Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
Either this Anon group has significant evidence that this man is a police officer and the departments response was a bluff, or they are taking a huge risk at putting an innocent man into the fire.

But, would an innocent man attempt to change his name and occupation on Facebook...?

They never risk ANYTHING. They're anonymous in some of the truest senses of the word and constantly get shit like this wrong and never face any consequences for it.

It's completely irresponsible to follow anything they have to say as they're likely wrong.
 
If I was a cop in Ferguson I'd change my Facebook info too.

Doesn't prove anything.

Your name, too? Maybe I find that as a personal stretch. I think the only people who would be caught in the crossfire are those with the occupation, and that I can see. Guilty by association and all of that.

Then again, I don't have Facebook, so maybe all of this is alien to me.

They never risk ANYTHING. They're anonymous in some of the truest senses of the word and constantly get shit like this wrong and never face any consequences for it.

It's completely irresponsible to follow anything they have to say as they're likely wrong.

They clearly have risked something; the life of who the man they chose to name. Whether or not that's a cop.
 
Either this Anon group has significant evidence that this man is a police officer and the departments response was a bluff, or they are taking a huge risk at putting an innocent man into the fire.

But, would an innocent man attempt to change his name and occupation on Facebook...?

Huge risk?

Anonymous is a bunch of faceless, nameless people with disparate opinions and motives. There is no risk for them. It's why they're not focused on being accurate, they're focused on stoking flames.
 
Even if it was the real person, they would be denying it anyway. An easy way to stop innocent people's info from getting out there is to put out the real person's name out yourself.
 
So wait, what's the police version of what happened now that there's video of him being shot at from within the car?

1. Police roll up to a black kid to have a nice civil conversation.

2. When he rolls down his window, this black kid lunges through it in an attempt to grab the officers gun, police fire in self-defense.

3. Same thing happens when the kid is 15 feet away outside of the car. All cops know black kids move fast.
Even if he was moving in the opposite direction.

Something like that?
 
Even if they did tweet that, I would be skeptical... they'll lie to protect the officer's identity if Anon has the right one.

And Anon will lie to protect their credibility if they have the wrong one. They do it all the time.

That's completely plausible.

That's the worst part about it. As I was typing that out I was like: "I don't know if that's enough to occam's razor this video... :("

They clearly have risked something; the life of who the man they chose to name. Whether or not that's a cop.

They don't give a shit. They're terrible people.
 
Your name, too? Maybe I find that as a personal stretch. I think the only people who would be caught in the crossfire are those with the occupation, and that I can see. Guilty by association and all of that.

Then again, I don't have Facebook, so maybe all of this is alien to me.
I removed the college I went to after they started getting involved in some stuff I disagreed with.

Would you want anyone to know you work for Ferguson PD right now?
 
So wait, what's the police version of what happened now that there's video of him being shot at from within the car?

1. Police roll up to a black kid to have a nice civil conversation.

2. When he rolls down his window, this black kid lunges through it in an attempt to grab the officers gun, police fire in self-defense.

3. Same thing happens when the kid is 15 feet away outside of the car. All cops know black kids move fast.
Even if he was moving in the opposite direction.

Something like that?

Where's that video? I haven't seen one that started before him already being shot.
 
They don't give a shit. They're terrible people.

The irony of Anon is that they like to decry bullying, but end up being some of the biggest bullies around. They release inaccurate and incorrect information quite often, with little regard for the consequences and collateral damage.
 
So wait, what's the police version of what happened now that there's video of him being shot at from within the car?

1. Police roll up to a black kid to have a nice civil conversation.

2. When he rolls down his window, this black kid lunges through it in an attempt to grab the officers gun, police fire in self-defense.

3. Same thing happens when the kid is 15 feet away outside of the car. All cops know black kids move fast.
Even if he was moving in the opposite direction.

Something like that?

Wait, there's video of the confrontation itself?
 
"This idea of no racial profiling," King said, "I've seen the video. It looks to me like you don't need to bother with that particular factor because they all appear to be of a single origin, I should say, a continental origin might be the way to phrase that."

"I just reject race-based politics, identity politics" King concluded. "I think we're all God's children. We all should be held to the same standards and the same level of behavior
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/conte...al-profiling-not-concern#sthash.YgrAdvt2.dpuf
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.
 
I removed the college I went to after they started getting involved in some stuff I disagreed with.

Would you want anyone to know you work for Ferguson PD right now?

Like I said, I can see occupation. But why name, too? I am not claiming he is what is being claimed he is, but I find that to be a little odd to change. Maybe his name outs him as a major officer but perhaps not the person claimed?

In fact, if there is a video of the shooting, does the officer's appearance even match the guy in images? Surely that's not a hard thing to piece together. That could easily debunk this.
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.

Have you tried simply google image searching the supposed picture?

That's usually enough to debunk stuff like that.
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.

I don't think there's been anything debunking it. It's kinda tough to prove a negative immediately. I'd ask them where the photo came from, and even if it is legit, why does owning a gun mean someone should be killed? Seems that's against the second amendment.

Or just defriend them.
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.
Did the same thing to Trayvon.
 
Like I said, I can see occupation. But why name, too? I am not claiming he is what is being claimed he is, but I find that to be a little odd to change. Maybe his name outs him as a major officer but perhaps not the person claimed?

In fact, if there is a video of the shooting, does the officer's appearance even match the guy in images? Surely that's not a hard thing to piece together. That could easily debunk this.
Lots of people have different names on facebook. Good way to hide from certain people/ your employer.
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.

fuck difference does it make. Racists are always going to try to quantify a black man's death by finding an image that portrays him in a stereotypical way.

Respond with a photo of the bundy ranch, or neckbeard in starbucks holding an AR-15 while smiling for the camera.
 
Don't respond at all. If their justification for him being murdered is that he deserved it for posing in a picture, than they're willfully being obtuse. There's no getting to them. Hell, if they're justifying his murder at all you know they don't respond to common sense.
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.

Not worth it.

Though if you want to be super salty, you could ask them whether his alleged crimes of eating money and drinking the swill that is Hawaiian Punch justify him getting shot

Ambulance is for human beings.

Reading this made me very angry, due to the actual possibility of someone thinking this.
 
Hey guys, there is a picture circulating my facebook that idiots are claiming is michael brown, he is holding a gun pointed at the camera, with money in his mouth, and Hawaiian punch punch on the table.

Is there anything like snopes debunking this photo, I would love to rub it in their racist faces if it is.
Go through their pictures and find a picture of them holding a gun. Shouldn't be that hard to find one.
 
Have you tried simply google image searching the supposed picture?

That's usually enough to debunk stuff like that.
i did try googling it.

I don't think there's been anything debunking it. It's kinda tough to prove a negative immediately. I'd ask them where the photo came from, and even if it is legit, why does owning a gun mean someone should be killed? Seems that's against the second amendment.

fuck difference does it make. Racists are always going to try to quantify a black man's death by finding an image that portrays him in a stereotypical way.

Respond with a photo of the bundy ranch, or neckbeard in starbucks holding an AR-15 while smiling for the camera.
because getting in a long winded argument with ignorant racist on facebook is a losing proposition, I've found they have a hard time arguing against facts.VS "my opinion" which will be "wrong."


Or just defriend them.
i'm about it, but its hard to de-friend family.

Did the same thing to Trayvon.
i know, but snopes had an article debunking it and i sent it out, pissed them off.


you guys are very on top of things here, so i figured I'd ask. I personally know that the photo is meaningless and certainly doesnt mean someone deserves to die.
 
Do you feel it's wrong on the individual to feel this, or the circumstances that can make one reason to feel such a way?

Hm. This one's tough to me. If I had to narrow it down, I think it's absolutely unacceptable in this situation. So it would be a little bit of both?

I'm really curious as to what he is going to say about this. I really hope he doesn't try to justify the actions being taken towards these people.

There is 0% chance of that.

What Tama said. I don't think he's handing out pats on the back today.
 

I'm sure we'll hear some weak ass shit about how our hearts are with the people in ferguson, etc etc etc


If this was going on in any other country there'd be STRONG condemnation of the police taking military action against it's own citizens and arresting its press. This whole situation is bullshit and the world has every right to point it's fingers and laugh at those of us who thought our situation was vastly different from theirs.



i did try googling it.



because getting in a long winded argument with ignorant racist on facebook is a losing proposition, I've found they have a hard time arguing against facts.VS "my opinion" which will be "wrong."

I get it my man, but life is just too damn short. You're going to expend all this energy arguing with people who've already moved goalposts in the face of objectivity in the past, just for them to move the goal posts again and think what they choose in spite of a sound argument?
 
If this was going on in any other country there'd be STRONG condemnation of the police taking military action against it's own citizens and arresting its press. This whole situation is bullshit and the world has every right to point it's fingers and laugh at those of us who thought our situation was vastly different from theirs.
The rest of the world understands that black people are apparently subcitizens to some whites in the US. We are not surprised.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom