I know, but your presumption that they are primarily concerned with the fact that there was a riot reflects your preoccupations. You keep trying to change the subject from the death to the rioting, as if the rioting is a bigger issue. I don't know why you're more preoccupied with people rioting over yet another young black man being killed than you are about the fact that yet another young black man has been killed. But you are. If you weren't, you wouldn't keep trying to present that as the issue here.
It seems more likely, given the fact that in 2012 forty-two percent of the FBI's total civil rights caseload involved color of law issues including excessive force, false arrest and fabrication of evidence and failure to keep from harm, given that the federal government is already monitoring thirteen municipalities because of widespread abuses of the aforementioned, given that there have been dozens upon dozens of black men killed in similar fashion in the last few years and this has resulted in a situation where the police investigation is going to be viewed as inherently untrustworthy, it makes more sense to argue that this is about a) making sure that the local investigation is trustworthy, b) lending credibility to whatever findings that the investigations ultimately come to. The riots fit into that analysis, but it's reductive to attempt to claim that the riots are why the FBI is coming.
