I really don't like focusing on the details on the robbery. However, I do like it when everyone is on the same page as it pertains to what is and isn't known. Does him stealing cigars make me think that he was a dangerous criminal that would charge a police officer? No. But I am confused about why there is doubt as to whether or not it happened.
As I understood it, there seems to be a bit of confusion out there in terms of what happened prior to the footage of him shoving the clerk out of the way. I thought I read at one point that he either did pay for or attempted to pay for a pack of cigars (or cigarillos), and ended up taking a box. Regardless of whether a customer called the police or the people working at the shop, a police report was filed to the effect of a box of Swisher Sweets being stolen. That was released in the information packet Chief Wiggum put out there when he decided that the situation wasn't incendiary enough on Friday.
Also, Johnson's lawyer admitted that cigars were taken:
Again, I post this not to further a "he was a thief and ruffian and I bet he instigated something with the cop" narrative. I'm just confused as to how we got to quibbling over whether or not he even stole cigars, because I thought it was largely agreed that this was true but irrelevant given that Wilson didn't confront him (at least initially, probably not even at all) as a result of that theft.