It's supposed to be fun/funny.
What does more good - me donating $100 or tagging a bunch of people and getting them to donate and/or tag a bunch more people to do the same thing?
I did it and donated money.
Don't want to share video but wanted to say a lot of money has been raised before the cynics come out.
People who are cynical about this, are just that... cynical.
Am I allowed to be cynical about how absolutely dumbed down its become as it spreads?
It went from getting attention about a disease and a charity, and how to contribute. To seeing dozens and dozens of posts that don't even mention ALS, just videos of people doing reverse dunk tanks for fun. And that is definitely a problem.
I personally have not and wouldn't even if I was challenged. Most of the people who I've seen do it are approaching it as a chain letter. One girl (an ex-girlfriend actually) said something like, "Thanks, Kelly, you bitch, for nominating me for this," and then proceeded to dump water on her head without mentioning the cause or anything. Like every other viral charity awareness campaign, it's been diluted to the point where it doesn't mean anything.
Not if it keeps raising money. How much awareness was being raised before this started? The logic being employed here stinks.
This seems like a big distraction, who started this anyway?
Got challenged multiple times.
Ignored it.
Donated nothing.
Furthermore, ignored the reminders with links to absurdly-outdated memes that are more irritating than clever or witty. All your base, all the time.
Am I allowed to be cynical about how absolutely dumbed down its become as it spreads?
It went from getting attention about a disease and a charity, and how to contribute. To seeing dozens and dozens of posts that don't even mention ALS, just videos of people doing reverse dunk tanks for fun. And that is definitely a problem.
Except for the $15+ million raised to fight the disease so far. So yeah, pretty much nothing.
Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, but it's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.
What about the people who don't actually donate as part of the challenge? They're taking advantage of a charity for their own celebrity.
Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, but it's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.
What about the people who don't actually donate as part of the challenge? They're taking advantage of a charity for their own celebrity.
Yeah, this big damn distraction gave the foundation millions more than before. What worthless waste of time, am I right?[/B]
That's the thing though... who cares? Certainly the ones who are helped by the amount of money they're getting, do not. The self-perception of people, their egos and whatnot is really the least interesting or important thing here. Everyyone should treat that side of the whole issue as what it is, trivial.Yes, it's raised money and awareness of the disease which is great, butit's happening for the wrong reasons. People want to get recognition for the fact that they're donating to a cause instead of just donating to that cause without any recognition or reward for their charity.
This article on the topic is good -- http://m.vice.com/read/dumping-a-bucket-of-ice-on-your-head-does-not-make-you-a-philanthropist-813
More money for any cause is good -- but people dumping water instead of donating is not.
It started in Boston.Done it and donated. Must have started here in the Northeast because my FB has been flooded with them for weeks now.
Put a funnel down my shorts and brought the pain.
It started in Boston.
This might be the most accurate use of this image I've ever seen. Some people in here are actually grumpy about a trend that has raised millions of dollars for a good cause just because people are having fun while doing it. That's pathetic.No-fun-allowed..jpg
Got challenged and donated 50$. I posted a screen shot of the email confirmation when I donated instead of dumping ice water on my head. Raising awareness is good and all, but if you're going to accept the challenge then you should donate something. Posting a video dumping water over your head doesn't prove you donated anything and I'll assume you did it just for fb likes.
You should calm down a bit. I never said it was a waste of time, I simply speculated that it seems like a distraction. Sorry that you are offended by a bit of skepticism. All the sarcasm will make it better, am I right?
Why not just donate money instead of folks making this about themselves?
Why not just donate money instead of folks making this about themselves?
Why not just donate money instead of folks making this about themselves?
This is concern trolling at its worst. Cynicism sucks but stupid, illogical, harmful cynicism sucks more.
Disagreeing with someone's opinions is one thing, but saying their opinion is stupid, illogical and harmful sucks more.
Because the point is to maximize the effect and raise awareness as well. It's obviously working.
A guy with ALS started it.I guess this makes sense but I'm pretty cynical and it just seems weird to see all the fun n games around ALS
I guess this makes sense but I'm pretty cynical and it just seems weird to see all the fun n games around ALS
Unless it's true. Your reasoning is terrible and yet you persist in decrying a campaign responsible for raising millions upons millions of dollars for a worthy cause. Why? If this went away tomorrow what do you perceive the benefit to the world would be?
Why does it matter to you if people want to be attention whores?I literally only said that I think most people are doing it for the wrong reasons, which has led to the meaning behind the challenge being diluted, and that I personally wouldn't partake in it. I'm not decrying it for raising funds and awareness for a terrible disease -- it's obviously been effective. It's just that in my opinion, some people are taking advantage of it for their own benefit.
Please stop projecting your own opinions onto me.
Why does it matter to you if people want to be attention whores?
If it's not this, they'll find some other way. In the end, this at least raises (a lot of) money for a good cause.
Why does it matter to you if people want to be attention whores?
If it's not this, they'll find some other way. In the end, this at least raises (a lot of) money for a good cause.
I literally only said that I think most people are doing it for the wrong reasons, which has led to the meaning behind the challenge being diluted, and that I personally wouldn't partake in it. I'm not decrying it for raising funds and awareness for a terrible disease -- it's obviously been effective. It's just that in my opinion, some people are taking advantage of it for their own benefit.
Please stop projecting your own opinions onto me.
Is $15.6 million nominal? In the same period last year, the foundation raised $1.8 million.Because I don't think it's right for people to take advantage of a charitable cause for their own benefit, even if it does benefit the charity in a nominal way.
"Why does it matter?" and "Why does it matter if...?" are completely different questions. I qualified my question with pertinent information, which the person to whom I was speaking made a logical response from his perspective."why does it matter" is the least substantial criticism (of criticism) possible. Why do people care about things you don't? Why are people bothered by things? That's not even trying to have a discussion.