued that the necklace was the focus in the other part, but there was no other purpose for the butt scene.

This is just a promotional thing and isn't really going to affect the game at least.
 
It's the camera shots of her ass and rack.

At least the red ornament and the necklace draw some of the attention away from just her body. I won't deny it's still a little gratuitous, but it could be way worse. And for a brief reveal trailer that doesn't look like anything in the actual game, I say let it slide.

Yes, and that's the same exact model on 3DS buddy.

Not quite. Look at the belt buckles. Now, maybe they just changed the design slightly (as someone else suggested earlier,) but it still leaves the leak's authenticity up in the air.
 
To be entirely fair, at least it fits Palutena's character. Unlike all the needless ZSS fanservice.

I'm betting we get one more newcomer reveal after the Invitational tonight. I strongly think that Sakurai will take the stage to challenge the winner of the tournament and he will use either his Mii or a brand new newcomer.


What? Wasn't samus in a bikini the first time we saw her without her suit? Also how is it in palutenas character?

Either way I support it
 
Not at all. ZSS fanservice is just interpretation. This is blatant.

I, uh, wait what?

This is promo material that won't crop up in game.

ZSS is Alexis Texas levels of T&A the likes of which has just barely been neared by oft-brought-up-with-very-little-thought five second still images at the ass end of campaigns met with full completion, and that's how she looks all the time in this one
 
Wahhhh I can't handle cheesecake in promotional material that won't even be in the actual game.

I can sympathize with the principle. It's not about the actual game, it's about wondering why said cheesecake was included, especially if that's supposed to be contrary to that "Nintendo style" that Reggie talks about in interviews all the time. When you see it, I don't think it's unreasonable to wonder for a while, "why?"
 
Top Bottom