Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
The autopsy confirmed he was shot once in the front, and that there was an exit wound from the top of his skull with the shot to the head. Or has this information been changed?

The police were called by a witness in the store, so the fact that the shop owner/clerk did not call the police is irrelevant as they'd already been notified.

Darren Wilson had no knowledge of any of those events, prior to gunning Brown down.
 
If you were a shop owner in that current hostile town, would you want to incite the angry mob by looking like you're helping the police?

EDIT:...BTW a customer called it in

The robbery happened way before there was even a thought of protest. Would someone wait that long to report a robbery?
 
Having worked at a gas station, you don't really have the time or care to report a theft of less than a few dollars.

Unless they stole from a customer, that is.

But again, stealing some cigars is not reason to be shot at, ever.

I think that's the whole point, so that this theft (that we are unsure of even happened or qualifies as one) isn't used to justify murder.
 
Is this top comment true or not about how many shots? The top comment says they just released a statement saying 3 of the bullet wounds came from 1 bullet.

There were multiple wounds but two independant autopsies have determined that he was shot at least 6 times but perhaps as many as 8 times.

It's hard to tell exactly how many wounds were caused by initial shots because he was shot too many times.
 
Whether or not he stole the cigarillos, you have video evidence of him assaulting the store owner.

No, I don't think that means he should have been shot.
 
The autopsy confirmed he was shot once in the front, and that there was an exit wound from the top of his skull with the shot to the head. Or has this information been changed?

That was never what was confirmed. The entry wound was into the top of the skull, and the pathologists suggested this was most likely due to him falling. All of the shots but one definitely were into the front of his body, and the remaining one could have been from behind depending on the position of his arm.
 
I don't believe the officer will be sentenced to jail. His friend was there with him when the robbery happened so any testimony will be suspect. Eyewitnesses have also given conflicting reports. And it's not like the judicial system will allow him to be convicted by a community that is protesting and rioting on the streets. The trial will be held in some middle class area with a white majority. At that point the drug angle and all other things will play a significant role.
 
Darren Wilson had no knowledge of any of those events, prior to gunning Brown down.
Where did I say he did? Where did I say that even if Wilson HAD known that Brown was a robbery/theft suspect that it should make a lick of a difference?

What does that have to do with the fact that you're making objectively false statements?
 
I think that's the whole point, so that this theft (that we are unsure of even happened or qualifies as one) isn't used to justify murder.

First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.
 
These statements came out a couple of days ago. Way past the start of the protest, and the looting.

You suggested that he wouldn't call the police because he would be worried he would be targeted but I doubt he would have waited days to report a robbery. Even if he was afraid of when things first started kicking off it would have been an hour or 2.
 
The autopsy confirmed he was shot once in the front, and that there was an exit wound from the top of his skull with the shot to the head. Or has this information been changed?



Darren Wilson had no knowledge of any of those events, prior to gunning Brown down.

The family's autopsy said there were 4 shots to the arm, and 2 to the head. All were fired from the front, although there is a possibility one to the arm could have come from behind.

The shot to the head was was not an exit wound. Both entered the head while the head was down, the second one entering the eye and exiting through the jaw hitting the collar bone. The examiner thought he could have been falling.
 
Where did I say he did? Where did I say that even if Wilson HAD known that Brown was a robbery/theft suspect that it would make a lick of a difference?

Everything dealing with the shop/store owner/cigars has no relevance on anything dealing with his murder. That's what I'm saying.

The family's autopsy said there were 4 shots to the arm, and 2 to the head. All were fired from the front, although there is a possibility one to the arm could have come from behind.

The shot to the was was not an exit wound. Both entered the head while the head was down, the second one entering the eye and exiting through the jaw hitting the collar bone. The examiner thought he could have been falling.


Thanks.
 
I don't believe the officer will be sentenced to jail. His friend was there with him when the robbery happened so any testimony will be suspect. Eyewitnesses have also given conflicting reports. And it's not like the judicial system will allow him to be convicted by a community that is protesting and rioting on the streets. The trial will be held in some middle class area with a white majority. At that point the drug angle and all other things will play a significant role.

Unless significant evidence is produced to support the officer's story I would not bet on this.
 
The autopsy confirmed he was shot once in the front, and that there was an exit wound from the top of his skull with the shot to the head. Or has this information been changed?

The press conference of the family's autopsy clearly said that all the shots were from the front. The shot on the arm is in question, it could have been from the front or back, etc.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klGJE-_ydeY

What's your source for 6 times in the back?
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.

Why would the cop have to die? Why the fuck are you assuming that this kid wanted to kill the cop?

You still haven't answered that question. If your answer is 'Because he shoplifted cigars' then that's not good enough. Lots of people shoplift everyday without then trying to kill a cop.
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.

What the fuck.

Better the murderer live than the guy who stole a $3 pack of cigars.
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.

Because the cop isn't trained nor have the tools for non-lethal force, right?
 
The family's autopsy said there were 4 shots to the arm, and 2 to the head. All were fired from the front, although there is a possibility one to the arm could have come from behind.

The shot to the head was was not an exit wound. Both entered the head while the head was down, the second one entering the eye and exiting through the jaw hitting the collar bone. The examiner thought he could have been falling.
The autopsy report said the shot to the top of the head exited through the supraorbital ridge (eye).

Where did you read the shot went in the eye and out the jaw?
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.

better him than the cop.

I'm trying so hard to understand this. Attacking a cop isn't a death sentence.
 
Everything dealing with the shop/store owner/cigars has no relevance on anything dealing with his murder. That's what I'm saying.




Thanks.

This is the most important thing to remember, im pretty sure it was the police chief even stated this in an interview.
 
The autopsy confirmed he was shot once in the front, and that there was an exit wound from the top of his skull with the shot to the head. Or has this information been changed?



Darren Wilson had no knowledge of any of those events, prior to gunning Brown down.

You are 100% wrong with just about everything you posted. At least come back to someone posting crazy things with a modicum of facts

The robbery isn't relevant, but don't say it never happened
 
I really don't like focusing on the details on the robbery. However, I do like it when everyone is on the same page as it pertains to what is and isn't known. Does him stealing cigars make me think that he was a dangerous criminal that would charge a police officer? No. But I am confused about why there is doubt as to whether or not it happened.

As I understood it, there seems to be a bit of confusion out there in terms of what happened prior to the footage of him shoving the clerk out of the way. I thought I read at one point that he either did pay for or attempted to pay for a pack of cigars (or cigarillos), and ended up taking a box. Regardless of whether a customer called the police or the people working at the shop, a police report was filed to the effect of a box of Swisher Sweets being stolen. That was released in the information packet Chief Wiggum put out there when he decided that the situation wasn't incendiary enough on Friday.

Also, Johnson's lawyer admitted that cigars were taken:

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ferguson-police-name-michael-brown said:
In an interview with msnbc shortly after the report was released, Johnson’s lawyer confirmed that Brown had taken cigars from the store.

“We see that there’s tape, that they claim they got a tape that shows there was some sort of strong-armed robbery,” said Freeman Bosley, Johnson’s attorney. “We need to see that tape, my client did tell us and told the FBI that they went into the store. He told FBI that [Brown] did take cigarillos. He told that to the DOJ and the St. Louis County Police.”

Again, I post this not to further a "he was a thief and ruffian and I bet he instigated something with the cop" narrative. I'm just confused as to how we got to quibbling over whether or not he even stole cigars, because I thought it was largely agreed that this was true but irrelevant given that Wilson didn't confront him (at least initially, probably not even at all) as a result of that theft.
 
I don't believe the officer will be sentenced to jail. His friend was there with him when the robbery happened so any testimony will be suspect. Eyewitnesses have also given conflicting reports. And it's not like the judicial system will allow him to be convicted by a community that is protesting and rioting on the streets. The trial will be held in some middle class area with a white majority. At that point the drug angle and all other things will play a significant role.

And you can bet any black jurors will be struck for "reasons."
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.

Yyyyyyyyyyyikes

What a post to wake up to.
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.
Did you know that in other developed countries, it's possible for police officers to defend themselves without having to pull out a gun and empty half a clip into someone that was, by many eye witness accounts, surrendering?
 
Everything dealing with the shop/store owner/cigars has no relevance on anything dealing with his murder. That's what I'm saying.
And most sane people agree with that. But that doesn't mean that what you said here:
He didn't steal anything, actually. Please stop spreading lies and misinformation. He paid for his cigars, and no chargers or calls were ever made about any theft from that store.
is not also factually incorrect. Arguing that he didn't allegedly commit a crime only detracts from the important issues to be discussed.
 
First I want to make it clear that I don't think he deserved to die for stealing from the store and roughing up the owner, but if it's found out he was attacking the cop in any way then It's unfortunate he had to die, but better him than the cop.

Why is it better that he's dead instead of the cop?
 
Was he shot in the back? Last I was reading this topic, they were saying the autopsy reports were indicating he was shot in the front.

One of the guys who helped perform the autopsy said that the shot to his arm could've happened as he was running away, with his back turn. But as far as I know, all other shots were to his front. Which would be consistent with the eyewitnesses.

The dude was a giant that pushed the shop owner like he was nothing,



Better the robber than a cop with a great record.

It needs to be said that the chief would not know if Wilson had a clean record because the reports of excessive force and disciplinary action are not kept in his personnel file in the Ferguson police department, they are put in the individual case files he was involved in. It is possible he had a clean record before he killed Brown (though we wouldn't know it to be certain). It's probably also worth noting that Brown also had a clean record before he robbed a store.
 
You are 100% wrong with just about everything you posted. At least come back to someone posting crazy things with a modicum of facts

The robbery isn't relevant, but don't say it never happened

Like most things about this case, there is alot of incorrect information being passed around. Thanks to people like Youngblood for taking a second to actually post correct information on it.

Doesn't change the fact it has no bearing on the slaying of Brown. But I know you just wanted to say something smart and snazzy.

I really don't like focusing on the details on the robbery. However, I do like it when everyone is on the same page as it pertains to what is and isn't known. Does him stealing cigars make me think that he was a dangerous criminal that would charge a police officer? No. But I am confused about why there is doubt as to whether or not it happened.

As I understood it, there seems to be a bit of confusion out there in terms of what happened prior to the footage of him shoving the clerk out of the way. I thought I read at one point that he either did pay for or attempted to pay for a pack of cigars (or cigarillos), and ended up taking a box. Regardless of whether a customer called the police or the people working at the shop, a police report was filed to the effect of a box of Swisher Sweets being stolen. That was released in the information packet Chief Wiggum put out there when he decided that the situation wasn't incendiary enough on Friday.

Also, Johnson's lawyer admitted that cigars were taken:



Again, I post this not to further a "he was a thief and ruffian and I bet he instigated something with the cop" narrative. I'm just confused as to how we got to quibbling over whether or not he even stole cigars, because I thought it was largely agreed that this was true but irrelevant given that Wilson didn't confront him (at least initially, probably not even at all) as a result of that theft.

Thanks for that, sir.
 
The autopsy report said the shot to the top of the head exited through the supraorbital ridge (eye).

Where did you read the shot went in the eye and out the jaw?

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/1...was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0&referrer=

One of the bullets shattered Mr. Brown’s right eye, traveled through his face, exited his jaw and re-entered his collarbone. The last two shots in the head would have stopped him in his tracks and were likely the last fired.
 
Everything dealing with the shop/store owner/cigars has no relevance on anything dealing with his murder. That's what I'm saying.

For the most part that's true, but the robbery would play into Brown's demeanor in his confrontation with Wilson. Even though Wilson didn't know about the robbery, I'd expect Brown to think he did, and for him to treat the situation differently because of it.

Yet again, I'm in no way justifying what happened, but it does does have some relevance to the confrontation.
 
I don't know that dog piling on that comment is fair. "Better him than the cop" refers to being killed, which means IF his life were truly in danger he prefers the attacker be dead instead of the victim. He even said if. So I don't know that that's a controversial desire in any case.
 
And most sane people agree with that. But that doesn't mean that what you said here:

is not also factually incorrect. Arguing that he didn't allegedly commit a crime only detracts from the important issues to be discussed.

There has literally been a page of corrections to varying degrees on that already. I'm catching up. But thanks for that my good friend!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom