I don't cosplay or know any cosplayers but it seems to me that a lot of people think you should achieve the most accurate portrayal of a character even though that is inherently impossible.
Idk, I put the craft of making an accurate costume over the person who is wearing the costume. Cosplay wouldn't be half as interesting if your not allowed to cosplay as a character whose not your sex, race, height, weight, or age. Then we wouldn't have awesome cosplay like this:
So why do something as disgusting as blackface in some attempt to enhance our cosplay?
Me too, totally agreed... the fact that these guys DIDN'T change their gender or race portrayal but by contrast still had ultra realistic, well crafted costumes is what makes them so awesome.
If the guy on the right had shitty "light skin" foundation slathered all over him, it would take away from how awesome the costume is. It would totally ruin his presentation. And yeah, part of the costume choice is for comedic effect, but it would be even more true if he was say, dressed as Link.
In fact, oddly enough, I think these guys make a pretty good argument as to why the cosplayer in the OP should've dome the costume without the blackface. An argument that is
aside from historical and sensitivity concerns: quality costumes with the twist that the person wearing them is of a different ethnicity, gender, age, etc make for a much more notable portrayal. Kind of like fan art drawn in styles that are atypical for the IP (
realistic Powerpuff Girls for example). Exceptionally well crafted black Link, or an older person with a grey beard as Link, or female Link, etc, would simply be more memorable than an equally well done costume worn by someone of Link's typical gender age and ethnicity.
Which is exactly why she shouldn't have used the makeup in the OP. (Plus, of course, all the far more legitimate historical reasons. But this is my reasoning from a purely aesthetic perspective.)