Haha what were you expecting with 8x supersampling? Turn it down to 2 or off unless you have a million vram and better cards.
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare PC Performance Thread
- Thread starter fluffydelusions
- Start date
Haha what were you expecting with 8x supersampling? Turn it down to 2 or off unless you have a million vram and better cards.
How would it be a bug? Running at 8x your native resolution is obviously going to be taxing.
Stallion Free
Cock Encumbered
You are aware of what supersampling consists of right?
Actually no
EDIT :
Alright alright..
I've never heard of the supersampling stuff so it just sounded awesome and so I maxed it out lol
Sowy! :C
Now I know better!!!
Actually no
You should Google it then turn it off lol.
Ah yes, I forgot the vsync. MP is 60 fps now.
Does the game load any faster installed to an SSD?
Atraveller
Banned
Not upgrading before a mission didn't fix the out of sync cutscene problem.
ussjtrunks
Member
the odd part is if i reload the mission the video is in sync its very strange
Delt31
Member
PC has aim assist but the flow of the game is not as smooth as PS4. I'm on a 780. apparently others are experiencing this too and to fix you have to run borderless and sync on. Both I don't want to do.
And SSD does NOT give you extra FPS. It has nothing to do with how a game plays. Increase load times yes but that is all.
Ah ok. Thanks for the info!
D
Deleted member 22576
Unconfirmed Member
So how are the 2gig graphics cards doing? I've got a 680.
Devs don't care this is why it continues to happen over and over again.. Watch dogs for example..
Pisses me off, starting to really get over gaming. And im not sure if it's because im past my 30's or because of the absolute shit they release.
Sucks too because in the instances I do get smooth gameplay, the multiplayer is really fun to me.
Decrease usually.
Also, if you're running a game where you fall short on RAM, having quick access to your swap file will help reduce the length of page swap stutters.
Boy-eeee
icecold1983
Member
this game looks and runs much better than bf4
Just fine, at least at more conventional resolutions. I'm on an old 1.2GB GTX 570 and it's been smooth sailing with high textures.
Maxxed out the Game is always around 1.8-2.1 VRAM. 2 are more than fine.
icecold1983
Member
uses all 4gb of my vram at 1080p with no ssaa, so im guessing the engine just caches your entire vram allotment.
Atraveller
Banned
The out of sync problem is annoying.
91fps is more annoying in multiplayer
Actually no
EDIT :
Alright alright..
I've never heard of the supersampling stuff so it just sounded awesome and so I maxed it out lol
Sowy! :C
Now I know better!!!
I bet it looked fucking awesome, though.
crazyturtle
Member
What would be the desktop equivalent of a 750m?
SapientWolf
Trucker Sexologist
It runs better, but it sure doesn't look better.
Don't notice any performance issues running on an i5 750 and 780 GTX, but I'm using a Gsync monitor.
D
Deleted member 22576
Unconfirmed Member
w00t w00t and I'm running 1080 so I'm gonna think about this. I almost wish there was some sort of limited time 19.99 version with just the campaign.
Luftwaffle
Neo Member
I'm getting some really bad random lag mid match sometimes. I will get like 5 fps and can't move my mouse or anything. The game will continue to lag for 10 seconds straight while my hard drive light starts blazing up.
Is there some intermittent loading going on while the game runs? I moved it over to a SSD and it's really improved, but still happens on a lesser scale.
Running on a GTX 760.
Is there some intermittent loading going on while the game runs? I moved it over to a SSD and it's really improved, but still happens on a lesser scale.
Running on a GTX 760.
SolidSnakeUS
Member
For some reason, I have my graphics at the max, but everything is at the lowest detail possible in MP. I don't have SSAA on, but everything else is max. Any idea?
I've heard people say that the shadow caching settings are wonky and are fucking up texture quality. Might try turning those off for now, see if that's it.
cripterion
Member
It's not just about this game, they have game ready drivers usually up before release and even those aren't really "game ready". But the game still runs fine on a single GTX970 at 1080P.
alexandros
Banned
I am really baffled about some of the comments here as well. By most accounts the PC version of Advanced Warfare is really solid with lots of graphical options, great performance and good looks. If there are a couple of bugs with some configurations they will likely be sorted out soon, calling the developers names is completely uncalled for. I find the continuous whining about the quality of the PC versions of current gen games annoying and unjustified. Almost all of them, apart from maybe Watchdogs at launch, look and run much better than the console versions.
Ghosts and Advanced Warfare have inconsistent frametimes here and there without help. But using RTSS with 60 fps limiter, both are PERFECT (in fullscreen). I can play with only one 680GTX locked 60 fps (1080p optimal settings, HBAO+ and SMAA Tx2 filmic) Forcing SLI I can rise the resolution up to 2880x1620 but in a few places the shaders cache doesn't work fine, I guess a new driver is necessary to full sli support.
That's not true. For example in IDTech5 games, every frame the engine has to transcode textures from disk to memory so a fast disk could improve performance.
Another example is with Shaders compiling and cacheing where a slow disk can affect framerate.
Nowadays games need to access disk a lot because levels and assets tend to be bigger and bigger while RAM use is somewhat stagnant.
What SLI bits are you using?
I can't remember the bits (I will post them when I get home), a lot of flags activated in nvidia inspector. But scaling is not 100% at all. 2880x1620 has a 43 fps as mininum in one gpu and 62 as mininum with 3 gpus. Not optimal but good enough taking account the good performance of the game. Problem is that shader cache works fine for one gpu (avoiding hitches while playing when new shaders are needed) but not for more gpus (some shaders are not loaded in loading screen). I think sli bits were similar to farcry3 bits.
d00d3n
Member
I am interested in this as well. The ghost bits didn't seem to improve performance much when I tried them yesterday (although I was trying to run the game smoothly in 120fps, did not test high resolutions).
Edit:
Looking forward to it.
d00d3n
Member
Please do not skip the important part of the message
I am usually deluding myself trying to see the good in SLI. Sorry that it led to a misrepresentation of your message
icecold1983
Member
im referring to SP.
Atraveller
Banned
Still no fix on the cutscene audio syncing problem?
icecold1983
Member
probly be fixed with a patch sometime in the future
I hope so, I am having to deliberately mute volume after completing a level, wait for the damn cutscene to play out (you cant stop it if its the first time you are watching it!), quit then reload mission to watch a new level cutscene with audio in synch with video properly.
Kurt Russell
Member
Put the game in borderless window, then disable Vsync. That fixed it for me.
Edit: I'm an idiot, sorry. That is for people having audio cracking issues during cutscenes, not for lip sync issues.
I hope for a 334.60 driver with SLI support and not a tech article about the game.
