She is making it harder for women, there is no denying that. Are you seriously trying to justify, because one side is doing something bad, the other side is excused from it, no matter the level of severity. Like come on. Also I think you need to read my posts, I'm saying she is adding on more bullshit needlessly through her actions; I am not saying the other side is justified in their actions. I do not understand how people are misconstruing my point.
Is this really a difficult thing to comprehend? I mean it's straight forward, one side does fucked up shit, and the other side doesn't help their situation, in fact making it worse, and yet they are saints and should not be critiqued, because how dare they, they were treated worse. I'm sorry shitty behaviour does not justify other shitty behaviour, no matter the severity. You only help in continue that cycle through those actions.
Oh how cute, you even have that new eurogamer review method. Both sides is a correct statement when they are both doing really shitty things and not helping their case at all pro-gg people of course with their swatting, death threats, doxxing etc... (even though they would like to believe it's for ethics in journalism - how they even believe they are fighting for that battle is beyond me at this point) and the victim creating scenarios which propagate and reinforce the sentiment against uninformed individuals and those part of it, which only further adds fuel to the fire - needlessly I might add.
Apparently any sort of critiquing is some sort of sentence to being cast as a gamergater. It's honestly tiresome at this point. This will be my last posting concerning anything related to gamergate, it's just not worth the headache and false accusations. Anyone who does anything against the norm is just automatically casted in with a group of morons, this board is about having discussions of topics and not being told to "fuck off", "shove it up your ass", "you are part of gamergate" because of a differing opinion - I would like to believe any opinion can be presented and discussed without throwing it to the side and being automatically put as an outcast for even the most minute of differing views. News flash, not everyone is a gamergater because they like to critically discuss a topic.
Yes, one persons behaviour does not absolve the other persons, no matter the severity. You are not going to be off the hook just because the other side is doing fucked up things, it does not justify your actions. It's like telling someone to murder a person who is a known murderer and who just killed someone last night. The end does not justify the means.
See, here's the thing. They receive endless harassment which can heavily effect a person's behavior. It has not ended for them. If Brianna or anyone has said anything dumb, they have apologized for it. Now if someone from GamerGate does something the other person will just call false flag and say that they had nothing to do with it and have no control over the other people in their movement. The person calling Brianna, Anita, Zoe or anyone the worst things you can imagine, will never, ever apologize for it because that is their goal.
And guess what, if you disagree with GamerGate, you're anti-GamerGate! But there is no such thing as anti-GamerGate, it's a false dichotomy to make it look like they have an opposing force when in reality the entire world is against them. There is no middle ground in this. They are a hate group, plain and simple.
Seriously, look at this.
https://twitter.com/srhbutts/status/565757271389782016
https://twitter.com/desertfox899/status/565747351688445953
GamerGate. Wants. People. Dead. They happily look up to villains in media and embrace them.
--
What people may have a problem with is your words. In the old Gamergate thread there were a lot of people saying similar things with absolutely nothing to back up their claims while linking to Internet Aristocrat, Sargon of Arkkad and many other prominent GamerGaters and websites that have no legitimacy. We've all seen it before so any hostility you're getting comes from experience for the last 7 months across this forum and all of social media. So pardon me if I cannot find a middle ground in all of this.