From the reports..
Those are some grainy pics. CNN said he had the same cloths as that guy.
The language in these statements makes me crazy. Police never shoot people, they're just involved in shootings.
is it him?
It was mentioned at the time of the shooting, I can remember people saying he was shot for stealing some sweets?
Well, the PD is getting exactly what they wanted. Already your seeing reports of if he was tied to the robbery or not. PD wants to spin this another way, and the media is going to pick it up on it for sure.
A local station cleared that up here as no disciplinary action PREVIOUSLY in his 6 years. As I type this they just said it again coming back from commercial.
Well, news to me and I've been keeping up for a while.
Any exact quote from Sat/Sun?
Let's say for the sake of argument that this guy actually did rob the store of Swisher Sweets.
Let's say that he even beat up the store clerk.
Why should he have been executed in cold blood and not detained/arrested like everyone else?
This is the shit that makes Angelus' posts so valid and real. That covert racism, that dogwhistle stuff...that's going to corrupt the ideas that this event in Ferguson, and the event in Staten Island w/the NYPD made people think about. They're going to ignore the systematic injustices that make a black male's life in America worth less, or sometimes worthless. Instead, they're going to say that he was a "criminal" and deserved to die.
A pack of dollar store cigars.
Some candy and iced tea.
Loud music.
A stare.
That's all it takes, and that's all we're worth.
The death was still unjustified regardless...this is textbook smear the victim a la Trayvon Martin.
Just saw someone post pretty much the same thing, but I'll keep it here anyway...
![]()
Ask yourself this: "Would Brown really wear socks with sandals?"
It's clearly not Brown in the video.
The clothes match when he was shot, but why on earth was this not released earlier!?
Something smells fishy here......
3:54 PM PT: The reports include an accusation that the unarmed young man stole candy from a Quick Trip prior to being shot. Most news organizations are concentrating on the 100 or so people who have congregated to protest the police shooting.
I'm not sure taking $30 worth of merchandise is legally considered robbery. That looks like assault and shoplifting.
Fox News so happy right now.
Didn't the store owner already say shortly after the shooting that Mike Brown wasn't involved?
Well this is over. He shoplifted so the killing is going to be justified. I'm fucking sick right now.
I don't know why, but I have a feeling the PD held off on this just so they could get what they believe is their sweet little victory.
"Oh, yeah, let them go out and protest this shooting. Yeah, he's so innocent, just wait until we bring this out!"
Its probably why the Chief refused to take questions. He's probably back at the station right now with the other cops smiling ear to ear watching this unfold.
I'm not sure taking $30 worth of merchandise is legally considered robbery. That looks like assault and shoplifting.
Missouri Revised Statutes
Section 569.030
Robbery in the second degree.
1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property.
2. Robbery in the second degree is a class B felony.
That's pretty much what it sounds like which makes my blood BOIL.
They're trying to turn the tides and frankly, I hope this doesn't happen.
Most news organizations are concentrating on the 100 or so people who have congregated to protest the police shooting.From page 1:
Didn't the store owner already say shortly after the shooting that Mike Brown wasn't involved?
even assuming that's him, YOU STILL DON'T GET TO SHOOT HIM