Eh, I've heard it before. It basically means physical altercation, no weapons.
The fact that the witness gave his testimony to the FBI and not Ferguson should give you an indicator of how this is going to go.
That DA is getting it from all sides. This is a career defining decision.
semi graphic pic, with excellent caption / point attached
http://i.imgur.com/wMI811J.png
semi graphic pic
http://i.imgur.com/wMI811J.png
Again, the hat is in photos released. I can't find a direct link, it just goes to the gallery:
http://www.ksdk.com/media/cinematic/gallery/13835707/police-shooting-at-canfield-green-apartments/
For what, having a conflicting view point than yours? I've not posted anything wrong, the only thing I'm doing is taking a different perspective.
Seeing as how brown had no problem assaulting a tiny elderly person,
Well the police are playing extremely high stakes poker here if that turns out to not be him...
Lol the whole police force in that town is incompetent. Fire them all please.
semi graphic pic, with excellent caption / point attached
http://i.imgur.com/wMI811J.png
Again, the hat is in photos released. I can't find a direct link, it just goes to the gallery:
http://www.ksdk.com/media/cinematic/gallery/13835707/police-shooting-at-canfield-green-apartments/
So it was just a really bad call by the officer in question, I guess.
Unless he actually tried to go for the officer's gun, right? Would that have warranted lethal force?
Again, the hat is in photos released. I can't find a direct link, it just goes to the gallery:
http://www.ksdk.com/media/cinematic/gallery/13835707/police-shooting-at-canfield-green-apartments/
semi graphic pic, with excellent caption / point attached
http://i.imgur.com/wMI811J.png
Here are two others but closer up: (NSFW)
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vPmMxCiraQA/0.jpg
http://allhiphop.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/michael-brown-ferguson-shooting.jpg?w=522&h=423
Strongarm is not shop lifting. Strongarm is an old term.Never heard the term "strongarm" robbery before. Scary way to say shoplifting
Never heard the term "strongarm" robbery before. Scary way to say shoplifting
What I'm confused about is if Johnson was making statements all this time, why was this "robbery" never mentioned or spoken about? You would think that Johnson would give context as to why the officer stopped them but I don't see it mentioned anywhere.
Its all talk about the shooting but nothing about what happened prior to it. I would think that if Johnson knew they had done something beforehand, that he would've mentioned it SOMEWHERE to any of the people he spoke to, whether it be family or friends or his lawyer or anyone who interviewed him....
he stopped running when he got the first shot and turned around in a surrender pose with arms up.
there are not excuses for the following bullets that came afterwards.
cop is guilty, period
he stopped running when he got the first shot and turned around in a surrender pose with arms up.
there are not excuses for the following bullets that came afterwards.
cop is guilty, period
I'm so glad we get to waste our time trying to figure out if the victim was guilty of a minor crime that has no bearing on everything we know about the case so far in terms of the officer's responsibility and negligence instead of, you know, focusing on the extreme use of force and general incompetence of said officer and the entire local police department down there.
:/
he stopped running when he got the first shot and turned around in a surrender pose with arms up.
there are not excuses for the following bullets that came afterwards.
cop is guilty, period
I've asked countless time, where a source for this?
Is it eye witness stuff?
Why would anyone admit they were involved in a crime?
It's the same guy
Same weird pattern on shoes/sandals, same length shorts, hat is here
![]()
he stopped running when he got the first shot and turned around in a surrender pose with arms up.
there are not excuses for the following bullets that came afterwards.
cop is guilty, period
A guy on CNN (didn't catch his name) is saying it is legal to shoot a fleeing felon. Since he was a robbery suspect, I guess that means he is a felon? Being a suspect walking down the street makes you a felon...
Anyway, he seems confident the cop was in the right. If these are the laws, they need to be changed immediately.
Hey guys, lets get the real character assassination going
![]()
A guy on CNN (didn't catch his name) is saying it is legal to shoot a fleeing felon. Since he was a robbery suspect, I guess that means he is a felon? Being a suspect walking down the street makes you a felon...
Anyway, he seems confident the cop was in the right. If these are the laws, they need to be changed immediately.
A guy on CNN (didn't catch his name) is saying it is legal to shoot a fleeing felon. Since he was a robbery suspect, I guess that means he is a felon? Being a suspect walking down the street makes you a felon...
Anyway, he seems confident the cop was in the right. If these are the laws, they need to be changed immediately.
A guy on CNN (didn't catch his name) is saying it is legal to shoot a fleeing felon. Since he was a robbery suspect, I guess that means he is a felon? Being a suspect walking down the street makes you a felon...
Anyway, he seems confident the cop was in the right. If these are the laws, they need to be changed immediately.
People need to be asking these questions and we need answers. This whole thing just feels off
A guy on CNN (didn't catch his name) is saying it is legal to shoot a fleeing felon. Since he was a robbery suspect, I guess that means he is a felon? Being a suspect walking down the street makes you a felon...
Anyway, he seems confident the cop was in the right. If these are the laws, they need to be changed immediately.
I don't know what's sadder, the Ferguson PD wanting to fabricate a cheap excuse to shoot Brown dead simply by listing him as a suspect, or the fact that the media and society will buy into this shit hook line and sinker.
semi graphic pic, with excellent caption / point attached
http://i.imgur.com/wMI811J.png
Fleeing felon rules normally have to come with a condition that the suspect was also a danger to others or to the officer. If there was a confrontation that occurred between the officer and Brown, and a physical attack was made, I can see where they would be arguing this position.
Dorian Johnson's attorney confirmed that brown stole the cigars. There's not much to figure out.
What? No it doesn't.Assaulting a police officer would make you a felon.
Really need the facts to come out.
Supposedly he reached for the gun and punched the officer in the face.
If he did have his hands up and surrendering though he is not really fleeing anymore so I can't see how it would be justified.
Dorian Johnson's attorney confirmed that brown stole the cigars. There's not much to figure out.
I'm so glad we get to waste our time trying to figure out if the victim was guilty of a minor crime that has no bearing on everything we know about the case so far in terms of the officer's responsibility and negligence instead of, you know, focusing on the extreme use of force and general incompetence of said officer and the entire local police department down there.
:/
To some extent, even 'playing this game' with them is letting them change the narrative. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE WAS THE ONE IN THE VIDEO. They are trying to get Brown's defenders on the defensive so we stop point out this fact.
(Not yelling at you, it was for emphasis).