Nothing unethical about stealing from Wal-Mart. I'd say it's actually a good thing.
Why oh why did Neogafshitposts retire?
Nothing unethical about stealing from Wal-Mart. I'd say it's actually a good thing.
I feel bad for those that may have lost their jobs for this, but I have no sympathy whatsoever for Wal-Mart.
I work at Walmart
Really hope nothing happens to my bonus:/
Right, but managers still need to approve at the register right? I don't get where this "loosing jobs" thing comes in. Managers aren't going to loose their jobs over this, and its pretty much out of other employees hands.Better yet, it is their corporate policy.
I doubt the people who took advantage of the WALTONS care that you are condemning their actions. Obviously, you probably already realize that. I am sure the waltons are crying themselves to sleep in their billions.
weird. Best Buy wont match 3rd party sellers so I'm surprised that Walmart would.
Creating fake listings on Amazon to exploit this definitely crosses a line.
Taking advantage of a faulty listing done on Amazon's end is something else entirely than purposefully creating a false listing to mislead another company into price matching.
I'm all for taking advantage of larger corporations when the opportunity presents itself, but not like this.
I cant believe people are sticking up for straight up thievery
It's not thievery, you're still paying for the product, but it's definitely trickery. You're taking advantage of the possibility of someone's ignorance to get a grossly huge discount on something. Not thievery, but not exactly ethical either.
Yes it is.
I love this. More power for those who took advantage of it.
It's almost like you guys didn't read this thread... oh.THOSE POOR MASSIVE CORPORATIONS!
Man there's a lot of morality and ethics police up in here. Not commenting on the morality or ethics of this, mind you. Just pointing out that a bunch of yall sure are high and mighty.
Man there's a lot of morality and ethics police up in here. Not commenting on the morality or ethics of this, mind you. Just pointing out that a bunch of yall sure are high and mighty.
I really think it is. The slippery slope to corporate and consumer armageddon in this thread is funny though.
Who is losing their jobs? Don't managers need to approve this stuff?
Their official policy seems to lack any sort of specificity, which surprises me.
THOSE POOR MASSIVE CORPORATIONS!
It's almost like you guys didn't read this thread... oh.
This is one of those reading comprehension litmus test threads, right?
Yeah, because ethics is a universal standard that everyone agrees upon.
Completely different event. That was a store errorWhy don't you go have a look at the WiiU pricing error thread and then come back. People here went crazy over that yet we're condemning it here.
Look, we may really hate Wal-Mart for their corporate practices and we may hate the laws that make them legal...
But two wrongs definitely do not make a right. Knowingly exploiting a glitch that is by all accounts a mistake is wrong.
There's one currently listed by a third party for $99.
Look, we may really hate Wal-Mart for their corporate practices and we may hate the laws that make them legal...
But two wrongs definitely do not make a right. Knowingly exploiting a glitch that is by all accounts a mistake is wrong.
Completely different event. That was a store error
This is people putting up fake stores with fake low prices and then price matching
Man people read lol. Don't assume
Sorry, no sympathy at all from me. Walmart is legit one of the worst companies in America. I feel for the store-level employees, but it's not my job to look out for their best interest. Dog eat dog.
Oof, completely missing the point.I read the OP. I don't have time to read 11 pages of comments. And well, I don't sympathize with corporative zealots and their artificial, profit centered "morality".
So yea... stick it to those Sales Associates! That'll learn'em!Note that we've had a Walmart employee in here saying stuff like this effects his bonus, presumably his Christmas bonus.
Taken with a grain of salt, if this is true these scammers are not dicking over a corporation, they're dicking over low-level employees who are famous worldwide as being underpaid already.
Yeah, show those poverty-stricken employees, guys. That'll teach Walmart.
So then those that got a WiiU price matched for $60 would equally be in the wrong. That was a glitch as well.
Yes it is.
Price matching the Sears deal is totally fine, that's on Wallmart and it's policies. These fake amazon accounts are way too scummy and scammy.
The only thing hilarious is your need to rely on a utilitarian ethics model to help yourself not feel bad. That's sad. Own up to your shitty practice. At least people earlier in the thread had the balls to say "I don't care about that guy's job, I'm getting mine."Last time I checked, the utilitarian ethics model was worth considering, and it's a hard case to make to consider a corporate entity a human being. If people lose their jobs for following a corporate policy, you don't look to blame the consumers taking advantage of the policy, you blame the authors of punishment. Their principles need to be reviewed.
When consumers make faulty decisions for whatever reasons when doing business with corporations I don't see people running to the consumers defense in those cases: "Should've read the fine print!" "Should've done your research!".
This is some hilarious white-knighting and in actually going to see if I can take advantage of this today, in fact.
I agree with this completely. Sears messing up is a WAY different situation than fake Amazon listings. There's a very thick line between the two.
So? I took advantage of a corporation screwing up and followed Walmart's price matching procedure. It was an accident on their part, not some intention to delibarelty screw over their competition. I am under no obligation to verify whether the listing on the part of Sears was intentional or not. Here it isn't Amazon screwing up but rather somebody trying to pose as Amazon.
You're paying for it though, just significantly less. This isn't a necessary debate because I'm pretty sure we're on the same page morally.
The only thing hilarious is your need to rely on a utilitarian ethics model to help yourself not feel bad. That's sad. Own up to your shitty practice. At least people earlier in the thread had the balls to say "I don't care about that guy's job, I'm getting mine."
I agree with this completely. Sears messing up is a WAY different situation than fake Amazon listings. There's a very thick line between the two.
Look, we may really hate Wal-Mart for their corporate practices and we may hate the laws that make them legal...
But two wrongs definitely do not make a right. Knowingly exploiting a glitch that is by all accounts a mistake is wrong.
Man there's a lot of morality and ethics police up in here. Not commenting on the morality or ethics of this, mind you. Just pointing out that a bunch of yall sure are high and mighty.
Altering the price of an item, and then paying the lower price for that item is literally a felony.
The consumers won.
Fuck big corporations.
I'm looking at this from an ethical perspective. Like the person who put up fake stores on Amazon to gain the system is different than a person who saw a price error at Sears and tried to price match.From the consumer level, they are exactly the same. Taking advantage of a glitch in pricing online. Unless you're honestly telling me that people unknowingly thought a $60 WiiU was a real deal.