Have you done the ALS ice bucket challenge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 102481
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's supposed to be fun/funny.

What does more good - me donating $100 or tagging a bunch of people and getting them to donate and/or tag a bunch more people to do the same thing?

This is how I view it. I first heard about it when Edelman did it and then a few people on FB did it, then it caught like wildfire. A bunch of celebs, daily talk show hosts, sports figures/entire teams have participated. Plus like half my friends on FB have done it. I think most people enjoy calling out their family/friends to pour ice water on themselves.

All in all, it's for a good cause, and it has made a lot of money for the cause. And people get to get their friends wet. Who doesn't like to get their friends wet?
 
I think its a good cause. It hasn't caught on here, I only know of celebrities doing it, but even if people are donating because it's trendy and to make themselves look good what's the problem with that?

I hadn't heard of ALS before the challenge started, and now I have, so it's doing its job.
 
waiting for the inevitable campaign to get clean water to those in need in ~1000 years. Then we can use this to showcase what we did to ourselves. "THEY DUMPED HOW MANY GALLONS ON THEIR OWN HEADS? AND THEN LAUGHED ABOUT IT?"


I hate ALS and am glad it's raised as much money as it has.
 
People who are cynical about this, are just that... cynical.

Or they hate fun. The argument that this whole thing has been, in the end, a bad thing because it takes away from other charities is one of the most asinine things I've ever heard.

Anyway, I haven't done it myself, no one's nominated me yet, but I've filmed a fair share of them at this point. I donated 50 dollars as well because whatever.

Also Jesus...the cynics in this thread...

a.aaa-No-fun-allowed..jpg
 
Got challenged multiple times.

Ignored it.

Donated nothing.

Furthermore, ignored the reminders with links to absurdly-outdated memes that are more irritating than clever or witty. All your base, all the time.
 
Am I allowed to be cynical about how absolutely dumbed down its become as it spreads?

It went from getting attention about a disease and a charity, and how to contribute. To seeing dozens and dozens of posts that don't even mention ALS, just videos of people doing reverse dunk tanks for fun. And that is definitely a problem.
 
Am I allowed to be cynical about how absolutely dumbed down its become as it spreads?

It went from getting attention about a disease and a charity, and how to contribute. To seeing dozens and dozens of posts that don't even mention ALS, just videos of people doing reverse dunk tanks for fun. And that is definitely a problem.

Not if it keeps raising money. How much awareness was being raised before this started? The logic being employed here stinks.
 
I personally have not and wouldn't even if I was challenged. Most of the people who I've seen do it are approaching it as a chain letter. One girl (an ex-girlfriend actually) said something like, "Thanks, Kelly, you bitch, for nominating me for this," and then proceeded to dump water on her head without mentioning the cause or anything. Like every other viral charity awareness campaign, it's been diluted to the point where it doesn't mean anything.
 
I personally have not and wouldn't even if I was challenged. Most of the people who I've seen do it are approaching it as a chain letter. One girl (an ex-girlfriend actually) said something like, "Thanks, Kelly, you bitch, for nominating me for this," and then proceeded to dump water on her head without mentioning the cause or anything. Like every other viral charity awareness campaign, it's been diluted to the point where it doesn't mean anything.

Except for the $15+ million raised to fight the disease so far. So yeah, pretty much nothing.
 
Not if it keeps raising money. How much awareness was being raised before this started? The logic being employed here stinks.

Seriously. How many people even knew that Lou Gehrig's Disease was ALS before this?

People care way too much about the act itself. This is similar to the people who hate Penny Arcade getting people to contribute to charities because "they should be more humble about it and not try to be such primadonnas when it comes to helping other people. That's what charity is right?"
 
This seems like a big distraction, who started this anyway?

Yeah, this big damn distraction gave the foundation millions more than before. What worthless waste of time, am I right?

Got challenged multiple times.

Ignored it.

Donated nothing.

Furthermore, ignored the reminders with links to absurdly-outdated memes that are more irritating than clever or witty. All your base, all the time.

Hey there, watch it with that edge. You might accidentally cut yourself.

Am I allowed to be cynical about how absolutely dumbed down its become as it spreads?

It went from getting attention about a disease and a charity, and how to contribute. To seeing dozens and dozens of posts that don't even mention ALS, just videos of people doing reverse dunk tanks for fun. And that is definitely a problem.

Plenty of people on my Facebook linked to the organization, or at least used the hashtag.

There's nothing to indicate that it gets "dumbed down" just because it gets bigger. In fact, as a link in a previous post shows, they've gained way more funding this way than before. Your sample size and even mine don't stand for a good enough reflection on how it helps - the numbers show that, and it is.

The real problem here is how cynical people are about a trend that's actively helping people and in no way harming the core point.
 
Except for the $15+ million raised to fight the disease so far. So yeah, pretty much nothing.

Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, but it's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.

What about the people who don't actually donate as part of the challenge? They're taking advantage of a charity for their own celebrity.
 
Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, but it's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.

This is concern trolling at its worst. Cynicism sucks but stupid, illogical, harmful cynicism sucks more.

What about the people who don't actually donate as part of the challenge? They're taking advantage of a charity for their own celebrity.

At worst they raise awareness.
 
Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, but it's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.

What about the people who don't actually donate as part of the challenge? They're taking advantage of a charity for their own celebrity.

It's still raising money and awareness. If some people are doing it for the wrong reasons then so be it, maybe that's what you have to do these days to get mainstream exposure.

People are having silly fun with it while directly or indirectly contributing to a good cause.
 
Yeah, this big damn distraction gave the foundation millions more than before. What worthless waste of time, am I right?[/B]

You should calm down a bit. I never said it was a waste of time, I simply speculated that it seems like a distraction. Sorry that you are offended by a bit of skepticism. All the sarcasm will make it better, am I right?
 
Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, butit's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.
That's the thing though... who cares? Certainly the ones who are helped by the amount of money they're getting, do not. The self-perception of people, their egos and whatnot is really the least interesting or important thing here. Everyyone should treat that side of the whole issue as what it is, trivial.
 
My grandmother was taken by this nasty disease. My dad donates so I don't have to :P

and yeah, I watched the video of some person doing the challenge. Big whoop, I do it in my shower all the time, give me money.
 
the bucket symbolizes the metaphorical wool being pulled over our eyes by our corporate masters. it's an illuminati thing.

can't fault them for raising awareness about ALS, though.
 
This article on the topic is good -- http://m.vice.com/read/dumping-a-bucket-of-ice-on-your-head-does-not-make-you-a-philanthropist-813

More money for any cause is good -- but people dumping water instead of donating is not.

Not the dumb vice article again. Raising awareness is absolutely a good thing, and the charities benefitting from this campaign will all tell you that. Whether you donate, raise awareness or do both, it means more money for these organizations fighting this disease.
 
Done it and donated. Must have started here in the Northeast because my FB has been flooded with them for weeks now.
Put a funnel down my shorts and brought the pain.
 
Got challenged and donated 50$. I posted a screen shot of the email confirmation when I donated instead of dumping ice water on my head. Raising awareness is good and all, but if you're going to accept the challenge then you should donate something. Posting a video dumping water over your head doesn't prove you donated anything and I'll assume you did it just for fb likes.
 
Got challenged and donated 50$. I posted a screen shot of the email confirmation when I donated instead of dumping ice water on my head. Raising awareness is good and all, but if you're going to accept the challenge then you should donate something. Posting a video dumping water over your head doesn't prove you donated anything and I'll assume you did it just for fb likes.

You can do both.

Most people I've seen do this have done both.

Everyone I've personally filmed has done both.
 
You should calm down a bit. I never said it was a waste of time, I simply speculated that it seems like a distraction. Sorry that you are offended by a bit of skepticism. All the sarcasm will make it better, am I right?

A distraction from what, though? This whole thing was started by a man, Peter Frates I think, who has ALS. I first saw this on my FB feed when Julian Edelman took part in it. I really didn't think it would catch on, but here we are, a few weeks later, talking about it.

Why not just donate money instead of folks making this about themselves?

Are they really making it about themselves? A majority of the videos I've seen are just people mentioning whom they were nominated by and then who they are challenging then a dump of some fashion.
 
Disagreeing with someone's opinions is one thing, but saying their opinion is stupid, illogical and harmful sucks more.

Unless it's true. Your reasoning is terrible and yet you persist in decrying a campaign responsible for raising millions upons millions of dollars for a worthy cause. Why? If this went away tomorrow what do you perceive the benefit to the world would be?
 
Obviously not everybody is going to donate but if at least a higher percentage of the total people who are seeing and doing these videos decide to donate then something good is happening.
 
Unless it's true. Your reasoning is terrible and yet you persist in decrying a campaign responsible for raising millions upons millions of dollars for a worthy cause. Why? If this went away tomorrow what do you perceive the benefit to the world would be?

I literally only said that I think most people are doing it for the wrong reasons, which has led to the meaning behind the challenge being diluted, and that I personally wouldn't partake in it. I'm not decrying it for raising funds and awareness for a terrible disease -- it's obviously been effective. It's just that in my opinion, some people are taking advantage of it for their own benefit.

Please stop projecting your own opinions onto me.
 
I literally only said that I think most people are doing it for the wrong reasons, which has led to the meaning behind the challenge being diluted, and that I personally wouldn't partake in it. I'm not decrying it for raising funds and awareness for a terrible disease -- it's obviously been effective. It's just that in my opinion, some people are taking advantage of it for their own benefit.

Please stop projecting your own opinions onto me.
Why does it matter to you if people want to be attention whores?

If it's not this, they'll find some other way. In the end, this at least raises (a lot of) money for a good cause.
 
Why does it matter to you if people want to be attention whores?

If it's not this, they'll find some other way. In the end, this at least raises (a lot of) money for a good cause.

Because I don't think it's right for people to take advantage of a charitable cause for their own benefit, even if it does benefit the charity in a nominal way.
 
Why does it matter to you if people want to be attention whores?

If it's not this, they'll find some other way. In the end, this at least raises (a lot of) money for a good cause.

"why does it matter" is the least substantial criticism (of criticism) possible. Why do people care about things you don't? Why are people bothered by things? That's not even trying to have a discussion.
 
I literally only said that I think most people are doing it for the wrong reasons, which has led to the meaning behind the challenge being diluted, and that I personally wouldn't partake in it. I'm not decrying it for raising funds and awareness for a terrible disease -- it's obviously been effective. It's just that in my opinion, some people are taking advantage of it for their own benefit.

Please stop projecting your own opinions onto me.

"The meaning behind the challenge being diluted." Even granting you the truth of this for the sake of discussion, please explain to me what practical effect this has on reality. Is the money they collect worth less? Is the awareness raised somehow bad?

Before this happened there was less money raised for ALS and less people that knew about the disease and the efforts to fight it. Your criticisms don't attempt to nullify these benefits and don't even attempt to suggest they would improve if the message were somehow not diluted, whatever that means.
 
Because I don't think it's right for people to take advantage of a charitable cause for their own benefit, even if it does benefit the charity in a nominal way.
Is $15.6 million nominal? In the same period last year, the foundation raised $1.8 million.

Yeah, really "nominal."

All people have done is put videos of themselves on the Internet. A guy with ALS started the whole thing. The only reason to actually have a problem with it is simply to be obstinate.
"why does it matter" is the least substantial criticism (of criticism) possible. Why do people care about things you don't? Why are people bothered by things? That's not even trying to have a discussion.
"Why does it matter?" and "Why does it matter if...?" are completely different questions. I qualified my question with pertinent information, which the person to whom I was speaking made a logical response from his perspective.

You are the one who doesn't understand discussion. Until you do understand, please refrain from addressing me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom