Nintendo statement on lack of adaptor in NA.

Gestault

Member
The cost of a part that's already in production like this is negligible, in terms of end-pricing. Accessories are a high-margin item. I understand how pricing can effect marketability, so making the N3DS price appear smaller than it actually is is Nintendo's prerogative. The party benefiting from the change is the producer, not the consumer. I understand many users are upgrading, but considering to sell or trade the redundant unit, you need the power cable to be included, this seems oddly crass reasoning to make a PR statement about.

I understand the overseas markets have had this arrangement for some time. That doesn't make me thrilled about it.
 
Called NOA and the support person had no idea it didn't come with a charger and thought it was idiotic that it didn't come with one. I don't expect them to have a job much longer.

This whole situation is stupid. Include a charger you cheap skates.
 

Vitacat

Member
Called NOA and the support person had no idea it didn't come with a charger and thought it was idiotic that it didn't come with one. I don't expect them to have a job much longer.

This whole situation is stupid. Include a charger you cheap skates.

WOW.

Not the same, but I was in my local Gamestop and the manager didn't know the New 3DS wasn't going to include AC adapter. They will be having lots of fun with angry parents and crying kids in the coming months...
 

pixlexic

Banned
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.
 
I think they are that desperate to reduce costs. When you are making something that is going to be (hopefully) selling tens of millions of units every cent counts, even if it makes you look cheap and petty.

Tens of millions is doubtful. Sales have been in rapid decline, at least in the US.

Even projecting that out to include Europe and Japan, You get somewhere in the mid to high teens over the next couple of years.

Just a matter of time... and with consumer practices like this? Not going to get any better.

It's like newspapers. Sales are through the floor and what they're doing to stay alive is squeezing more and more out of the poor sods still reading them.

i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure.
 
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.

You are smoking something (or just naive) if you think Nintendo would have launched this thing at $209.99. They would (and should) have just eaten the cost to be able to stay under that magical $200 price point. There is a reason most products are $19.99, or 99.99 or 199.99 and not $22.99 or 104.99 or 209.99.
 

pixlexic

Banned
You are smoking something (or just naive) if you think Nintendo would have launched this thing at $209.99. They would (and should) have just eaten the cost to be able to stay under that magical $200 price point. There is a reason most products are $19.99, or 99.99 or 199.99 and not $22.99 or 104.99 or 209.99.

you are naive to think any company is going to eat the cost of any product unless its absolutely needed.

The new 3ds isnt needed to sale 3ds games.
 
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.

They aren't selling this shit at cost, they're already making a profit. It'd just lower their margins. Don't get this idea where everyone thinks a charger that costs them almost nothing to make is going to raise the price of the system. It's to make them more money.

This thread has gone in circles with the same excuses over and over.
 
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.

The problem isn't if whether you can get a charger by external means or not. Nintendo's prioritizing its existing userbase by this move and alienating the new potential users.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.

I doubt it would have cost Nintendo an extra $10 per unit to pack the adapter in with the system. It would have cost something, but I doubt as much as the adapter retails for.

It's a way to charge more without charging more.

The problem isn't if whether you can get a charger by external means or not. Nintendo's prioritizing its existing userbase by this move and alienating the new potential users.

Nintendo isn't prioritizing one user base over another. They are prioritizing revenue over everything else.
 

Mistake

Member
I've had my DS lite since it came out. The R button isn't perfect anymore, but still works. I was considering buying a New 3DS, but searching on google about it just gave me pages and pages on how bad the build quality is for both systems. Not having a charger just topped it. Region free was another issue, but you can get around that eventually. I think it's a real shame, because there were a lot of titles I was interested in.
 

Derpyduck

Banned
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.
Oh hey there's the old "They'd charge you more if they included it." nonsense.
 

Gestault

Member
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.

The manufacturing cost for replacement AC adapters, even by companies without the advantages of scale that Nintendo does, is roughly $.50 USD. Fifty cents. The reason they're handling it this way is because their market response estimates tell them that a system priced above $199.99 will drop in demand, and internally, they want higher margins in the product. Hence, they've split one product into two that an end-user needs to operate the system. By selling the AC adapter at the normal (meaning relatively high) markup in addition to their markup for the core system, they come out ahead compared to what they would otherwise, both in margin and in avoiding a price-point that would stymie interest. It would be contrary to Nintendo's legal obligation to act in the interest of profits to do this unless it specifically gained them a greater net-profit in the end.

This is all fine in its own way, but making a statement that it's done to save consumers money is simply untrue in any broad sense.
 
you are naive to think any company is going to eat the cost of any product unless its absolutely needed.

The new 3ds isnt needed to sale 3ds games.

Of course it's not needed, as evidenced by this thread and others people are willing to give Nintendo an inch while they take a mile and take it smiling.
 
i dont get the back lash. if they included it the system would cost more. not the same.

This way instead of paying $210 you can just buy a adapter for $10 separately or not if you already have one or two.
Nope. n3DS has remained the same price or cheaper in all territories already, so I don't see why NoS would be the only place it's getting more expensive. Definitely just a margin-making money grab, IMO. Desperate times.
 
$25 extra for a USB cable? I don't think so.
No, its about hitting that magic number as 210 looks bad but only 200 and multiples or 25 like 225 look good...

Nope. n3DS has remained the same price or cheaper in all territories already, so I don't see why NoS would be the only place it's getting more expensive. Definitely just a margin-making money grab, IMO. Desperate times.
Same price or cheaper than what? If you're thinking 3DS XL=New 3DS XL you are comparing two systems that don't come with AC adapters. Also what has the exchange rate been doing these days. Maybe $200 no longer makes sense for XL with charger due to a weaker dollar or something?
 

Sapiens

Member
Didn't you know? The new 3DS costs Nintendo $197 to make, which is why they can't pack in a charger that costs them pennies to make and still turn a profit on it at $199. Instead, they'll give new buyers a choice to buy said ultra cheap charger for $10! Imagine being a repeat customer and being burdened with an extra (nearly free) charger cable. Wouldn't that be dreadful? You'd be shackled to it for life. Thank GOD Nintendo thought of them when packaging their new hardware. Aren't they so pro consumer?


So, are you trying to say the Nintendo is giving us the choice of not having to burden ourselves with an extra charger, and this is in fact, a superior configuration?
 

Toxi

Banned
WTF?

No, here is a REAL example of choice.

Have a charger? Sweet, the New 3DS only costs you 220 dollars instead of 230 dollars.
Don't have a charger? The New 3DS costs you 220, and you have to spend 10 dollars to buy the charger.
You are not saving anything from Nintendo not including a charger. The cost is not passed onto the consumer; there is most likely a very large profit margin on the New 3DS and the extra dollar it takes to include a charger does not seriously affect it.

Basically, stop calling this Nintendo saving you money. They are not saving you money by not including a charger.
 

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
Let's be realistic here. Even if the charger was included the system would have still cost 200. This is them trying to get a bit of extra profit.
 

Aske

Member
Why is anyone defending this? The product doesn't work without a propriatory accesory. To not include a power cable is insane from the consumer's perspective.
 

Averon

Member
Why is anyone defending this? The product doesn't work without a propriatory accesory. To not include a power cable is insane from the consumer's perspective.

I really don't know. We got people in here calling AC adapters "luxuries". People upset about no AC adapters included are being called "entitled". People thinking including an adapter would raise the price anywhere from $205 to $230 (!!!).

We're at a point where expecting some way to power your $200 electronic device to be included in the package is a luxury.

It's crazy.
 

Maximo

Member
giphy.gif


Some of the responses to this thread holy hell, Especially the ones about *Nintendo would have raised the Consoles price to $210*
 

Toxi

Banned
Am I the only one who finds it hilarious that some people are calling others entitled for expecting a charger in the box, as if it were some outrageous expectation?
At some point we'll be calling each other entitled for expecting the system in the box.
 

hwy_61

Banned
Honestly, if Nintendo had to exclude anything, I prefer having them not include the stylus before a goddamn charging cable. Buncha cunts.
 

axisofweevils

Holy crap! Today's real megaton is that more than two people can have the same first name.
What was it like when this became the norm in Japan?

Nobody said peep when this launched in Australia.

Personally, I think it is all about Nintendo standardising packaging. The New 3DS packaging is far smaller than the 3DS OG. To be honest, I'm not even sure if a charger could fit in it.

In other words, name a country where the New 3DS / XL is released... It didn't have a charger included in the box.
 

Vena

Member
I've had my DS lite since it came out. The R button isn't perfect anymore, but still works. I was considering buying a New 3DS, but searching on google about it just gave me pages and pages on how bad the build quality is for both systems. Not having a charger just topped it. Region free was another issue, but you can get around that eventually. I think it's a real shame, because there were a lot of titles I was interested in.

The N3DS? The N3DS is built on par, if not better, than the Lite. It's the OG 3DS that was a pile of crap in terms of its build.

Anyone you ask about the build quality of the N3DS will tell you its actually very, very good. So I'm not sure what you were reading... or even what you googled. You were probably reading reviews of the old 3DS.

The manufacturing cost for replacement AC adapters, even by companies without the advantages of scale that Nintendo does, is roughly $.50 USD. Fifty cents. The reason they're handling it this way is because their market response estimates tell them that a system priced above $199.99 will drop in demand, and internally, they want higher margins in the product. Hence, they've split one product into two that an end-user needs to operate the system. By selling the AC adapter at the normal (meaning relatively high) markup in addition to their markup for the core system, they come out ahead compared to what they would otherwise, both in margin and in avoiding a price-point that would stymie interest. It would be contrary to Nintendo's legal obligation to act in the interest of profits to do this unless it specifically gained them a greater net-profit in the end.

This is all fine in its own way, but making a statement that it's done to save consumers money is simply untrue in any broad sense.

The real cost saver for Nintendo isn't the charger. Its the box size. Compare an OG XL box to the size of a NXL box.
 

Two Words

Member
Can't see the problem here... That's a pretty reasonable explanation. The console would cost more if they included the adaptor as standard. Now you're saving money if you don't need the adaptor, or paying what it would have cost had they included the adaptor as standard if you buy the adaptor seperately.
No, they were never going to charge $210 or anything like that. This only increases their profits.
 

Christopher

Member
So what's to say that the fucking Scalpers won't buy all the Chargers as seen by the GameCube adaptor/Amibbo fiasco - and you'd have to pay top dollar go get one. What if they are sold out in stores too you can't charge your 3DS???

Include it in the box so those defending this practice it's just insane
 
Why is anyone defending this? The product doesn't work without a propriatory accesory. To not include a power cable is insane from the consumer's perspective.

I don't know why anyone would defend this. None of the defenses make any sense to me.

I mean, I've seen company/brand/product loyalty before. But the stuff from the Nintendo hardcore fans in this thread, wow...
 
So after thinking about this quite a bit, I've decided to not only not get the new 3DS, but I've also decided I'm getting rid of my other 3DS systems. I've bought 9 systems for myself, family and friends, and I've spent over $1,600 in software for them.

Sample size of one, but Nintendo has lost at least one dedicated, high spend customer. Hope the $1 they saved on the charger is worth it to them. I guess it must be.

So what's to say that the fucking Scalpers won't buy all the Chargers as seen by the GameCube adaptor/Amibbo fiasco - and you'd have to pay top dollar go get one. What if they are sold out in stores too you can't charge your 3DS???

Include it in the box so those defending this practice it's just insane

This has been responded to before in the thread... Craigslist was actually thrown out there or asking friends for one of their extras. Seriously.
 

Vitacat

Member
So what's to say that the fucking Scalpers won't buy all the Chargers as seen by the GameCube adaptor/Amibbo fiasco - and you'd have to pay top dollar go get one. What if they are sold out in stores too you can't charge your 3DS???

OMG, wow. Now that would be complete chaos. LOL. Not gonna happen but funny to think about.

Just imagine AC adapters going for $50 each on eBay.

Glad I have 2 adapters on the way (for me and my wife, for our pre-ordered New XL's) just in case! =P
 

Tablo

Member
I can't believe people are stilled riled up about this, is there some sort of pertinent reason this thread is still going on?
 
I can't believe people are stilled riled up about this, is there some sort of pertinent reason this thread is still going on?


There's people who are saying "its okay, leave Nintendo Alone!_ they're only trying to help you!"

The thread will continue as long as that mentality exists.

I'm still upset about the no charger. Hoping they change their mind before launch and give a voucher or something.
 

bomblord1

Banned
I can't believe people are stilled riled up about this, is there some sort of pertinent reason this thread is still going on?

Because people are seriously that upset about it. Don't ask my why but not including an $8 charger is apparently blatanly anti-consumer and the whole company needs to burn for it.

If Nintendo even dares to try to make a few extra bucks consumers are being taken advantage of. Not to mention they fact the fact they are obviously turning such a massive profit that saving a few million dollars is unneeded.
 

Toad King

Banned
A lot of people are upset that a company is trying to make more money. The no-charger basically boils down to these things:

* Money. They cost money to put in and lots of people have their old ones lying around and don't need another.
* E-waste laws in the EU put penalties for stuff like chargers in electronics. It's part of the reason for the push for universal phone chargers in the EU. I'm not certain but JP might have similar laws which would explain no chargers there either.
* Parity of SKUs in all regions. Having two separate SKUs with the charger being the sole difference is more complicated than just one.

If the $8 a charger will cost breaks it for you then don't buy it.
 

Toxi

Banned
Because people are seriously that upset about it. Don't ask my why but not including an $8 charger is apparently blatanly anti-consumer and the whole company needs to burn for it.

If Nintendo even dares to try to make a few extra bucks consumers are being taken advantage of. Not to mention they fact the fact they are obviously turning such a massive profit that saving a few million dollars is unneeded.
Yes, we know Nintendo is trying to make money and isn't in the best economic situation. Why should we care? We don't make a dime off of their profits. If their approach results in a lesser product, then we will voice our opinion and choose not to buy it.

Perhaps you forgot that you aren't a Nintendo stock holder.
 
People take their chargers very seriously. Pretty shitty on Nintendo but people are in here saying they'll never purchase a Nintendo system again due to an 8$ charger...

EDIT: Also, the n3DS XL is going for $329.99 here in Canada, so bumping the price to $209.99 for adding a charger wouldn't be too weird of a price. Food for thought.
 
Top Bottom