You talked to them huh.
Size isn't necessarily relevant. LA has all kind of food deserts still today directly attributable to the Rodney King riots driving out small grocery/bodega businesses.
Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds
- Thread starter jordan0386
- Start date
- Status
You talked to them huh.
Size isn't necessarily relevant. LA has all kind of food deserts still today directly attributable to the Rodney King riots driving out small grocery/bodega businesses.
Boom Boom Pow
Banned
Fixed. You know it's gonna happen. And it'll just reassert world stereotypes that all black people do is commit crimes. which is a shame.
benjipwns
Banned
They all look the same.
Fnord
Member
Various ages, but rarely are they all that old. Police are quite well equipped (TOO well equipped in some regards) in the US.
Sub_Level
wants to fuck an Asian grill.
Maybe what you saw was Katrina but an altercation did happen at a walmart. Shots fired.
That's why it's important to take everything you see reported on Twitter with a grain of salt. It's very easy to put out misinformation.
Sub_Level
wants to fuck an Asian grill.
Live stream for the new page: http://fox2now.com/on-air/live-streaming/
Rastafarian42
Member
This shit is getting ridiculous at this point.
Yeah, I know. But since none of the "news networks" on TV are covering this I have to get info somewhere.
Definitely. Peaceful protest earlier:
And then somehow that metamorphosed into this:
kame-sennin
Member
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Bread_Riots
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...s-ElBaradei-tells-Mubarak-to-leave-today.html
The fact is, people started complaining that "riots accomplish nothing!". Evidence was shown that this is not always the case. Now people are backpedaling and saying some riots are have noble elements, but these are just selfish looters. The people making these statements have no knowledge of the history of civil uprisings. Their opinions are not based on facts. What this is about is looking down on black communities for behaving in an "uncivilized" manor. People want to judge black people for using violence to express their anger, but remain silent when the police repeatedly inflict violence on the black community. It's criticizing the bullied for lashing out, and it's pathetic. If you hate riots that do damage to impoverished communities, then direct your anger at the capitalist state and violent police force that created these conditions. Does anyone remember when this thread was about a dead teenager?
Well I mean, what kind of response is that? Have you talked to them?
I would ask you to look at it logically but it seems you like you may have trouble with that.
Again not sure the relevance of these events. Whether it's a response to, or taking advantage of, the current situation, it's despicable, fruitless and selfish.
I'm waiting on confirmation for that. There was a post about it in the reddit feed but no further info has been reported.
Until someone gets shot for a dehumanising stare / holding a puppy.
vas_a_morir
Banned
Said they dishonored the memory of their son, and that they only want justice.
Clockwork5
Member
People here are defending the looters? Gross.
Do you have trouble reading a sentence or two and actually responding to it?
Whaaa....
I'll wait for the news station to confirm that, because that is beyond belief.
'Reading'
You assigned motives to people from exactly nothing and then called it logic. That's not how it works. You know at most *what* happened, but probably not been that. You have no more access to *why* it happened than anyone else who isn't there.
No not from nothing.
We have facts. We have a person shot in what people consider to be an injust way by a large majority of a community in St. Louis. We have people peacefully protesting the way the police department handled the entire situation. We have people breaking into businesses and other places and taking materials from these businesses.
If we look at it logically, which is why I used that word logic by the way, we can conclude that the two groups of people have different motives that may come from the same frustration or may not. However, there is nothing to be gained by the peaceful protesters in violently looting and destroying people's property. This will not change how the police handle these situations in the future which is something I'd assume they'd want.
I welcome discussion, but gotta say, you've been really dismissive and snarky and it's going to confuse the issue into a more ad hominem thing which I'm sure no one here really wants.
From the reddit live stream:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=2608817702098
Police swarming some people parked in a parking lot
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=2608817702098
Police swarming some people parked in a parking lot
kame-sennin
Member
Probably related to the looting and reports on the same feed of people with guns parked in a parking lot.
NEOPARADIGM
Banned
"Every day I'm in jail."
Yea ... Can't blame the police for their actions there
Bruce Lee Kicks
Member
I live in North County St. Louis right now. This situation is outta control.
kame-sennin
Member
Another good example of the police provoking riots that will be completely ignored.
The looters are no better than the crooked cops. How does this make it safer to live in the neighborhood that Michale's family lives in? The family and protesters are tired of police treating their community like a warzone so some of the people decide to take advantage of the situation and turn the community into a warzone.
Who do you think that family is more afraid of tonight?
CountBlack
Member
the fuck a peaceful protest ever do?
Sweet. And all we had to do was destroy and loot some private property? I mean, if I knew that's what it would take to get whitey's attention I would have started advocating that a lot sooner. It's good to know these shortcuts in case you get tired of begging politicians for reform.
NEOPARADIGM
Banned
"You want to treat us like we're the enemy, we'll be the fucking enemy" is what I see, and it's not a foreign or unrelatable idea at all.
kame-sennin
Member
Well you see, if you work with the state you can organize a peaceful
Power yields nothing without a demand.
"What anybody here wants" is the least relevant thing.
You cannot conclude these two groups have "different motives", only that they have different approaches. Sure, there could be some opportunism here. Or it could be some MLK vs Malcolm X situation. Some people maintain quiet composure, some lash out,
It's all great to believe the former is better than the latter. I tend to think so. But you're still assigning motives and that isn't appropriate.
You've called this situation "fruitless" but how can you even declare that some paltry hours into the disobedience? It's literally impossible to say if these actions will bear fruit yet. Your whole thing is an argument from prejudice.
None of which is to say these riots are even "good". Sometimes people do bad shit when they're up against the wall. Are these people rioting otherwise "good"? Is "otherwise good" even a useful concept? Is violence never justified? You've never even gotten to these questions.
SPOILER ALERT:
racism
kame-sennin
Member
If an occupying army treats your community like a warzone, that means you're at war. Pretending otherwise makes you an idiot.
That was tense. Probably would have been a good time to turn the music down.
I go back and forth about holding a cell phone out in a situation like that. It is dark and extremely tense and may be mistaken, but filming it is incredibly useful.
Conor_Fool
Banned
I am a St. Louisan but I live in Denver. This is fucking wild.
benjipwns
Banned
Just as a note, MLK wasn't a pacifist, he argued many times in favor of the use of violence towards self-defense against injustice if necessary.
His disagreement with Malcom X and others was on the effectiveness of various protest tactics.
EDIT: Ghandi also said in not so many words that if it was anybody else but the UK with its history of liberalism he would have had to turn to violence.
His disagreement with Malcom X and others was on the effectiveness of various protest tactics.
EDIT: Ghandi also said in not so many words that if it was anybody else but the UK with its history of liberalism he would have had to turn to violence.
Only if you are at war with the occupying army, that's not happening here. If this community is being treated like a war zone by an occupying force, why are they sabotaging their own community? It's the equivalent of blowing up your own water and electric plants because you are simply at war.
Right here Police are just going from store to store trying to stop these people from trashing the entire city.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked