I find the act of sex repulsive in general, so... I dunno.
Because, if we're talking about gay PDA, it's noticeable and it sends the message that "I can't look at this, it's not normal/it's weird/it's gross." Now imagine seeing people react negatively to you holding hands with or kissing your girlfriend/wife/partner every single day, and tell me that doesn't affect you or make you think twice about expressing affection in public the way straight couples do.
Your solution?
It seems like representation is the issue (which is born from what currently is the majority "norm")
I hope my comparison isn't offense I've but it reminds me a little of the topic in gaming regarding the lack of proper female representation.
I personally think both reactions you described are harmful, and I'm sorry you and your wife have been subjected to that.Not as often (homosexuality is still the niche so to speak), but living in a conservative town, I get reactions for two reasons.
My wife and I are a bi-racial couple.
My wife and I can be affectionate (quick pecks, hugging, looking longingly into each others eyes).
We notice there are people who actively, but politely ignore it and very rarely others that express their disgust aggressively.
I have zero problems with the former, and plenty with the later.
Now of course exacerbate that scenario by a thousand times and I can understand the hesitation from homosexuals. I just don't think that ever changes the former example being offensive.
Sex isn't repulsive to me unless it involves animals or trees or some crazy shit.
NO!Sex is ALWAYS repulsive if you're not attracted to anyone involved. I mean, imagine sex between John Goodman and Rosie O'Donell. Straight or not, ain't nobody wanna see that!
I know in this hypothetical, the person is held as being "not prejudiced in any other way", but there are many subtle ways in which people are prejudiced, not just "the wages of sin are death" type grandiose statements. If your standards for straight couples don't hold for gay couples as far as their dignity and the fullness of their love and humanity are concerned, you are prejudiced. If your standards for straight people don't hold for gay people as far as their dignity and their humanity are concerned, you are prejudiced.
I missed this post.Finding the act of gay sex relevant to any other discussion of homosexuality makes you prejudiced, because you don't need to know about or endorse a straight couple's bedroom behaviour to see them as normal and/or legitimate, so the same ought logically hold for an LBGT relationship. Like, there's pretty unlikely to be some scenario where you're held hostage and forced against your will to watch sex that repulses you, so typically when this conversation comes up it's a straight person unnecessarily sexualizing homosexuality while failing to do the same thing for heterosexuality.
I know in this hypothetical, the person is held as being "not prejudiced in any other way", but there are many subtle ways in which people are prejudiced, not just "the wages of sin are death" type grandiose statements. If your standards for straight couples don't hold for gay couples as far as their dignity and the fullness of their love and humanity are concerned, you are prejudiced. If your standards for straight people don't hold for gay people as far as their dignity and their humanity are concerned, you are prejudiced.
For many of us this is learned whilst growing up, kids using gay as a derogatory term, parents growing up in an era where it wasn't accepted or even talked about, stereotypes on TV, many reasons lead people to not accept something. But once you are out on your own make the effort to just accept people for what makes them happy, not for what makes you comfortable.
Hmm.
I'm Not Sure Maybe We Could Start By Reducing Straight Adhering Adverts?
Yes, I dumped some old-timey adverts there, but see how well they blend in with the modern ones! People see these types of things every day, and it sure as hell influences them. They're sexist, entirely in-your-face, and downright stupid~
EDIT: I'd put on a NSFW warning, but they're adverts. They're fine, apparently.
This. Plus, if anyone's been in any of the world cup threads, you'll know that people are basically posting pictures of women in the stands and, sometimes blatantly, fawning over how they look and critiquing their appearances. It's one of the most overt examples of heteronormativity and misogyny on this site (beside those __ is looking good threads).
He broke up with someone because they liked straight porn? Like, that was the catalyst? (The fact he enjoyed straight sexual imagery, not that act of watching porn.)In college, I knew a guy in the GLBT org who wouldn't date bi guys apparently not out of bigotry, but because he was turned-off/disgusted by the idea of "his" guy getting turned-on by (his words) "vagina sex." The breaking point for him in an earlier relationship was catching his then-bf enjoying straight porn.
Otherwise, he seemed pretty normal/on-the-level towards straight folks. Never a harsh word about them, and he had no shortage of female friends.
Seemed odd to me at the time, but it was a decent learning episode. I saw that it was possible to dislike someone's bedroom activities while keeping that dislike away from other interactions/views/etc.
Of course it doesn't. Plenty of straight people find the idea of homosexual sex acts kind of gross, just as plenty of gay people find the idea of heterosexual sex acts kind of gross. I think in general people find the idea of sex with someone/something they are not attracted to to be kind of gross.
Even anal sex?I find the act of sex repulsive in general, so... I dunno. I would say no...?
Even anal sex?
Why is it gross to you though? What is gross about two men kissing?
A lot of responses here are the typical straight guy responses, and really most people. "It's gross, I don't care though, but I don't want to see it." Big part of the reason why I am still very hesitant to display any type of affection for a guy in public, even hugging.
I would say because unless you have prejudiced feelings towards gay men, you shouldn't find the act of them kissing gross.I didn't say I did find 2 men kissing gross. I'm not bothered by it at all. Infact, I've done it myself (not in a sexual way, more as a joke with a mate). However if you were to put it on a gross scale of 1 to 10, 10 being sick, I'd probably rate it as a 2. I'd also rate a few really old ladies snogging at a 4.
I was asking the guy why he assumed that if a straight guy found it gross, he's also a homophobe.
Hmm.
![]()
I'm
![]()
Not
![]()
Sure
![]()
Maybe
![]()
We
![]()
Could
![]()
Start
![]()
By
![]()
Reducing
![]()
Straight
![]()
Adhering
![]()
Adverts?
Yes, I dumped some old-timey adverts there, but see how well they blend in with the modern ones! People see these types of things every day, and it sure as hell influences them. They're sexist, entirely in-your-face, and downright stupid~
EDIT: I'd put on a NSFW warning, but they're adverts. They're fine, apparently.
I don't think it's a problem when you also see it done the other way around.This. Plus, if anyone's been in any of the world cup threads, you'll know that people are basically posting pictures of women in the stands and, sometimes blatantly, fawning over how they look and critiquing their appearances. It's one of the most overt examples of heteronormativity and misogyny on this site (beside those __ is looking good threads).
He broke up with someone because they liked straight porn? Like, that was the catalyst? (The fact he enjoyed straight sexual imagery, not that act of watching porn.)
I would classify that as bigotry.
Idk I don't know any gay men that find things like heterosexual kissing to be gross. But many straight men find gay kissing gross. I think that's cultural.
I'm sorry you have to deal with that bullshit. That's not OK.Not as often (homosexuality is still the niche so to speak), but living in a conservative town, I get reactions for two reasons.
My wife and I are a bi-racial couple.
My wife and I can be affectionate (quick pecks, hugging, looking longingly into each others eyes).
We notice there are people who actively, but politely ignore it and very rarely others that express their disgust aggressively.
I have zero problems with the former, and plenty with the later.
Now of course exacerbate that scenario by a thousand times and I can understand the hesitation from homosexuals. I just don't think that ever changes the former example being offensive.
I don't think straight men's aversion to gay male sex is based on the fact that they're not attracted to men. I think it's because they view gay male sex/porn as legitimate and not some fantasy in which to insert themselves, and the opposite holds true for lesbian sex/porn.
Public figures choose to be in the spotlight, and that comes with scrutiny, whether good or bad. (And that's not to say I think talking about how attractive a celebrity is should be discouraged, heck, I do it all the time, just look at my avatar.) Ogling celebs is not quite the same as picking out random women in a crowd to drool over.I don't think it's a problem when you also see it done the other way around.
Look a this thread and how everyone fawns over the magician.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=830974
The pervert in me wants to fight you on this, but honestly, I agree.
It's not a heterosexual problem more than it is a decency problem. Those ads are terrible if bill boarded for the general public
Finding the act of gay sex relevant to any other discussion of homosexuality makes you prejudiced, because you don't need to know about or endorse a straight couple's bedroom behaviour to see them as normal and/or legitimate, so the same ought logically hold for an LBGT relationship.
Well other example would be the "Hot prison guy" who obviously didn't choose to be a public figure. And I don't mean to say that it's on the same level, but maybe that it's on it's way there. I don't think it's wrong to fawn over some random people over the internet and instead of avoiding it I'd rather have both genders treated that way.Public figures choose to be in the spotlight, and that comes with scrutiny, whether good or bad. (And that's not to say I think talking about how attractive a celebrity is should be discouraged, heck, I do it all the time, just look at my avatar.) Ogling celebs is not quite the same as picking out random women in a crowd to drool over.
And the degree in which males are subject to appraisals of their sexual appeal is still no where close to how much it affects women.
And the 'inconvenient truth' is.... They are billboarded for the general public. Where I am, we have different yet generally similar advertisements put everywhere. It's somewhat shocking...
I definitely agree that it should be equal between genders.Well other example would be the "Hot prison guy" who obviously didn't choose to be a public figure. And I don't mean to say that it's on the same level, but maybe that it's on it's way there. I don't think it's wrong to fawn over some random people over the internet and instead of avoiding it I'd rather have both genders treated that way.
It's not that simple.Public figures choose to be in the spotlight, and that comes with scrutiny, whether good or bad.
He could be asexual. Or some people just don't like sex.
laughing at these "2 dudes kissing is gross but TWO GIRLS MAKING OUT IS SO HOT DUDE" responses though, really shows the male centered homophobia and hypocrisy the world is known for.