davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
Well by technical definition yes, but if you're prejudiced against everyone you approach being prejudiced to no-one. Kinda like trying to divide 1 by infinity.
But Infinity is greater than 0...
Well by technical definition yes, but if you're prejudiced against everyone you approach being prejudiced to no-one. Kinda like trying to divide 1 by infinity.
Absolutely not.So if someone is asexual does that mean they are prejudiced against everyone?
Well by technical definition yes, but if you're prejudiced against everyone you approach being prejudiced to no-one. Kinda like trying to divide 1 by infinity.
If you want to do more than rail in anger, you might want to practice some empathy-- even if you don't agree with the motives yourself. After all, isn't that what you would require white cis men to do?
Fair enough. Those are some big shoes to fill and I wouldn't be surprised you didn't find someone of any gender/ethnicity to fill them.
I imagine the magnitude of a cis male's insecurities are tiny in comparison to yours, and fear of rejection based on your identity keeps you away from them altogether. That's just a guess though.
The only reason I wouldn't date a transgender person is because I want to have children of my own, so I wouldn't want to be in a relationship knowing that it'll ultimately have to end just so I can fulfil my own desires. It wouldn't be fair on either of us.
They're good enough reasons when that belief is doing nothing but denying the other person a date. Nobody owes anyone a date in the first place, and no one is degraded or losing their rights by someone rejecting them, unless they're straight up coming out and saying an offensive reason of why they're not attracted to the person.I'm responding entirely to the idea that "personal preference" and "completely normal in society" are good enough reasons to hold a belief. Not to the prior posts. I don't know what the previously quoted poster was implying or meaning.
Yup. That's about right.I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:
![]()
I would not date a transgender person.
"I think Native American/black people aren't real people, they are savages."
This was a completely normal view in society pretty recently and a "personal preference."
It has no basis in reality obviously but it fits your criteria.
he wrote that he wouldn't date a trans woman but would let her suck his dick. Do you have any idea how dehumanizing for trans woman such statement is?
That was just a joke post, lol.Are you saying we should all be bisexual?
You must be around a lot of lofty people then because I don't know anyone, cis white male or otherwise, who fits that bill and I'm quite proud of my circle of friends and acquaintances.Oh, plenty of people meet those standards. I just haven't met a white cis male who does.
I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:
![]()
I would not date a transgender person.
You must be around a lot of lofty people then because I don't know anyone, cis white male or otherwise, who fits that bill and I'm quite proud of my circle of friends and acquaintances.
the old preferences argument being used again to rationalize prejudice in this thread i see
I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:
![]()
I would not date a transgender person.
I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:
![]()
I would not date a transgender person.
No, because he thought that the vagina is artificial and made from a penis would be too much of a mental hurdle for me to clear when there's any one 99% of women with natural vaginas I could date instead. And that's just assuming that the vulva is perfectly indistinguishable from a natural, non-constructed one. If that's not the case (and I've never seen a MtF vulva) then that would be a 100% deal-breaker immediately anyway. Even just the idea that there's no uterus or the rest of the female sexual reproductive organs there would put me off hugely, to be honest. I wouldn't feel like I was putting my dick into a woman with that knowledge in my head, no matter what she looked like. That would be a 'male abdomen', even if on a person I had been dating as a woman and considered a woman.
This biological stuff matters to me sexually and I certainly feel no shame about saying it. I think by saying it, in fact, it might help some people who aren't so biologically-minded understand the reluctance of some of us to date trans people.
tell themIf you are attracted to someone and are someone who doesn't let gender fluidity act as an impediment towards mutual happiness, then
![]()
If you are don't find yourself attracted to a transgendered person before or after realizing that they've had a transition in their life, then
![]()
Attractions are fickle chemistry and highly subjective and don't necessarily conform to things that are convenient for you, which is why gay teens who identify on the extreme end of the kinsey scale will voluntarily go to a conversion camp and then live with complete anguish when those involuntary sexual attractions don't go away.
If you treat a transgendered person with a single ounce less of human dignity than you give the average cis person off the street, only then you are a terrible human being and I hope through time and patience of others, you come around and join a major social shift happening in our society.
I share Evilore's opinion regarding this topic:
![]()
I would not date a transgender person.
the old preferences argument being used again to rationalize prejudice in this thread i see
What a polite and scientific way of saying "no it's gross."
Personally I think asking "how would you know" is the wrong question, because the implication is that they shouldn't tell you about it and you would never know the difference.
If my significant other didn't trust me enough to tell me something like that, then the relationship is already compromised. I don't want to be with someone who withholds information like that from me.
California's the only state that's banned the trans panic defense, and that only happened a handful of months ago. It's still a valid legal defense in the rest of the US.
Unless the operation was in a third-world country and it was a botched job, no, you and 99% of GAF couldn't tell the difference, I guarantee you that much.
Being the owner of this forum doesnt not make all of his opinions some kind of moral golden rule. In this case I would say his opinion is filled with toxic prejudices.
That's pretty rough. Even in this thread I feel quite a few posters would meet your criteria. It's a shame you haven't encountered such people face to face.Oh, plenty of people meet those standards. I just haven't met a white cis male who does.
Technically, a large percentage of transgender people are capable of carrying children. Erasing all trans identities except AMAB trans folk is problematic.
I wish some people would read my post from the last page. Instead of disregarding peoples preferences and putting words like "gross" into peoples mouths.
If you really think someone eating pussy can't tell the difference, nothing can help you. I'm not arguing that fucking they might not be able to, but down inside, they aren't even close.
Unless male to female transgender people are having fully functional wombs, ovaries, etc implanted, then I don't think it's going to work out for me.Technically, a large percentage of transgender people are capable of carrying children. Erasing all trans identities except AMAB trans folk is problematic.
Is this kind of degrading shit necessary? Are you implying that trans woman aren't good enough, woman enough or even *people* enough for you to give them the privilege of your vaginal/anal penetration? Ugh.
I read that as trolling, tbh.
Loads of guys act like they have this surplus of irresistible sexual attraction and so they just have to strike off potential recipients of their dongs for the sake of self-preservation. In reality, they sit at home furiously beating their meat and making grand declaratory statements in the off topic section of a notoriously combustible gaming forum.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I am not issuing a statement on the value proposition of x relationships over y. What I am saying is that for me personally, I have no interest in a romantic relationship with a transgendered woman. I don't date lots of people for various reasons, and likewise they shouldn't care or have input on what I find sexually stimulating.So you're basically saying dating a trans-woman is less favourable because it has disadvantages attached to it?
I don't disagree with you, I'm just wondering if that's your point.
Not to derail but I wasn't familiar with the term so I looked it up. In case anyone is interested:Spending time in intersectional feminist circles helps with this.
The textbook definition states:
"The view that women experience oppression in varying configurations and in varying degrees of intensity. Cultural patterns of oppression are not only interrelated, but are bound together and influenced by the intersectional systems of society. Examples of this include race, gender, class, ability, and ethnicity."
In other words, certain groups of women have multi-layered facets in life that they have to deal with. There is no one-size-fits-all type of feminism...
Explain.
I'm not implying anything of the sort.
Of course they are people.
UGH!!!
I couldn't. I'm all for them wanting to be who they want to be. But I couldn't date or be in a sexual relationship with a transperson. They can be family or friends but nothing intimate.
...
I was not talking about that. He made a several factual claims about differences between the genitalia of trans woman as compared to cis women. I have heard varying claims on this issue, and haven't investigated it myself. He seemed very confident in his assertions, so I asked him how he got his knowledge. I didn't feel like the answer he gave me was very illuminating, so I tried asking again in a different way.
You should read the start of a conversation to make sure you actually understand what people are talking about, or something like this will happen.
Being the owner of this forum doesnt not make all of his opinions some kind of moral golden rule. In this case I would say his opinion is filled with toxic prejudices.
If your opinion is as ignorant as evilore I hope less people read it.
There's alot of misconceptions in his post.
Thanks for the vote of confidence that I could oppress cis white men from my socioeconomic strata.
California's the only state that's banned the trans panic defense, and that only happened a handful of months ago. It's still a valid legal defense in the rest of the US.
Spending time in intersectional feminist circles helps with this.
And yet not one person in this thread has been able to offer any information about this most crucial info.
Are you saying we should all be bisexual?
He is basically saying trans people should "deal with it" instead of trying to challenge the social and cultural constructs that create the toxic, dehumanizing view that trans women are not real women.
I wouldn't date transgender people but I respect their rights. That's all that matters.
Yeah half the trans pop can do that but isn't the case most of them would still need a surrogate due to sexual orientation?
Damn..."my feminism is better than yours"
I don't agree with a lot of things that you believe in. I don't even know if "agree" or "believe" are the right verbs to convey that feeling, but I digress.
I understand your purpose though. You're the group that calibrate the national paradigm to an appropriate level between "your" view of feminism and, say, Fox News' view on feminism.
Rationality is toxic now? I get it you disagree with us, but you do not have to call our opinions "toxic" and whatnot just because we do not agree. You can disagree, justify it, and continue to discuss in a civilized language.