If you wouldn't date transgender people, where do you begin to regard their gender?

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingFire

Banned
I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:

GPFW5ZW.png


I would not date a transgender person.
 

Lagamorph

Member
The only reason I wouldn't date a transgender person is because I want to have children of my own, so I wouldn't want to be in a relationship knowing that it'll ultimately have to end just so I can fulfil my own desires. It wouldn't be fair on either of us.
 
If you want to do more than rail in anger, you might want to practice some empathy-- even if you don't agree with the motives yourself. After all, isn't that what you would require white cis men to do?

Fair enough. Those are some big shoes to fill and I wouldn't be surprised you didn't find someone of any gender/ethnicity to fill them.

Oh, plenty of people meet those standards. I just haven't met a white cis male who does.

I imagine the magnitude of a cis male's insecurities are tiny in comparison to yours, and fear of rejection based on your identity keeps you away from them altogether. That's just a guess though.

Did you miss the part where I identified as queer?

The only reason I wouldn't date a transgender person is because I want to have children of my own, so I wouldn't want to be in a relationship knowing that it'll ultimately have to end just so I can fulfil my own desires. It wouldn't be fair on either of us.

Technically, a large percentage of transgender people are capable of carrying children. Erasing all trans identities except AMAB trans folk is problematic.
 
I'm responding entirely to the idea that "personal preference" and "completely normal in society" are good enough reasons to hold a belief. Not to the prior posts. I don't know what the previously quoted poster was implying or meaning.
They're good enough reasons when that belief is doing nothing but denying the other person a date. Nobody owes anyone a date in the first place, and no one is degraded or losing their rights by someone rejecting them, unless they're straight up coming out and saying an offensive reason of why they're not attracted to the person.

You compared it to a situation where people were slaves. That's not a comparable situation to someone's personal preferences not matching up with the looks of someone who is interested in dating them.
 
"I think Native American/black people aren't real people, they are savages."

This was a completely normal view in society pretty recently and a "personal preference."

It has no basis in reality obviously but it fits your criteria.

This right here folks is an example of a strawman.

Taking what I say and putting it into extreme context does very little to prove your point and actually hurts it.


he wrote that he wouldn't date a trans woman but would let her suck his dick. Do you have any idea how dehumanizing for trans woman such statement is?

Do you have any idea how much you are exaggerating? I have heard straight people say worse about the opposite sex, you just seem like you are tripping over yourself to be offended.
 

Newt

Member
Are you saying we should all be bisexual?
That was just a joke post, lol.

The reality is just that by refusing to date a transgendered person is that you're just accepting that dating them has too many disadvantages compared to dating a cisgendered person. They're not equal, surgeries aren't perfect, and trying to attribute it to preference is just dodging the truth.
 

Meffer

Member
I couldn't. I'm all for them wanting to be who they want to be. But I couldn't date or be in a sexual relationship with a transperson. They can be family or friends but nothing intimate.
 
If you are attracted to someone and are someone who doesn't let gender fluidity act as an impediment towards mutual happiness, then

post-11694-Harrison-Ford-Who-Gives-a-Shit-ziGh.gif


If you are don't find yourself attracted to a transgendered person before or after realizing that they've had a transition in their life, then

post-11694-Harrison-Ford-Who-Gives-a-Shit-ziGh.gif


Attractions are fickle chemistry and highly subjective and don't necessarily conform to things that are convenient for you, which is why gay teens who identify on the extreme end of the kinsey scale will voluntarily go to a conversion camp and then live with complete anguish when those involuntary sexual attractions don't go away.

If you treat a transgendered person with a single ounce less of human dignity than you give the average cis person off the street, only then you are a terrible human being and I hope through time and patience of others, you come around and join a major social shift happening in our society.
 

RM8

Member
The asexual analogy is pretty bad because asexuality doesn't come from any judgement. It's not a case of "no one has the exact set of traits that I need to be attracted to someone". I personally don't think having preferences equals prejudice, though, I just wanted to point out that.
 

balgajo

Member
No, because he thought that the vagina is artificial and made from a penis would be too much of a mental hurdle for me to clear when there's any one 99% of women with natural vaginas I could date instead. And that's just assuming that the vulva is perfectly indistinguishable from a natural, non-constructed one. If that's not the case (and I've never seen a MtF vulva) then that would be a 100% deal-breaker immediately anyway. Even just the idea that there's no uterus or the rest of the female sexual reproductive organs there would put me off hugely, to be honest. I wouldn't feel like I was putting my dick into a woman with that knowledge in my head, no matter what she looked like. That would be a 'male abdomen', even if on a person I had been dating as a woman and considered a woman.

This biological stuff matters to me sexually and I certainly feel no shame about saying it. I think by saying it, in fact, it might help some people who aren't so biologically-minded understand the reluctance of some of us to date trans people.

I really agree with that Griss.
But there something I've been asking to myself: What would I do if i discovered that my girlfriend is actually a transgender woman?
I mean, I'm in an almost 7 years relationship with a girl that I really like and I have evidence enough to believe she isn't a transgender woman. But let's say some big Deus Ex Machina happens in my life and I discover so. I really think that I wouldn't break up with her and somehow I would understand the reason for her hiding this from me for all this time.
Considering that I am a biologically-minded person, the thought of her not being born as a woman(sex) would probably lead me to not feel attraction towards her anymore and results in our relationship falling apart naturally.
But who knows..
 

Ties

Banned
If you are attracted to someone and are someone who doesn't let gender fluidity act as an impediment towards mutual happiness, then

post-11694-Harrison-Ford-Who-Gives-a-Shit-ziGh.gif


If you are don't find yourself attracted to a transgendered person before or after realizing that they've had a transition in their life, then

post-11694-Harrison-Ford-Who-Gives-a-Shit-ziGh.gif


Attractions are fickle chemistry and highly subjective and don't necessarily conform to things that are convenient for you, which is why gay teens who identify on the extreme end of the kinsey scale will voluntarily go to a conversion camp and then live with complete anguish when those involuntary sexual attractions don't go away.

If you treat a transgendered person with a single ounce less of human dignity than you give the average cis person off the street, only then you are a terrible human being and I hope through time and patience of others, you come around and join a major social shift happening in our society.
tell them

neogaf turning into a conservative forum now

completely shocking to read some social opinions on neogaf and compare the views to my age group

post-11694-Harrison-Ford-Who-Gives-a-Shit-ziGh.gif
 
I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:

GPFW5ZW.png


I would not date a transgender person.

Being the owner of this forum doesnt not make all of his opinions some kind of moral golden rule. In this case I would say his opinion is filled with toxic prejudices.
 

Mumei

Member
Personally I think asking "how would you know" is the wrong question, because the implication is that they shouldn't tell you about it and you would never know the difference.

If my significant other didn't trust me enough to tell me something like that, then the relationship is already compromised. I don't want to be with someone who withholds information like that from me.

...

I was not talking about that. He made a several factual claims about differences between the genitalia of trans woman as compared to cis women. I have heard varying claims on this issue, and haven't investigated it myself. He seemed very confident in his assertions, so I asked him how he got his knowledge. I didn't feel like the answer he gave me was very illuminating, so I tried asking again in a different way.

You should read the start of a conversation to make sure you actually understand what people are talking about, or something like this will happen.

California's the only state that's banned the trans panic defense, and that only happened a handful of months ago. It's still a valid legal defense in the rest of the US.

Oh, I see. I was thinking about whether it worked, which is a different question than whether it can be used. Sorry!
 

FartOfWar

Banned
There's a gestalt shift involved in so far as I socially regard transwomen as women and refer to them as such. Sexually, I must admit, I am unable to regard transwomen in precisely the way I regard cis-women. I have no sexual interest in transwomen. Clearly, and fortunately, some cis-men do not share this perspective. But to ask "how could a cis-man not want to have sex with let alone date a transwoman?" isn't far from asking "how can a gay man not want to have sex with a woman?" in so far as when the gestalt framing is sexual (I emphasize sexual), some unequivocally straight cis-men simply are unable to perceive transwomen as women.
 

Petrie

Banned
Unless the operation was in a third-world country and it was a botched job, no, you and 99% of GAF couldn't tell the difference, I guarantee you that much.

If you really think someone eating pussy can't tell the difference, nothing can help you. I'm not arguing that fucking they might not be able to, but down inside, they aren't even close.
 

wildfire

Banned
Oh, plenty of people meet those standards. I just haven't met a white cis male who does.
That's pretty rough. Even in this thread I feel quite a few posters would meet your criteria. It's a shame you haven't encountered such people face to face.


Technically, a large percentage of transgender people are capable of carrying children. Erasing all trans identities except AMAB trans folk is problematic.

Yeah half the trans pop can do that but isn't the case most of them would still need a surrogate due to sexual orientation?
 

Coconut

Banned
I wish some people would read my post from the last page. Instead of disregarding peoples preferences and putting words like "gross" into peoples mouths.

If your opinion is as ignorant as evilore I hope less people read it.

There's alot of misconceptions in his post.
 

Lagamorph

Member
Technically, a large percentage of transgender people are capable of carrying children. Erasing all trans identities except AMAB trans folk is problematic.
Unless male to female transgender people are having fully functional wombs, ovaries, etc implanted, then I don't think it's going to work out for me.
 

ItIsOkBro

Member
all I know is if I'm attracted to someone, then I find out they're transgender, and then I stop being attracted to them, I've got some issues to work out.
 
Is this kind of degrading shit necessary? Are you implying that trans woman aren't good enough, woman enough or even *people* enough for you to give them the privilege of your vaginal/anal penetration? Ugh.

I'm not implying anything of the sort.

Of course they are people.

UGH!!!


I read that as trolling, tbh.

Loads of guys act like they have this surplus of irresistible sexual attraction and so they just have to strike off potential recipients of their dongs for the sake of self-preservation. In reality, they sit at home furiously beating their meat and making grand declaratory statements in the off topic section of a notoriously combustible gaming forum.

Cute accusations. All false of course. I do just fine out there.
 
So you're basically saying dating a trans-woman is less favourable because it has disadvantages attached to it?

I don't disagree with you, I'm just wondering if that's your point.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I am not issuing a statement on the value proposition of x relationships over y. What I am saying is that for me personally, I have no interest in a romantic relationship with a transgendered woman. I don't date lots of people for various reasons, and likewise they shouldn't care or have input on what I find sexually stimulating.
 
Spending time in intersectional feminist circles helps with this.
Not to derail but I wasn't familiar with the term so I looked it up. In case anyone is interested:
The textbook definition states:

"The view that women experience oppression in varying configurations and in varying degrees of intensity. Cultural patterns of oppression are not only interrelated, but are bound together and influenced by the intersectional systems of society. Examples of this include race, gender, class, ability, and ethnicity."

In other words, certain groups of women have multi-layered facets in life that they have to deal with. There is no one-size-fits-all type of feminism...
 

He is basically saying trans people should "deal with it" instead of trying to challenge the social and cultural constructs that create the toxic, dehumanizing view that trans women are not real women.

I'm not implying anything of the sort.

Of course they are people.

UGH!!!

well, it reads like that. "I am just gonna let you suck my dick" is a casual way of saying "I think less of you, so I will only grant you certain level of interaction with me".
 

knicks

Member
I couldn't. I'm all for them wanting to be who they want to be. But I couldn't date or be in a sexual relationship with a transperson. They can be family or friends but nothing intimate.

Pretty much agree with this. I'm very open-minded. Supportive of same-sex marriage, supportive of the transgendered community. However, I don't think I could ever be in a romantic relationship with a transgendered person. I'm sorry if that's wrong, or mean.
 
...

I was not talking about that. He made a several factual claims about differences between the genitalia of trans woman as compared to cis women. I have heard varying claims on this issue, and haven't investigated it myself. He seemed very confident in his assertions, so I asked him how he got his knowledge. I didn't feel like the answer he gave me was very illuminating, so I tried asking again in a different way.

You should read the start of a conversation to make sure you actually understand what people are talking about, or something like this will happen.

I understand all of this. I was using what you posted as a branching point.

Regardless of whether someone would know, it's something they should know, in the context of a real relationship.
 

KingFire

Banned
Being the owner of this forum doesnt not make all of his opinions some kind of moral golden rule. In this case I would say his opinion is filled with toxic prejudices.

Rationality is toxic now? I get it you disagree with us, but you do not have to call our opinions "toxic" and whatnot just because we do not agree. You can disagree, justify it, and continue to discuss in a civilized language.
 

injurai

Banned
If your opinion is as ignorant as evilore I hope less people read it.

There's alot of misconceptions in his post.

How about you read it, and stop acting like a fool.

Then we can maybe engage some discussion and ignorance on both sides can be worked through.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
Thanks for the vote of confidence that I could oppress cis white men from my socioeconomic strata.



California's the only state that's banned the trans panic defense, and that only happened a handful of months ago. It's still a valid legal defense in the rest of the US.

Valid legal defense as in they can claim it legally without enforcement, but statistically that defense isn't effective. This defense often fails, and has been ruled inadmissible in many jurisdictions.
 

jdouglas

Member
Spending time in intersectional feminist circles helps with this.

Damn..."my feminism is better than yours"

I don't agree with a lot of things that you believe in. I don't even know if "agree" or "believe" are the right verbs to convey that feeling, but I digress.

I understand your purpose though. You're the group that calibrate the national paradigm to an appropriate level between "your" view of feminism and, say, Fox News' view on feminism.
 

FartOfWar

Banned
He is basically saying trans people should "deal with it" instead of trying to challenge the social and cultural constructs that create the toxic, dehumanizing view that trans women are not real women.

I saw nothing of the sort. His response seemed to address nothing more than his own highly personal, sexual preference.
 

WaffleTaco

Wants to outlaw technological innovation.
I wouldn't date transgender people but I respect their rights. That's all that matters.

How about you explain why first? What is the difference between you dating a cis woman and a trans woman who is post op? The trans woman, looks like a woman, acts like a woman, has breasts and a vagina as a woman, and you can't tell the difference, yet you would not date them?
 
Yeah half the trans pop can do that but isn't the case most of them would still need a surrogate due to sexual orientation?

There was a really awesome article I read a while back that went in depth as to why birth control and other forms of contraception were an LGBT issue. It broke down statistics about how a majority of queer-identified folk regularly have sex that can lead to pregnancy. I can't find it at the moment, but if I do, I'll post it.

Damn..."my feminism is better than yours"

I don't agree with a lot of things that you believe in. I don't even know if "agree" or "believe" are the right verbs to convey that feeling, but I digress.

I understand your purpose though. You're the group that calibrate the national paradigm to an appropriate level between "your" view of feminism and, say, Fox News' view on feminism.

At the very least, it's better than white feminism.

I'm aware that I'm an outlier. I'm okay with that.
 

Osiris

I permanently banned my 6 year old daughter from using the PS4 for mistakenly sending grief reports as it's too hard to watch or talk to her
There is a divide that is a hard to bridge.

For some people, accepting and respecting a transgender persons choice to transition is not enough, they are also expected to accept the transgenders new identity as fully a male/female as someone who was born the equivalent biological sex.

That's difficult for me, and not something likely to change, either through debate or life experience (Too old. :p)

I accept and respect a transgender persons choice to identity how they wish whether transitioned or not, I do not however agree with the idea that a person who has transitioned is no different to a person born of the sex a transgender person chose to identify as.

This I can understand is upsetting to a transgender person, it means there is therefore a "limitation" on how far I consider a person to have "become" the gender that they identify as, but the cold hard truth is yes, that is true, to me and others there is a limitation that falls short of fully male/female than no transgender person can go beyond.

I respect your choice, I respect your decision to identify how you choose and I am truly truly sorry that those limitations exist, but for me, in all honesty, they do, for others they do and the degree that you may or may not pass will not change this.
 
Rationality is toxic now? I get it you disagree with us, but you do not have to call our opinions "toxic" and whatnot just because we do not agree. You can disagree, justify it, and continue to discuss in a civilized language.

"Despite your transitioning, you obviously aren't going to look/feel like entirely like a real woman in many ways." is pretty obviously toxic and is kind of fucking weird when applied to cis woman as well. There are tons of cis woman with masculine features who don't "look like a real woman in many ways."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom