First Look at Jason Momoa as AQUAMAN

Status
Not open for further replies.
He looks awesome.


Seeing these back to back lol

6dy5R2x.gif
 

Parallax

best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
what interpretation of Luthor are they even going for there. I can't wait to see how Eisenberg plays that

i wonder if they will go with alexander luthor from earth 3, but villainous. are there any shots of what eisenberg is supposed to look like?
 

Toxi

Banned
10 years ago we won't be having this conversation too. Love that Marvel have kickstated a justice league movie with aquaman =)
Crazy how 10 years ago, the only big superhero movie property people was Spider-Man (maybe X-men if you're generous). Things really turned around with Batman Begins and Iron-Man.
 

BLACKLAC

Member
Unite the 7 is the final tagline? Who else is going to be in this movie confirmed so far? Man that's a lot of leg work.

I mean it's not that you can't have a movie with a large ensemble cast work well. But in order to have your audience suspend disbelief, it's nice to ease them into major concepts to give them time to breathe. Comic books inherently have a ton of bonkers concepts to work through, it's the nature of the beast. Which is why it's better to give them room to breathe ;)

I mean if they are planning to introduce all this in this one movie, it's gonna be like 85% exposition. "And on yeah by the way there is a whole underwater society run by Aquaman, he controls fish in the sea. Oh shit and Wonder Woman definitely is an Amazon, there's political intrigue of all sorts there. She lives in an island nation hidden from rest of world." And if you really are gonna have the seven heroes in this one film, that's a whole shitload of stuff to introduce. Big concepts that just sound crazy to throw into the audiences face in one movie. You want the audience to slowly buy into this cinematic universe, it seems more like having a bucket of ice water poured on their head :p


I'm not sure how legit the rumors turned out to be (if they were debunked or not) but supposedly a lot of the back story was to be streamlined for an easier lift. Like Wonder Woman being a child of gods instead of born from clay (don't know if she's still Amazon in this) and Aquaman and Wonder Woman being related.
 

BadAss2961

Member
They were also introduced in a film with an inherently fantastical alien setting, in which the use of inherently fantastical alien characters requires minimal to no explanation.

A lot of people are talking as though BvS is set in the Incredibles universe, at least in terms of how unremarkable the existence of diverse superpowered beings should be. It's very weird, given how much some of them claim to love MoS, and yet they're apparently fine with the sequel being set in a radically different universe.
How hard is it to imagine or understand Superman being the domino effect that brings out all these superpowers?

Man of Steel establishes aliens coming to Earth from a planet god knows how far away that can fly into space, smash buildings, and shoot lasers from their eyes.
 
But that's why she needs to be in the League. An angry redhead water bender slicing through Parademons and drowning folks in midair is exactly the kind of hero we deserve.

Plus, it could force them to write Diana as being more peaceful to counter Mera aka how the fuck Diana is supposed to be written.

Word.

fixed that for you. image still has savage dragon and spawn anchoring it to its terrible origins

I can agree with that. Valiant puts out great shit.
 

guek

Banned
At least with Snyder navigating the DCCU ship, you know he's going to go over the top with the sea monsters Arthur has at his command. That's gonna be pretty rad.
 

Parallax

best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
Crazy how 10 years ago, the only big superhero movie property people was Spider-Man. Things really turned around with Batman Begins and Iron-Man.

i wasnt hot on the end result, but x2 was a thing at the time
 
what interpretation of Luthor are they even going for there? I can't wait to see how Eisenberg plays that

I'm thinking along the lines of the Secret Origins Luthor but crossed with Eisenberg's portrayal of Zuckerberg.

He'll be a fast talking, charismatic philanthropist to the people who secretly shows enormous anger and jealously of Superman.
 

guek

Banned
But that's why she needs to be in the League. An angry redhead water bender slicing through Parademons and drowning folks in midair is exactly the kind of hero we deserve.

Who wouldn't want to see something like this on the big screen?

WfV8COU.gif
 

FeD.nL

Member
I fucking love it. Civil War and BvS in the same year, coming out a month from eachother with Warcraft as the appetizer. If you would have told me this 10 years ago my head would explode. What a time to be alive.
 

Game4life

Banned
I'm not familiar enough with her other acting work, but she doesn't seem to have the appropriate muscular build. Still, I'm willing to let the jury rest on her... unless you start showing me youtube clips of her acting that leaves me concerned :p

What makes you worried about her? As I said, I'm not very familiar with her stuff. I know Jason's movies and TV stuff and he does strike me as a fine choice for Aquaman at least.

Mostly the bolded. She does not resemble a warrior type in any way and she is also terrible at acting from what I have seen of her so far. Wonder Woman is supposed to look intimidating physically and somehow I doubt I can take Gal Gadot seriously in such a role. Hey as long as she fights like this in the movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPlSdns_n1E and does the move at :0:36 I will be less disappointed at least :)
 
And turns out Thor still hasn't gotten a story worth a full movie, and yet, there's four hours of Thor movies that are just fucking sitting there.

Nothing about Thor in "The Avengers" couldn't have been gleaned from The Avengers. Hell, in hindsight, one could make the argument that it'd have been a much better bet to take Thor's solo movie slot and given it to Black Widow instead.

I'm cutting most of the rest of your long-winded shit because (weird concepts about Marvel's "respect for cinema" aside) it's basically just saying the same thing over and over again regarding "how things have to be done" and I just don't agree. These aren't obscure characters. There are films that come out EVERY MONTH featuring giant ensembles full of people you have NO CONCEPT OF until they're on the screen, and somehow you manage to roll with it, you can follow their story as it unfolds.

Nobody argues that The Grand Budapest Hotel should have had three movies of set-up so we can get an idea of how Gustav, Harvey Keitel, and Bill Murray's characters all came to be where they were when Zero first got a job.

You trying to tell me that the reason that was done was because Wes Anderson is somehow not CONFIDENT ENOUGH in his characters to give them full movies where they, say, wander around a backlot shouting bad shakespeare at giant fire-breathing tin cans? You telling me that somehow AQUAMAN is a complicated enough character that audiences need a two hour primer to get into him before he's introduced as a supporting character in a Superman/Batman movie?

Really?



They're brought up because the people bringing them up lack the imagination to concieve of a world in which something could possibly happen that they weren't able to predict from the comfort of an armchair molded perfectly to the dilettante dimples of their pontificating ass.

There's more than enough support for the idea that audiences are sophisticated enough to accept and understand what an Aquaman is in 10 minutes of story, and that you don't NEED to run 6 to 7 hours of setup for a film in which multiple superheroes are going to exist.

Hell, MARVEL ITSELF just proved this point last summer. Very successfully, I might add.

At least we made it about 3 pages before this dumbass Marvel vs DC taint started skidmarking the conversation.

Seriously, I think we get superhero movies now that 40 minutes of backstory is not needed. Guardians of the Galaxy as you said, did it right.
 

a916

Member
They were also introduced in a film with an inherently fantastical alien setting, in which the use of inherently fantastical alien characters requires minimal to no explanation.

A lot of people are talking as though BvS is set in the Incredibles universe, at least in terms of how unremarkable the existence of diverse superpowered beings should be. It's very weird, given how much some of them claim to love MoS, and yet they're apparently fine with the sequel being set in a radically different universe.

What? Where did you get this strange concept that the rest of the world is somehow reacting to the first super hero? No where did I get the feeling that people were like, omg, Aliens?! Super powered humans?! We barely get a reaction from Metropolis let alone the entire world's reaction to the existence of Clark (in the MOS movie). Explain to me exactly how this goes against the world they've set up?
 

Wiktor

Member
Even Marvel wants to move away from origin stories.
Black Panther will be introduced in Cap3, despite Wakanda being every bit as rich setting as anything Aquaman or WW has.But I'm sure somebody will argue that it's completely different thing and brilliant move by Marvel, while WW and Aquaman cameos are terrible way to introduce their characters.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
At least with Snyder navigating the DCCU ship, you know he's going to go over the top with the sea monsters Arthur has at his command. That's gonna be pretty rad.

You just know Topo will be around in his most recent incarnation.

wZgVzxC.jpg
 

Amir0x

Banned
Mostly the bolded. She does not resemble a warrior type in any way and she is also terrible at acting from what I have seen of her so far. Wonder Woman is supposed to look intimidating physically and somehow I doubt I can take Gal Gadot seriously in such a role. Hey as long as she fights like this in the movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPlSdns_n1E and does the move at :0:36 I will be less disappointed at least :)

Ah. I am the type of person who is more concerned with someone being able to act the part than look the part (provided it's not too crazy, like a fit hero suddenly being turned into a fat couch potato), but do we know how she looks now? Maybe she worked out and got into a more muscled form before shooting?

But now that you said she is a bad actress from what you've seen, that's more worrying. Honestly Jason Momoa isn't a great actor, but he can do his one role well.. which is usually a rage fueled warrior type, which Aquaman can be basically. Gal Gadot has to be completely in control at all times, totally in her skin, confident in her superiority, knowing she has no need of men. She has to basically chew up scenes with her authority. I wonder if she has it in her!

I'm thinking along the lines of the Secret Origins Luthor but crossed with Eisenberg's portrayal of Zuckerberg.

He'll be a fast talking, charismatic philanthropist to the people who secretly shows enormous anger and jealously of Superman.

That's what Eisenberg does well, so I suspect they have to go that route. Frankly I'm just glad we're not getting yet another attempt to be Gene Hackman's Luthor again :p

I'm not sure how legit the rumors turned out to be (if they were debunked or not) but supposedly a lot of the back story was to be streamlined for an easier lift. Like Wonder Woman being a child of gods instead of born from clay (don't know if she's still Amazon in this) and Aquaman and Wonder Woman being related.

Hmmm. That's a pretty nasty change if that did turn out to be true. I mean, how could Wonder Woman be related to Aquaman? Would Wonder Woman even be an Amazon? The unique role her society has on Diana is pretty important to her character. Themyscira is a society no man can set foot in. I don't think I'd like that specific change at all, because Wonder Woman's culture is especially important to who she is.

I'm sure it played a role but I'm not sure how much of an impact it made.

In general the trilogy did well OS but it never did as well as it's domestic pull.

Domestic: $1,189,849,975 (48.3%)
Overseas: $1,273,366,241 (51.7%)

The domestic total almost equaled the overseas total.

Thanks for the details. I had this image in my mind that the shooting impacted the third movie in an outsized fashion, I guess 'cause of all the articles I read about how that first weeks numbers greatly underperformed in the US.
 
Ehh, I don't see this as overdesigned. Not that many elements. Black and gold is a cool look.

When I think overdesigned, I think of Darksiders.
War-darksiders-artwork-character.jpg

I think its just the super complex full body tatoo design combined with the strap on his chest that makes it seem overdesigned to me. If it was just one or the other I would be fine with it.

You do realize the picture is in black and white, right?

Its not (at least entirely), since you can easily see that his face and his armor are not. I think theres tatoo work to make his chest seem grey which might be where you're getting the black and white vibes from. But yeah there's obviously a filter so I'll be optimistic that it'll be more colorful in the actual movie.
 
I really like it

And kudos to the person that made that popular fan rendering. He or she did a really good job and was pretty close to the real thing.
 

jett

D-Member
I didn't realize at first that he is shirtless. Is he gonna be caked in white paint or is that just a super desaturated picture?

It's exactly what I expected, anyway. Jason Momoa can't not look badass.
 
Any word on who they're casting for Neptune Perkins? Like, any rumors, or anything, or is it one of those big secrets they're holding until the movie comes out?

194761-195984-neptune-perkins.jpg

lmao that was corny.

i wonder if they're still pursuing jeff nichols for this. would be a really interesting move but also much better than the flunky who made 300 2.

what the fuck, Jeff Nichols on Aquaman? I mean, i'd watch it, but that'd be weird as hell
 

guek

Banned
My biggest concern for Gal Gadot outside of her acting (which I've never actually seen) is not just her build but her height. 5'10" doesn't really scream "amazon goddess" to me :-(

I wish we had someone closer to this

But let's be honest, that look would never get greenlit in Hollywood.
 
My biggest concern for Gal Gadot outside of her acting (which I've never actually seen) is not just her build but her height. 5'10" doesn't really scream "amazon goddess" to me :-(

I wish we had someone closer to this


But let's be honest, that look would never get greenlit in Hollywood.

High heels could probably get her to 6'2. At which point, she should be equal to most of those guys.

Maybe she could ask Robert for some tips.

3z4NLsP.jpg
 
Its not (at least entirely), since you can easily see that his face and his armor are not. I think theres tatoo work to make his chest seem grey which might be where you're getting the black and white vibes from. But yeah there's obviously a filter so I'll be optimistic that it'll be more colorful in the actual movie.

Yup, you were right. I just took another look at it. My mistake. The tattoos + filter threw me off. Hopefully some of the gold pops without the filter
 

odiin

My Apartment, or the 120 Screenings of Salo
My biggest concern for Gal Gadot outside of her acting (which I've never actually seen) is not just her build but her height. 5'10" doesn't really scream "amazon goddess" to me :-(

I wish we had someone closer to this


But let's be honest, that look would never get greenlit in Hollywood.

Good luck finding many actresses taller than that. I'm actually surprised she's that tall. 5'10'' is nothing to sneeze at for a woman.
 

FeD.nL

Member
Mostly the bolded. She does not resemble a warrior type in any way and she is also terrible at acting from what I have seen of her so far. Wonder Woman is supposed to look intimidating physically and somehow I doubt I can take Gal Gadot seriously in such a role. Hey as long as she fights like this in the movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPlSdns_n1E and does the move at :0:36 I will be less disappointed at least :)

nvm the pic.

I think she will surprise a lot of people. I trust Zack Snyder in directing a good strong female character on screen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom