He had on slippers, SLIPPERS.
Rushing the cop is such a ridiculous story.
Right. I find him tripping on his slippers more believable than him charging a cop who is shooting at him.
He had on slippers, SLIPPERS.
Rushing the cop is such a ridiculous story.
Oh, sorry, I should have clarified. I ask just for the sake of knowing how close they are in design because it would seem dumb to me to design them to look / feel like a gun. The "defense" of "I thought it was my tazer" is ludicrous to me regardless.Lets say that they have a thing called weapons training in the Police department. Now, lets ask that question again. Could a trained police officer mistake a tazer with a gun? An officer trained to be familiar with the weight/feel/use of the device.
Could that person, in the heat of... OH WAIT, he was handcuffed on the ground already. Well, could a person trained to use pistols and tasers, on top of another handcuffed on the ground, confuse a taser for a gun. Aim it, probably take a safety off, and shoot a person to death?
In theory, people advocating withholding judgment wouldn't necessarily also be racist and/or with a pro-police bias. However, the majority of posters who've said this in this thread have been abrasive, seemingly only use that argument against people who are making conclusions based on what is already known that paint officer Wilson in a bad light (and who acknowledge the very quantifiable trend in situations like these throughout American history), and those same people saying "you can't pass judgment" have frequently done just that with their own speculation.
The other side is not doing the same thing. We think Wilson murdered a surrending Brown because of the evidence and multiple unrelated witness testimony. You believe Wilson defended himself from an attacking Brown because of the testimony of a few of his friends and your admitted bias towards authority.
Hate to say it..but I dont think this cop will be charged/convicted of any crime.
The autopsy mixed with massive character damage from thr robbery video will be more then enough to sway a jury/judge.
The video was enough for me to think this...the autopsy showing no real execution style killing sealed the deal.
He had on slippers, SLIPPERS.
Rushing the cop is such a ridiculous story.
ah the good ol too much attention on race, yet many whites claim to not see race?
Right. I find him tripping on his slippers more believable than him charging a cop who is shooting at him.
So how did he run away?
Hate to say it..but I dont think this cop will be charged/convicted of any crime.
The autopsy mixed with massive character damage from thr robbery video will be more then enough to sway a jury/judge.
The video was enough for me to think this...the autopsy showing no real execution style killing sealed the deal.
I don't see anyone suggesting this in the thread at all. Everyone acknowledges that he at least resisted and ran away. Everyone would also acknowledge that he put his hands up in response to being shot at rather than his saintly disposition. I guess the truth will always lie in the middle if you misconstrue both sides.
The fact that he hasn't been charged yet is disheartening.
This is a problem with a lot of media sources actually. I can't actually think of a single instance as of yet where one of them has pointed out how the shoplifitng video and story do nothing other than assassinate character unless it was the statement coming from the family.This is why I hate CNN. Not everything us a 50/50 issue. There are 4 (?) Witnesses with the same story and they're pretending like it's still in the air whether or not Brown rushed at him.
So how did he run away?
people who complain about the protestors need to realize that if the people did not mobilize, Michael Brown would have been just another victim of police shooting swept under the rug.
I believe there is a grand jury hearing happening soon.
The guy who was tazed by police and then shot before he hit the ground was also said to be charging.
You believe he did something to warrant being shot while surrendering.
What evidence? The only thing we have is testimony and an autopsy unless I missed something.
Where did this "rushing the cop" thing even start? I know it happen after the autopsy showed that wound on his head but who actually started that theory?Was it Fox News?
I believe MSNBC said Wednesday?
Does an autopsy not count as evidence? Maybe I used the wrong word, in any case I belive the autopsy supports the claim that Brown was shot while surrenduring.
That's probably what I'm going to end up doing, but you just raised a very good point and something I hope the prosecution uses if this goes to trail.It is very hard. I rarely fire guns, but I would recommend doing so at a range just for experience's sake. Your accuracy drops very sharply if you're aiming for something specific. That's why I was very confused as to how the officer shot Brown in the eye. That requires extreme marksmanship. But it seems that wound started at the top of the head and went down, etc.
Also, a gun is a killing weapon, and as such should be an absolute last resort use item. Using it for the purpose of anything else is asking for trouble. Use something else.
Aiming a gun, especially a pistol, is dramatically harder than you're imagining. It's hard.
I get what you mean, but a gun is designed to kill. A shot to a foot isn't a "wounding shot," it's just less likely to be lethal than a shot to center mass, or the head.
Where did this "rushing the cop" thing even start? I know it happen after the autopsy showed that wound on his head but who actually started that theory?Was it Fox News?
None of that matters though, because you don't shoot someone who is running away. You pursue. It doesn't matter how "saintly" Brown was or not.
I wonder what the arguments for the cop would be if Brown had been shot in the back of the head and died that way.
From what I can tell it seems to come from Wilson's side of the story, having be told to press by his friend because he's still too much of a coward to show his face.Where did this "rushing the cop" thing even start? I know it happen after the autopsy showed that wound on his head but who actually started that theory?Was it Fox News?
eh, both sides of the story seemed too sensationalized to me. I have not been following the story as closely as other, so I apologize if some of this has already been debunked or explained.
I don't believe that the officer just brutality murdered good-boy mike brown who was standing peacefully with his hands in the air. That just doesn't make sense.
I also don't believe that Brown rushed the officer in some drug induced state and ran threw a storm of bullets until he was fine hit in the hit. This isn't a damn zombie movie.
Has to be somewhere in the middle where the officer approached Brown. Maybe he panicked knowing he just committed a theft so he does something rash like punching the officer in the face, slamming the his door back on him as he's trying to exit or threaten him in some other way. As he is trying to flee the scene the enraged officer fires off at Brown like a dumbass. And Probably meaning to inflict some serious damage which is present by the bullet wound to the head.
Because I default to authority.
So you're one of those obedient, mindless, soulless conformists who like the thinking to be done for you. Thank you for pointing that out so I know that zero critical thinking has been put into any of your posts and that they should be summarily ignored.
People like you are disgusting, abhorrent excuses of human beings. You have no compassion, no rationality, no concept of what it means to be decent. Unfortunately your type pollutes the discussion with passive aggressive mentions of implausible alternatives that seek to discredit the reputation of dead 18 year-old.
Stay classy, stay ignorant, and above all please stay away from the keyboard. The world will be a better place without your input.
this whole situation will probably be something of past problems ten years from now when people likely will have wearable tech like google glass on. seeing events from Browns and Wilson's perspectives from video recording devices would be such a good way to make these incidents cut and dry.
this whole situation will probably be something of past problems ten years from now when people likely will have wearable tech like google glass on. seeing events from Browns and Wilson's perspectives from video recording devices would be such a good way to make these incidents cut and dry.
So you're one of those obedient, mindless, soulless conformists who like the thinking to be done for you. Thank you for pointing that out so I know that zero critical thinking has been put into any of your posts and that they should be summarily ignored.
People like you are disgusting, abhorrent excuses of human beings. You have no compassion, no rationality, no concept of what it means to be decent. Unfortunately your type pollutes the discussion with passive aggressive mentions of implausible alternatives that seek to discredit the reputation of dead 18 year-old.
Stay classy, stay ignorant, and above all please stay away from the keyboard. The world will be a better place without your input.
Yeah, this makes sense the more I think about it. I'd like to be a badass that can make those sort of shots tho, if I were absolutely forced to ever using a gun.
So you're one of those obedient, mindless, soulless conformists who like the thinking to be done for you. Thank you for pointing that out so I know that zero critical thinking has been put into any of your posts and that they should be summarily ignored.
People like you are disgusting, abhorrent excuses of human beings. You have no compassion, no rationality, no concept of what it means to be decent. Unfortunately your type pollutes the discussion with passive aggressive mentions of implausible alternatives that seek to discredit the reputation of dead 18 year-old.
Stay classy, stay ignorant, and above all please stay away from the keyboard. The world will be a better place without your input.
Here is another main problem with the story that Wilson was getting hit. If he was being pummeled that bad, why is there no mention of bruising on mikes arms or hands.
No. How could you possibly come to that conclusion? The poster, in capital letters, was insinuating that it was not likely that he was charging the officer because of slippers. I replied how did he run away? Did he take his slippers off?
Has to be somewhere in the middle
Wow, were you captain of your debate team.So you're one of those obedient, mindless, soulless conformists who like the thinking to be done for you. Thank you for pointing that out so I know that zero critical thinking has been put into any of your posts and that they should be summarily ignored.
People like you are disgusting, abhorrent excuses of human beings. You have no compassion, no rationality, no concept of what it means to be decent. Unfortunately your type pollutes the discussion with passive aggressive mentions of implausible alternatives that seek to discredit the reputation of dead 18 year-old.
Stay classy, stay ignorant, and above all please stay away from the keyboard. The world will be a better place without your input.
So you're one of those obedient, mindless, soulless conformists who like the thinking to be done for you. Thank you for pointing that out so I know that zero critical thinking has been put into any of your posts and that they should be summarily ignored.
People like you are disgusting, abhorrent excuses of human beings. You have no compassion, no rationality, no concept of what it means to be decent. Unfortunately your type pollutes the discussion with passive aggressive mentions of implausible alternatives that seek to discredit the reputation of dead 18 year-old.
Stay classy, stay ignorant, and above all please stay away from the keyboard. The world will be a better place without your input.
WHOA.
I apologize if this was already posted:
![]()
This is unnecessary.
I'm going to assume you're relatively young here.
The expertise and marksmanship you'd require to make those kind of shots takes years upon years of practice/training. And a lot of it does not apply to real life situations, but competitions/tournaments.
This was highly unnecessary.
The only thing I can think of is Wilson tripping and hitting his face, or Brown slamming the car door back in his face. If there's no bruising on the hands, he definitely didn't hit him.
The only thing I can think of is Wilson tripping and hitting his face, or Brown slamming the car door back in his face. If there's no bruising on the hands, he definitely didn't hit him.