First Look at Jason Momoa as AQUAMAN

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because the audience can totally relate to a Hugh Jackman running around onscreen in bright yellow spandex.
This is not a comic book. Movie goers want something believable. Snyder has said that much already. It is why Superman has the costume he has. It has to make sense to movie goers. What sense is there to be made with a wolverine in bright yellow spandex? The source material serves as a guide. Its not something they have to adhere to 100%. An Xmen movie that stayed 100% true to the source material in costume design would be mistaken for the Power Rangers.

If captain America can work , anything can work.
 
What? Where did you get this strange concept that the rest of the world is somehow reacting to the first super hero? No where did I get the feeling that people were like, omg, Aliens?! Super powered humans?! We barely get a reaction from Metropolis let alone the entire world's reaction to the existence of Clark (in the MOS movie). Explain to me exactly how this goes against the world they've set up?

Well, I don't think we saw the same movie, then. MoS was pretty meticulous about avoiding the suggestion of any fantastic elements not directly associated with Kryptonians and their technology. It was very much made as a "what if he existed in the real world" story.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
Because the audience can totally relate to a Hugh Jackman running around onscreen in bright yellow spandex.
This is not a comic book. Movie goers want something believable. Snyder has said that much already. It is why Superman has the costume he has. It has to make sense to movie goers. What sense is there to be made with a wolverine in bright yellow spandex? The source material serves as a guide. Its not something they have to adhere to 100%. An Xmen movie that stayed 100% true to the source material in costume design would be mistaken for the Power Rangers.

The costumes thing for X-Men always bugs me.

In the comic-books it makes sense because they live in a world of superheroes and use the bright colours to appear less dangerous than they are. But in the films, there are no superheroes. None of the X-Men patrol, none of them pro-actively stop crime. They only do anything when there's a Magneto size threat. They're effectively the realisation of the comic-books implication of a self-funded paramilitary force.

And as the prequel films have shown us, the idealism of the 1960s with the costumes was destroyed by shit like Vietnam, mutants dying etc. So in the original timeline they'd seen so much shit that dressing like a prat in spandex would be counterproductive. Post DOFP, I'd guess we'd get those colourful costumes back because they're idealistic again.
 

Ahasverus

Member
ITT people don't realize WB is one of the oldest studios in the bussiness and knows what the fuck they are doing more than they do.

Love the aesthetics, to hell with "relating", these are modern Gods, bring on the majestic imagery, it's about time.
 

Loxley

Member
No joke, that is more or less exactly how I was hoping he'd look. Fish motif + some Polynesian influence. Freaking awesome.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
You guys are really giving this your all!

How can he look like a Marvel character? He's not a white guy named Chris.

ZRvXGQ.gif
 
Yes, and Guardians of the Galaxy didn't need a solo Star Lord movie, solo Gamora movie, solo Drax movie and solo Groot & Rocket movie. Each of those characters just appeared in the movie and made a team.

Again: Inherently fantastic characters are easier to introduce in an inherently fantastic setting, which is why the GotG comparison doesn't wash.

This isn't that hard a concept to understand. No one asks why or how dragons exist in LotR or GoT, but if a film were to open with a dragon flying through modern-day Times Square, surely you'd want to know what it was doing there. Similarly, characters like Rocket and Groot would have required a hell of a lot more explanation had they been introduced in an earthbound setting.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
Again: Inherently fantastic characters are easier to introduce in an inherently fantastic setting, which is why the GotG comparison doesn't wash.

This isn't that hard a concept to understand. No one asks why or how dragons exist in LotR or GoT, but if a film were to open with a dragon flying through modern-day Times Square, surely you'd want to know what it was doing there. Similarly, characters like Rocket and Groot would have required a hell of a lot more explanation had they been introduced in an earthbound setting.

I think you're really underestimating the intelligence of the average cinema goer, who will roll with it. It's people online who seem to think this shit is more complex than 'there's Wonder Woman, she's an Amazon' as an introduction.
 

Vinci

Danish
Really wanting to see these outfits without the apparent muted filter on them, but they look really strong design-wise. Cautiously optimistic.

That said, if the Flash looks all depressed and muted like these have, I'm going to be a bit disappointed. He's really not that sort of character.
 
I am not liking the washed out colour scheme that all these DC promo shots seem to be going for. This reminds me a lot of that Wonder Woman shot that had more colour in it than they were letting you see.

Is DS/Warner anti-colour?

Otherwise the costume itself looks good.
 
Is Zach making a joke reference to GoT with "Unite The Seven", is there a DC Atlantis reference I'm missing there, or is he talking about the founding seven members of the Justice League?
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
Is Zach making a joke reference to GoT with "Unite The Seven", is there a DC Atlantis reference I'm missing there, or is he talking about the founding seven members of the Justice League?

Founding members.

1 - Superman
2 - Batman
3 - Wonder Woman
4 - Aquaman
5/6/7 - Flash/Green Lantern/Cyborg.
 

marrec

Banned
Aquaman looks great but I really can't get excited for a J. League movie. It feels hollow. My fav The Flash has been nailed by Gustin and he'll not be in the role. So the #1 reason I'd want to see a J. League movie is dashed against the rocks. Curse you DC and Warner.

(I'll still see it)
 

anaron

Member
I think you're really underestimating the intelligence of the average cinema goer, who will roll with it. It's people online who seem to think this shit is more complex than 'there's Wonder Woman, she's an Amazon' as an introduction.
or the fact that she, along with most of the justice league, are some of the most recognizable characters of all time.
 

Gonzalez

Banned
I see MarvelGAF has decided to derail this thread. Why don't you guys go back to making Marvel stealth threads *Cough*Neoxom*Cough*, and let the regular folk admire this one hell of a specimen that is playing Aquaman.
 

Mr_Zombie

Member
Again: Inherently fantastic characters are easier to introduce in an inherently fantastic setting, which is why the GotG comparison doesn't wash.

This isn't that hard a concept to understand. No one asks why or how dragons exist in LotR or GoT, but if a film were to open with a dragon flying through modern-day Times Square, surely you'd want to know what it was doing there. Similarly, characters like Rocket and Groot would have required a hell of a lot more explanation had they been introduced in an earthbound setting.

Then you can explain it within a scene or two. You definitely don't need a 2-hours movie for that.

The Matrix starts with Trinity doing some weird kickass shit and then teleporting via a telephone booth. Then, 30 minutes into the movie, Morpheus explains that the world we see is really a virtual reality feed to us by machines that harvest and treat humans as their energy source. The end. The audience get that and the movie is successful. The whole universe (the basics) and ideology of the Matrix was explained within 5-10 minutes.

Audience isn't stupid, at least not that much. And when you go to the cinema to see a movie that stars Superman - you know, the guy from another planet, who is inhumanly strong, can fly and can shoot laser beams out of his eyes - you have to be prepared for crazy characters and scenes out of this world.

There are a lot of movies, books and games that merge modern-day realistic settings with sci-fi or fantasy ones and they just throw you into the world, in the middle of some action, and explain the universe as you read/watch/play it. Why can't we expect the same from comic book hero movies? Why do we have to take it slow and dedicate solo movies to each character.

And I prefer the Superman vs Batman to establish the universe and characters of TJL and then have separate movies that focus solely on Wonder Woman, Aquaman, The Flash etc. where those characters are already established as existing in this world and serving as super heroes.

I think you're really underestimating the intelligence of the average cinema goer, who will roll with it. It's people online who seem to think this shit is more complex than 'there's Wonder Woman, she's an Amazon' as an introduction.

Exactly.
"Here's Wonder Woman - she's an Amazon warrior princess."
"Here's Aquaman - he's the Atlantean, ruler of Atlantis and oceans. He can do stuff with water and can talk to fishes."
"Here's Flash - he's a cop and is the fastest man on Earth."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom