yankeehater
Member
Foles 10000 yards 72 tds -8 ints
FUCK YEAH!!!
![]()
![]()
I'M PUMPED UP EVEN MORE NOW.
Saw a guy wearing a browns shirt walking around campus, he looked so sad
We didn't go back in time. This is a passing league. Your numbers are low across the board save for Rodgers 42 TDs which he won't get near. Plus receivers can't even be touched now with them enforcing the illegal contact rule. This year is gonna be crazy.
Grostradamus
Cutler: 3600 YDS/ 29 TD/ 19 INT -13 GP
Newton: 3450 YDS/ 22 TD/ 11 INT - 16 GP
StaffGawd: 4000 YDS/ 37 TD/ 21 INT - 16 GP
Rodgers: 4200 YDS/ 42 TD/ 7 INT - 16 GP
Manning (P): 4500 YDS/ 43 TD/ 14 INT - 15 GP
Brady : 3800 YDS / 30 TD/ 9 INT - 16 GP
Brees : 4900 YDS/ 36 TD/ 13 INT - 15 GP
Foles : 3000 YDS/ 26 TD/ 12 INT - 16 GP
None of these are outlandish, although the fact you had to clarify which Manning did crack me up. As if Eli would ever put up a season close to that.
I would hope Foles would have more yards and tds since he only played 10 games Las year.Wilson, Luck, Smith, Kaep, Hoyer/Manziel, Ryan coming next
Cutler- If you scale my numbers out to a full season, you actually get 4430/35 which is right around what you said he was going to get. There's absolutely no way he stays healthy for 16 games though. I'm not even confident about him playing 13.
Cam- I thought "the Panthers have no receivers!" was all the rage these days. Plus you add in the fact that he's already injured playing behind an unproven o-line and I can't really justify projecting a huge stat increase for him. These numbers are right around where he was last year. Yards are a tick up, picks and TD's slightly down.
Stafford- Staff's the wildcard because he's fully capable of a 5000/45/15 type season, especially with the wide receivers he's got like Megatron and Eric Ebron. But that depends on Staff not fucking up like he's prone to do. I'm banking on more than a few slips from him and stayed conservative with my projections.
Rodgers- The complete opposite of Stafford. I shouldn't trust someone coming off of a major injury nearly as much as I do with Rodgers, but he's been so reliable in the past. I went aggressive and plotted him to be right in line with his 2011/2012 numbers.
Manning- Big drop-offs across the board from last year just for two reasons.
A) Last year was historically great and its hard to say that its repeatable.
B) Manning's Age
Still a phenomenal year though
Brady- Almost right in line with where he was last year with similar type weapons. Drop in yards, but better TD/INT ratio. If Gronk ever gets back to where he was, that could throw this projection on its head.
Brees- If you scale for an additional game (predicting he sits out the final game of the season), its right in line with his stats the past few years. Perhaps with Cooks in the fold, you could see a tick up. On the other hand, losing Sproles will hurt their O a bit.
Foles- Like I said earlier, his stats from last year aren't repeatable. He's throwing more than 2 picks. Losing DJax is a huge blow. But it still won't be a bad year by any means. Yards will go slightly up, touchdowns will be the same, picks will go way up.
RG3- He will tear his Achilles in Week 9 and miss the rest of the year. Sorry.
Tanny is the next Foles only better don't worry.I hope that Ryan Tannehill has an excellent year quarterbacking his NFL team, the Miami Dolphins.
My mental stability may depend on it. I never claimed to be a smart man.
You forgot about Ben and Flacco.Grostradamus
Cutler: 3600 YDS/ 29 TD/ 19 INT -13 GP
Newton: 3450 YDS/ 22 TD/ 11 INT - 16 GP
StaffGawd: 4000 YDS/ 37 TD/ 21 INT - 16 GP
Rodgers: 4200 YDS/ 42 TD/ 7 INT - 16 GP
Manning (P): 4500 YDS/ 43 TD/ 14 INT - 15 GP
Brady : 3800 YDS / 30 TD/ 9 INT - 16 GP
Brees : 4900 YDS/ 36 TD/ 13 INT - 15 GP
Foles : 3000 YDS/ 26 TD/ 12 INT - 16 GP
I know the season kickoff starts in under 23 hours but I think we can lay off the drugs for just a little bit longer until then, friends
No thank youI hope that Ryan Tannehill has an excellent year quarterbacking his NFL team, the Miami Dolphins.
My mental stability may depend on it. I never claimed to be a smart man.
I see a lot of Browns shirts on campus. They all look sad.
I hope that Ryan Tannehill has an excellent year quarterbacking his NFL team, the Miami Dolphins.
My mental stability may depend on it. I never claimed to be a smart man.
He could if he got to play the Pats 16 times.
:jncImagine we win this Sunday....I might not watch another game this season
Also one of Brady or Peyton is going to get old this year. Possibly both.
I am hoping to see a Schoob season for Brady in particular. I might skip watching a Steelers game if Brady is putting up Schoob numbers.
While he played incredibly well in the two SB wins for the Giants, his numbers weren't crazy, just really efficient.
Get out you whoreHe played with heart. TWO TIME SUPERBOWL MVP ELI MANNING.
Miss the playoffs.Tony Romo- 7600 YDs/ 49 TD/ 1 INT - 16 GP
Matt Ryan- 4600 YDs/ 29 TD/ 14 INT - 16 GP
Ryan Tannehill- 4000 YDs/ 30 TD/ 17 INT - 16 GP
Congrats Tanny, you will hit the 4000 yard mark!
Eli Manning- 3800 YDs/ 23 TD/ 17 INT- 16 GP
Tony Romo- 4200 YDs/ 28 TD/ 12 INT- 15 GP
All red blooded Americans will be celebrating with me. Only Pats fans and Al Queda will be saddened by it.Here's Bionic getting ready to start watching some football if Brady starts sucking that badly:
![]()
Football is a team game. Ask tommy or peypey.Miss the playoffs.
All red blooded Americans will be celebrating with me. Only Pats fans and Al Queda will be saddened by it.
You just received an invite to the Super Bowl party at my new house. It's all set up for surround. Just need a receiver and a gigantic fuck yeah American television. The 50" in my basement ain't going to cut it anymore....I'll drink myself into a Coma in celebration
All red blooded Americans will be celebrating with me. Only Pats fans and Al Queda will be saddened by it.
Wilson, Luck, Smith, Kaep, Hoyer/Manziel, Ryan coming next
Cutler- If you scale my numbers out to a full season, you actually get 4430/35 which is right around what you said he was going to get. There's absolutely no way he stays healthy for 16 games though. I'm not even confident about him playing 13.
Cam- I thought "the Panthers have no receivers!" was all the rage these days. Plus you add in the fact that he's already injured playing behind an unproven o-line and I can't really justify projecting a huge stat increase for him. These numbers are right around where he was last year. Yards are a tick up, picks and TD's slightly down.
Stafford- Staff's the wildcard because he's fully capable of a 5000/45/15 type season, especially with the wide receivers he's got like Megatron and Eric Ebron. But that depends on Staff not fucking up like he's prone to do. I'm banking on more than a few slips from him and stayed conservative with my projections.
Rodgers- The complete opposite of Stafford. I shouldn't trust someone coming off of a major injury nearly as much as I do with Rodgers, but he's been so reliable in the past. I went aggressive and plotted him to be right in line with his 2011/2012 numbers.
Manning- Big drop-offs across the board from last year just for two reasons.
A) Last year was historically great and its hard to say that its repeatable.
B) Manning's Age
Still a phenomenal year though
Brady- Almost right in line with where he was last year with similar type weapons. Drop in yards, but better TD/INT ratio. If Gronk ever gets back to where he was, that could throw this projection on its head.
Brees- If you scale for an additional game (predicting he sits out the final game of the season), its right in line with his stats the past few years. Perhaps with Cooks in the fold, you could see a tick up. On the other hand, losing Sproles will hurt their O a bit.
Foles- Like I said earlier, his stats from last year aren't repeatable. He's throwing more than 2 picks. Losing DJax is a huge blow. But it still won't be a bad year by any means. Yards will go slightly up, touchdowns will be the same, picks will go way up.
RG3- He will tear his Achilles in Week 9 and miss the rest of the year. Sorry.
All red blooded Americans will be celebrating with me. Only Pats fans and Al Queda will be saddened by it.
It's comforting to know that Heavy is wrong about everything.Grover, you know as well as anyone that Kelvin Benjamin is gonna have a huge year. 1100+ yards is all but guaranteed. He's going to be this year's Alshon Jeffery except less yardage since he doesn't have anyone else to take the heat like Jeffery has with Marshall. Expect around ~1100 for Benjamin, with 7 or 8 TDs.
You just received an invite to the Super Bowl party at my new house. It's all set up for surround. Just need a receiver and a gigantic fuck yeah American television. The 50" in my basement ain't going to cut it anymore....
It's comforting to know that Heavy is wrong about everything.
Benjamin was the lone bright-spot for the Panthers' first-team offense. Cam Newton looked his way first on seemingly every pass play, and Benjamin made Carolina's play of the night when he out-muscled Darrelle Revis on a quick slant in the second quarter.
According to the Associated Press, Cam Newton and first-round WR Kelvin Benjamin have been "practically inseparable."
Per reporter Steve Reed, the duo has "forged a close relationship on and off the field." Coach Ron Rivera calls their relationship a "big brother, little brother thing."
There is concern among some inside the Panthers that Kelvin Benjamin will face a "barrage" of double coverage this season.
The concern is that since Jerricho Cotchery, Greg Olsen and Jason Avant are slow-footed, teams can play them 1-on-1. Perhaps new practice squad addition Stephen Hill can eventually get on the active roster and stretch the field. Regardless, double coverage isn't a huge worry for us on Benjamin because he's going to be peppered with volume as Cam Newton's No. 1 target.
Bookmarked. I know more about bout this stuff than you do, that's the bottom line:
There's only one concern with Benjamin and that's the fact that he's going to get double-teamed up the wazoo:
Tony Romo- 7600 YDs/ 49 TD/ 1 INT - 16 GP
Falcons vs. Saints, one of the most underrated rivalries in sports:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/page...read-falcons-saints-rivalry-not-just-football
It's comforting to know that Heavy is wrong about everything.
NoWill the Jets win the Super Bowl?
Will the Jets win the Super Bowl?