First Look at Jason Momoa as AQUAMAN

Status
Not open for further replies.

ryan299

Member
Because the MCU is built off of quality films such as Hulk, The Incredible Hulk. Thor, and Thor The Dark Age.

Don't forget Iron Man 2 and 3 lol.

I rather WB do their universe the way they're doing it now. I don't want to see a bunch of solo films then a near decade build up to JL. Rather have JL then spin off and show solo characters. Plus I bet if WB copied Marvel with a bunch of solo origin movies they would get shit on.
 

ezekial45

Banned
If the Aquaman movie is successful, I wouldn't mind seeing Aqualad appear in the DCMU

Brightestday10-1-.jpg
 

Amir0x

Banned
Why should fucking AQUAMAN be "carefully introduced" via a two hour film of his own?

There's nothing about fuckin Aquaman (or any superhero, really) that necessitates two hours of introduction for an audience to roll with it. Now if you have two hours worth of an Aquaman story that you want to tell, then by all means, make an Aquaman movie. But if you're suggesting the only way to get an audience to understand the idea of a decades-old superhero based on a CENTURIES old Greek God is to "carefully introduce him" in his own epic adventure film, I'm going to suggest that conventional wisdom you're trying to share is pretty busted.

The exact same shit could have been said about Thor. Thor is based on norse mythology and all sorts of lame associated shit has to be set up to make the universe make sense. More awful comic stories related to Thor than good ones. But there's a few good ones, same with Aquaman.

But if you don't have the confidence in your characters to think it's worth establishing real narrative weight with them, that's an even bigger problem. The point is to make these characters worth a damn in the cinematic universe. That's what Marvel keeps doing, because they're taking their time. Honestly few people gave a shit about Guardians of the Galaxy before the films, just look out how popular they were. And now people are interested. If you do it right, you can make concepts that aren't particularly compelling on paper work well for film.

It's a problem making a film to introduce all these concepts to audience - Aquaman still needs to be established as ruling his underwater kingdom, you have to establish all that stuff about Wonder Woman's realm, you're gonna have to establish Batman's new Gotham now. All these things are going to have to be functioning at some level in Superman vs. Batman, to establish that there is a universe of heroes out there.

People really don't have any expectations for the shit they watch maybe, but I do. I want character moments and storylines to be earned. When you have to rush to fit all these plot lines in a 2 and a half hour movie, you get shit like Spiderman 3.

And it's not like my concern is unwarranted. Man of Steel was really a problematic movie on so many levels. It wasn't as bad as some of the other Superman movies we've had in the years, but this is the start of a cinematic universe. It's dour, humourless stuff most of the time, lacks the charm of how Marvel established things. And as I said, I prefer DC comics.

The difference between how Marvel and DC are handling things is that Marvel clearly respects cinema. They understand what needs to happen in film for comic book characters and universes to work, for the audience to be able to suspend their disbelief. I mean we're talking about the director of 300 sequel Noam Murro as a potential director and Zack Snyder already in the mix from before? DC keeps picking style over substance wonks.

I hope they get their shit together, but I'm sorry man the concerns people have today are just as relevant now as they were the second they were said. Nothing has changed, and you have not established anything as changing since they started being concerns.

I think Jason Momoa looks pretty rad in this interpretation of AQUAMAN, but my concern remains I wish they would slow things down and give us a Wonder Woman movie first, and a Batman movie at least and then go the rest of the stuff.

Right now as cool as this outfit looks (and to their credit, the Superman outfit remains very well done), it's not the costumes that concern me.



They're not relevant, that's why I'm clowning your coughing them up.

They remain relevant, that's why they keep being brought up and why you're so unsurprised that they are. That you think you're "clowning" anyone made me smile though, thanks brosef :D
 

ReiGun

Member
I'm all for this as long as they ignore the comics as much as possible. Don't give him a hook hand at any point, or a water hand because both were dumb, everyone knows it. Aquaman fans too, they're just in denial. Just say one of his powers is the ability to control all forms of liquid (blood bending anyone?) some liquids are easier than others and that because he lives under the sea (spongebob square pants) he has super strength and crazy durability. There you go, feel free to use any variation of his origin story (because Americans love the trope of an outsider being heir to a throne of a far away place and despite not knowing shit about the politics or people of said place, that person is by far the best choice to rule and understand the people because).

Don't mention shit about talking to/psychically linked to (aka talking to) sea life.
I was with you till the end. For better or worse, his telepathic connection to sea life is Aquaman's most famous ability. No way it gets left out. Used sparingly, maybe. But not totally cut.
 

Cipherr

Member
Looks Meh, but the scale/tattoos are awesome.

Doesn't matter though, Momoa was on SG:Atlantis and gaters are gonna gate baby. So Ill support this movie regardless.

The exact same shit could have been said about Thor.

Thank you. Tired of people hating on comic movies because according to the comics "theres no story to tell" or "but its not interesting at all". We have already seen comic movies do well and be good films despite that. Folks need to stop trotting out that tired nonsense.

He looks fucking.

Why is this so hilarious
 

MattKeil

BIGTIME TV MOGUL #2
Says you. I disagree and would rather rewatch MoS than any of those movies any day of the week, unless I needed some sleep then I'd put on Thor.

I'm not saying the movies you listed are masterpieces, but Man of Steel is one of the worst films I've ever seen in a theater. There's not a single good choice in the whole thing, and it actually made me appreciate Superman Returns more. And I hated Superman Returns.

The leaked story info about Batman v. Superman indicates that they're using the flaws of Man of Steel as a jumping off point for the main conflict in BvS, so the fact that they have recognized the mistakes of MoS makes me much more hopeful for the sequel. Honestly, the writing talent that Ben Affleck's involvement was able to bring to bear on BvS is worth all the rancor from the internet regarding Batfleck. Even if he's just an okay Batman, his attachment to the DCCU project is a tremendous positive.
 
I'm not saying the movies you listed are masterpieces, but Man of Steel is one of the worst films I've ever seen in a theater. There's not a single good choice in the whole thing, and it actually made me appreciate Superman Returns more. And I hated Superman Returns.

The leaked story info about Batman v. Superman indicates that they're using the flaws of Man of Steel as a jumping off point for the main conflict in BvS, so the fact that they have recognized the mistakes of MoS makes me much more hopeful for the sequel. Honestly, the writing talent that Ben Affleck's involvement was able to bring to bear on BvS is worth all the rancor from the internet regarding Batfleck. Even if he's just an okay Batman, his attachment to the DCCU project is a tremendous positive.

if you hated Man of Steel that much then you are probably not going to like BvS or Justice League. Sorry you feel that way. Not sure what else to say. Good luck in your future endeavors.


I do have to admit I'm a little concerned if they are really looking at the director of 300: Rise of an Empire for this. They should see if the guy who did Yes Man is available, or better yet the guy who directed Terminator Genysis.
 
The exact same shit could have been said about Thor. Thor is based on norse mythology and all sorts of lame associated shit has to be set up to make the universe make sense. More awful comic stories related to Thor than good ones. But there's a few good ones, same with Aquaman.

those thor movies are still trash and the most skippable ones in the series tho
 

Cipherr

Member
Man of Steel was awful. But so was Ironman 3. A bad film in a "Universe" doesn't mean the rest will be bad. Jesus....
KuGsj.gif
KuGsj.gif
 
I'm not saying the movies you listed are masterpieces, but Man of Steel is one of the worst films I've ever seen in a theater. There's not a single good choice in the whole thing, and it actually made me appreciate Superman Returns more. And I hated Superman Returns.

The leaked story info about Batman v. Superman indicates that they're using the flaws of Man of Steel as a jumping off point for the main conflict in BvS, so the fact that they have recognized the mistakes of MoS makes me much more hopeful for the sequel. Honestly, the writing talent that Ben Affleck's involvement was able to bring to bear on BvS is worth all the rancor from the internet regarding Batfleck. Even if he's just an okay Batman, his attachment to the DCCU project is a tremendous positive.

HOLY SHIT

I think I've read it all now.

Really?

One of the worst you've ever seen? NOTHING worked?

Were you born 10 years ago?

Jesus.
 
He looks like Kahl Drago dressed up for a Halloween party.

Eh, not bad. Still not sure how they're gonna incorporate this. We going full-on fantasy? Or is he also a space alien descendant?
 
Oh damn, I was never a fan of bearded Aquaman but this just makes so much sense when you think about it. Guy lives underwater and never shaves so o/c he would have flowing locks and a Gandalf beard.
 
Why should fucking AQUAMAN be "carefully introduced" via a two hour film of his own?

There's nothing about fuckin Aquaman (or any superhero, really) that necessitates two hours of introduction for an audience to roll with it.

Uh... Atlantis, maybe?

Flash and Cyborg can probably be introduced just fine via cameos, their origins are pretty straightforward, but Aquaman and WW have entire fantastical sub-universes associated with them which have zero conceptual relation to anything we saw in MoS. It's like if Marvel had attempted to introduce Thor as a supporting character in IM2 instead of Black Widow, or if Rocket Raccoon and Groot... no, that's going too far, let's just say Gamora and Drax had been introduced as supporting characters in TWS.

...and I don't know what cut of MoS you saw, but it most certainly did not give us a universe where the existence of an entire superpowered undersea civilization could be played as a mundane occurrence necessitating minimal exposition.
 

obin_gam

Member
I like the design. Tattoos and colorscheme.

Green and yellow would have never worked. Those who think that are delusional.
 
Even if you think it sucks, MoS barely outperform it.

MoS also didn't have the Marvel hype train behind it. So that speaks volumes to how much better MoS is than Thor.

Thor: TDA is like the J.Cole of superhero movies. Decidedly average, middle class, safe and content on being seen as such.
 

Wiktor

Member
Look badass. Like he climbed from depths of ocean to wreak havoc on Earth.
Aquaman is percieved as utter joke, so it's good they are making him into a monster in the movie.
 

T'Zariah

Banned
I know MoS is a divisive movie and all, but if you legitimately believe MoS deserves to be listed as one of the worst movies of all time, that's when any opinion you have on movies in general should never EVER be taken seriously.
 

Game4life

Banned
those thor movies are still trash and the most skippable ones in the series tho

You know I agree with you they are trash but It still gave us a strong enough idea of Thor's personality and his world and therefore I could appreciate his involvment in Avengers a bit more. Amirox worry is that there are so many new people the movie has to introduce that it many end up not doing justice to any of the characters. That would be a travesty. Avengers had all the heroes introduced before hand in some good and some bad movies and therefore was able to directly focus on just the chemistry of the team throughout the movie. That may not be the case here. I just hope they do not short change Wonder Woman's iconic movie entry. I have waited for so long to see her done well on the big screen. Fingers crossed.
 

BLACKLAC

Member
MoS also didn't have the Marvel hype train behind it. So that speaks volumes to how much better MoS is than Thor.

Thor: TDA is like the J.Cole of superhero movies. Decidedly average, middle class, safe and content on being seen as such.

MoS had the Nolan trilogy hype behind it.
 

Amir0x

Banned
I see what you're saying but honestly I don't think I can fault them.

They may not have the time to build up lesser known characters first, not with Marvel in full swing and in the middle of its arc. They got caught sleeping during phase 1. The genre isn't going anywhere but these next few years may be peak in terms of box-office.

I still hope. I mean, I hope that somehow they find a way to adequately introduce all these characters and worlds in one 2 and a half hour movie.

I just cannot figure out how they're going to do that convincingly. I've seen a lot of movies in my day, and it's hard for any director to pull together so many disparate concepts in a coherent fashion. This is a tall order. Unless most of the characters are just in the movie for a quick cameo other than Superman vs. Batman, I don't know how they're going to do it.

It seems at least Wonder Woman has a major role in the film though based on the trifecta poster?

You dont need to be the worlds best actor to pull of Batman. Need a competent script, look and acting skills . Affleck has the look and acting skills good enough to be Batman. Christian Bale is supposed to be a very great actor yet turned out a horrible batman performance in my opinion. Again he was probably let down by the director and the script more than anything.

No I agree. I mean, but is the goal to merely have a passable, C grade Batman or a version of Batman that actually does it justice? Bale is a great actor, but much of the time he was phoning in his Batman performance. So that is Bale's fault, and maybe Batman wasn't the role for him. But it doesn't mean we just settle for a mediocre actor. Ben Affleck is a good director, but actor... man. This is supposed to be hard boiled Batman judging by the foundational comics inspiring the storyline, and can you really buy Affleck doing that well?

I just wish they picked a more grizzled actor for the role, a more Clint Eastwood tough type (not in terms of age, but toughness).

those thor movies are still trash and the most skippable ones in the series tho

I mean other people really like them, and they're not poorly received. I'm not a big fan, but again I don't really like Marvel comics. But I did appreciate how they created context for the universe being established throughout the films, though. I think it adds value to what they were going for, because you get all this context and it gives dimensionality to their storyline.

Marvel Cinematic Universe fans know I'm not blind fan of those films, I have problems with a lot of them. But in terms of handling the overall structure of the cinematic universe, they're being patient with it and I do think that is paying off dividends. To the point they are able to adequately tie their TV shows in with it too now, which is really impressive synchronizing.
 

3N16MA

Banned
The exact same shit could have been said about Thor. Thor is based on norse mythology and all sorts of lame associated shit has to be set up to make the universe make sense. More awful comic stories related to Thor than good ones. But there's a few good ones, same with Aquaman.

But if you don't have the confidence in your characters to think it's worth establishing real narrative weight with them, that's an even bigger problem. The point is to make these characters worth a damn in the cinematic universe. That's what Marvel keeps doing, because they're taking their time. Honestly few people gave a shit about Guardians of the Galaxy before the films, just look out how popular they were. And now people are interested. If you do it right, you can make concepts that aren't particularly compelling on paper work well for film.

It's a problem making a film to introduce all these concepts to audience - Aquaman still needs to be established as ruling his underwater kingdom, you have to establish all that stuff about Wonder Woman's realm, you're gonna have to establish Batman's new Gotham now. All these things are going to have to be functioning at some level in Superman vs. Batman, to establish that there is a universe of heroes out there.

People really don't have any expectations for the shit they watch maybe, but I do. I want character moments and storylines to be earned. When you have to rush to fit all these plot lines in a 2 and a half hour movie, you get shit like Spiderman 3.

And it's not like my concern is unwarranted. Man of Steel was really a problematic movie on so many levels. It wasn't as bad as some of the other Superman movies we've had in the years, but this is the start of a cinematic universe. It's dour, humourless stuff most of the time, lacks the charm of how Marvel established things. And as I said, I prefer DC comics.

The difference between how Marvel and DC are handling things is that Marvel clearly respects cinema. They understand what needs to happen in film for comic book characters and universes to work, for the audience to be able to suspend their disbelief. I mean we're talking about the director of 300 sequel Noam Murro as a potential director and Zack Snyder already in the mix from before? DC keeps picking style over substance wonks.

I hope they get their shit together, but I'm sorry man the concerns people have today are just as relevant now as they were the second they were said. Nothing has changed, and you have not established anything as changing since they started being concerns.

I think Jason Momoa looks pretty rad in this interpretation of AQUAMAN, but my concern remains I wish they would slow things down and give us a Wonder Woman movie first, and a Batman movie at least and then go the rest of the stuff.

Right now as cool as this outfit looks (and to their credit, the Superman outfit remains very well done), it's not the costumes that concern me.





They remain relevant, that's why they keep being brought up and why you're so unsurprised that they are. That you think you're "clowning" anyone made me smile though, thanks brosef :D

As of right now we have no clue how big or small of a role Wonder Woman or Aquaman will play in BvS. For all we know the film could largely deal with Batman and establish him since there is no need for his origin story.

Wonder Woman will get a solo film before JL which means three characters (Superman, Wonder Woman, and Batman) will get major screen time before JL. The only change that could have been made was moving up Aquaman to 2017 and pushing JL to 2018.
 
Khal Drogo becomes King of Atlantis and suddenly everybody's the biggest Aquaman fan ever
Thanks Snyder! There shall be a Feast Of Crows for the nearly the whole world

Give him Water-bender powers via Atlantean technology and we're good to go
 

a916

Member
Uh... Atlantis, maybe?

Flash and Cyborg can probably be introduced just fine via cameos, their origins are pretty straightforward, but Aquaman and WW have entire fantastical sub-universes associated with them which have zero conceptual relation to anything we saw in MoS. It's like if Marvel had attempted to introduce Thor as a supporting character in IM2 instead of Black Widow, or if Rocket Raccoon and Groot... no, that's going too far, let's just say Gamora and Drax had been introduced as supporting characters in TWS.

...and I don't know what cut of MoS you saw, but it most certainly did not give us a universe where the existence of an entire superpowered undersea civilization could be played as a mundane occurrence necessitating minimal exposition.

You could just as well say, Gamora, Drax, Groot, and Raccoon all had about 3 lines of their introduction and what they are or what their motives are... and that film well even in an enesemble movie where the clear focus was on one Starlord.
 
The exact same shit could have been said about Thor.

And turns out Thor still hasn't gotten a story worth a full movie, and yet, there's four hours of Thor movies that are just fucking sitting there.

Nothing about Thor in "The Avengers" couldn't have been gleaned from The Avengers. Hell, in hindsight, one could make the argument that it'd have been a much better bet to take Thor's solo movie slot and given it to Black Widow instead.

I'm cutting most of the rest of your long-winded shit because (weird concepts about Marvel's "respect for cinema" aside) it's basically just saying the same thing over and over again regarding "how things have to be done" and I just don't agree. These aren't obscure characters. There are films that come out EVERY MONTH featuring giant ensembles full of people you have NO CONCEPT OF until they're on the screen, and somehow you manage to roll with it, you can follow their story as it unfolds.

Nobody argues that The Grand Budapest Hotel should have had three movies of set-up so we can get an idea of how Gustav, Harvey Keitel, and Bill Murray's characters all came to be where they were when Zero first got a job.

You trying to tell me that the reason that was done was because Wes Anderson is somehow not CONFIDENT ENOUGH in his characters to give them full movies where they, say, wander around a backlot shouting bad shakespeare at giant fire-breathing tin cans? You telling me that somehow AQUAMAN is a complicated enough character that audiences need a two hour primer to get into him before he's introduced as a supporting character in a Superman/Batman movie?

Really?

They remain relevant, that's why they keep being brought up and why you're so unsurprised that they are. That you think you're "clowning" anyone made me smile though, thanks brosef :D

They're brought up because the people bringing them up lack the imagination to concieve of a world in which something could possibly happen that they weren't able to predict from the comfort of an armchair molded perfectly to the dilettante dimples of their pontificating ass.

There's more than enough support for the idea that audiences are sophisticated enough to accept and understand what an Aquaman is in 10 minutes of story, and that you don't NEED to run 6 to 7 hours of setup for a film in which multiple superheroes are going to exist.

Hell, MARVEL ITSELF just proved this point last summer. Very successfully, I might add.

At least we made it about 3 pages before this dumbass Marvel vs DC taint started skidmarking the conversation.
 

a916

Member
I know MoS is a divisive movie and all, but if you legitimately believe MoS deserves to be listed as one of the worst movies of all time, that's when any opinion you have on movies in general should never EVER be taken seriously.

Lol, this right here. So true.
 
Woah....I like the look. I wish they could have gotten the blonde hair to work due to it being such a huge point of controversy for the character. But I can work with this....Momoa looks like a friggin badass Neptune
 
At this stage they should really go with having an age old rivalry between Theymescryia and Atlantis since both representatives seem to be sporting ancient combat gear and the whole gladiator look
 

Amir0x

Banned
As of right now we have no clue how big or small of a role Wonder Woman or Aquaman will play in BvS. For all we know the film could largely deal with Batman and establish him since there is no need for his origin story.

Wonder Woman will get a solo film before JL which means three characters (Superman, Wonder Woman, and Batman) will get major screen time before JL. The only change that could have been made was moving up Aquaman to 2017 and pushing JL to 2018.

It seems from posters at least Wonder Woman also has a big role, they've been discussing her a lot and she's in the few promotional items we've got. I think she at least has a decent sized role. So probably Gotham, Themyscira and Metropolis have to be in the film at least I'd wager. I'm not sure they have to show Aquaman's abode though, probably get away with not touching that. But I mean given the way the world reacted to Superman, it's going to be curious to see how they justify these heroes coming out of nowhere in this movie in plot terms.

Since they also seem to be making a big pomp over Jason Momoa's character design, I bet his roles is not insubstantial though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom