Also, PS4 is a 400$ machine, dont expect the game to have graphics at highest possible settings just for being 30 fps.
There's so much wrong with your entire post I could write a dissertation about it. But let me focus on this sentence.
Just because
your favorite $400 console is an ill-conceived mess that's so wasteful with silicon it actually manages to be more expensive to produce than its 50%+ better performing counterpart, and runs an API that has no reason to exist on said console, doesn't mean said competition has the same constraints because the final price is the same.
Also, "settings". LOL.
Oh sorry, didn't read "no negativity allowed!".
So it is wrong to find out in a demo or to be curious which amount of detail the surrounding has in a game much praised for graphics?
Ah, the almighty post history card to officially and publically denounce people, that's all that was missing. You are a pro-user *thumbs up*.
Since when is there a clause on GAF's TOS that allows incessant trolling to masquarade as "criticism"? You can't get any worse than those pathetic excuses for your behavior...
Yes, a racer is designed around speed, sure. And water is wet.
If you are off to a ride through bushes, it's your inablilty or you want to try a shortcut. But the 3 second timer is to disallow for both. Not to say that you lose a lot of speed which doesn't keep the momentum constantly flowing.
Sure it is designed with the intention you wrote but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't share our opinion about it.
...
what
DriveClub. It's a
racer. The type of racer where you
race.
On tracks. I... Ugh.
Lose the persecution complex.
Honest question, why is this shit only going on in this DC thread and not in the FH2 demo thread? Surely all the trolling can't be this one sided?
Just posted in the thread that shall not be named. It's so nice there, guys. There's no concern posting, no trolling, no arguing...everyone is cool and happy.
Why can't we have this here, guys?
Guys pls.
People already said it - it's a mix of buyer's remorse and the compelling need to shake it off. Unfortunately The Order, GG's RPG, and Driveclub's suffer from its side effects. Uncharted 4 and Bloodborne have a lot of pedigree, so they are harder targets. Not that it stops everyone. "This game's never going to run at 60fps", "I bet it's still going to have lousy gunplay and autoplatforming", "Boo, they transformed Souls into DMC", "Why is everything so graaaaaay?"
Isn't the Crew garbage? That's probably why you aren't seeing it.
But PCars isn't, and you may see people saying PCars' graphics are close enough to DC's that its 60fps makes it the more impressive game, but never that it is outright plain superior...
Didnt look good at all if im being honest.
Will skip this and get Project Cars.
...or maybe sometimes people are just plain
blind.
Ill just say this. Both forza horzion and Driveclub look boring as shit to me.
But I don't jumping into threads comparing them to Need for speed rivals.
But dontcha know? NFSR's more impressive cause it's got helicopters and spike strips innit!
To be fair, people were finally getting their hands on FH2 yesterday with the demo. It's made a very positive impression, and it offers some unique elements we haven't seen in other racers.
Like what? Planes and trains? Such innovation. Much
fertile.
Leaving FH2 completely out of this, I think it's fair to say Driveclub is offering a very standard track based racing with great graphics. I don't think criticisms of that fact are unwarranted. It just comes off as a very uninspired product. It's main bullet point feature is that it's a "team based racing game", with challenges interweaved. In this day and age those sound like features you'd just expect to be in a game of this type, with other bigger features being the headliner.
And another warrior enters the fray! What, pray tell, are those so-important, purchase-deciding FEATURZ that DC lacks and are somehow more important than how the cars handle?
Really? You are so very defensive, but okay, then, dude.
So you complain about lack of information, which is false, because the information is there and for some reason you just didn't bother to go after it.
Then you get called out for it.
Then you say people are being "defensive"...
Wonderful, but you seemed to miss my point, which I refer to above. If a game deserves community or wants to build it, it first needs to be welcoming, not given to add fire needlessly, and to actually make an effort to provide information. That's something you obviously aren't interested in with your angry and, yes, defensive attitude. Thanks for trying, I guess.
...and then you produce that little jewel of a post. And you still don't see why you are wrong?