WWE Fastlane 2015 |OT| Last Exit to WrestleMania

Status
Not open for further replies.

UberTag

Member
People getting worked up over "Roman fans vs. D.Brine fans" make my head hurt.
None of these people matter at all. They've all been booked like crap.

That being said, I think that debate has been overstated.
 

I'M FINISHED!

Um exCUSE me Sakurai but CLEARLY the best choice for Smash Bros would be my fav niche character HOWEVER you are clearly INCOMPETENT and
Yet, the WWE is making more money now than they have than at any other time aside from the very height of the Attitude Era boom.

I wonder how much money they would make if they stopped booking like the WWE and started booking like the WWF. Mainstream interest in sports entertainment is in the shitter. Maybe they should try doing professional wrestling again.
 
I wonder how much money they would make if they stopped booking like the WWE and started booking like the WWF. Mainstream interest in sports entertainment is in the shitter. Maybe they should try doing professional wrestling again.

It's a risk they might not be able to take. They have been banking on the one audience that has been a constant throughout their existence (kids). Trying to ditch that and go after young adults with an "edgier" show might (and in my opinion would) blow up in their faces.
 

Ithil

Member
Yet, the WWE is making more money now than they have than at any other time aside from the very height of the Attitude Era boom.

Actually they lost more money in the last year than they have since the mid 90s slump. That's with extreme cost cutting and downsizing of their workforce.
 

UberTag

Member
I wonder how much money they would make if they stopped booking like the WWE and started booking like the WWF. Mainstream interest in sports entertainment is in the shitter. Maybe they should try doing professional wrestling again.
Why would Vince do something different? Clearly it is the fans who are wrong.

So what you guys think about the Joe situation?
There's not much of a situation. He's leaving a company that is irrelevant and can now work for promotions that are relevant and make a lot of money. Good for him.
 

I'M FINISHED!

Um exCUSE me Sakurai but CLEARLY the best choice for Smash Bros would be my fav niche character HOWEVER you are clearly INCOMPETENT and
It's a risk they might not be able to take. They have been banking on the one audience that has been a constant throughout their existence (kids). Trying to ditch that and go after young adults with an "edgier" show might (and in my opinion would) blow up in their faces.

It doesn't need to be edgier, it just needs to be booked properly. Kids loved the Rock 'n' Wrestling era and it was booked like a wrestling show. Sure, it was flashier, but it was still classic professional wrestling booking.
 

RBH

Member
I honestly have more of an issue with Ziggler getting jobbed out to Kane and Big Show than I do with the whole Reigns/Bryan situation.

The booking of Ambrose also warrants more attention.
 

MC Safety

Member
It is hard to say what would happen if they booked a wrestling show like they did in the past if they never try.

Well, look at the comic industry. For years, it's been actively catering to its existing, adult audience to the exclusion of new readers. It's become the snake eating its own tail and now has to resort to an endless parade of "shock value" moments to temporarily boost sales.

The Attitude era was a punctuated shift in tone, necessary to compete with WCW. It's not a long-term strategy, and it's certainly not conducive to cultivating a younger audience.
 
Actually they lost more money in the last year than they have since the mid 90s slump. That's with extreme cost cutting and downsizing of their workforce.

I meant making as in money in. Yeah, they're losing money 'cause of the costs of the Network and all, but the actual cash flowing in over the past 4 or 5 years is more than at any time than the 00-01 peak.
 
I honestly have more of an issue with Ziggler getting jobbed out to Kane and Big Show than I do with the whole Reigns/Bryan situation.

The booking of Ambrose also warrants more attention.
And Bray Wyatt. They're pushing him, but only to likely job to a dude who wrestles once a fucking year. What a silly company.
 

UberTag

Member
I honestly have more of an issue with Ziggler getting jobbed out to Kane and Big Show than I do with the whole Reigns/Bryan situation.

The booking of Ambrose also warrants more attention.
Ziggler losing in the opening match doesn't matter all that much. It was a nothing contest barely fit for an episode of Smackdown. They're still pushing Big Show's KO punch so having him sell it makes sense. His push can at least be rehabilitated somewhat if they go back to that D.Brine-Ziggler match they talked about after the Rumble and give them 12-15 minutes to dance at Mania.

As for Ambrose, he's 0-8 as a singles wrestler on PPV through little fault of his own. He's simply not a guy they plan to elevate. Best hope for him is a heel turn and a feud with Reigns after he wins the title. (Although he would still lose those matches.)
 

Bowser

Member
I honestly don't know where they go with Bray/Taker. I don't think you can have Taker job 2 Manias in a row, but Bray losing back to back Manias, even against legends, isn't helping him whatsoever. What major feud has Bray won besides Bryan (and we all know WWE couldn't care less about booking Bryan strongly)?
 
I honestly don't know where they go with Bray/Taker. I don't think you can have Taker job 2 Manias in a row, but Bray losing back to back Manias, even against legends, isn't helping him whatsoever. What major feud has Bray won besides Bryan (and we all know WWE couldn't care less about booking Bryan strongly)?
He's floating around the same abyss as dean Ambrose.

Seth Rollins is actually being treated and pushed fairly well.
 

Bowser

Member
He's floating around the same abyss as dean Ambrose.

Seth Rollins is actually being treated and pushed fairly well.

Oh yeah, I guess he won the Ambrose feud, although they've booked Ambrose like dog shit for a solid 9 months so that feud didn't really matter all that much.

I can't believe how we never got a real resolution to Seth betraying his brothers and joining the Authority. Botched the fuck out of that storyline too.
 
It's a risk they might not be able to take. They have been banking on the one audience that has been a constant throughout their existence (kids). Trying to ditch that and go after young adults with an "edgier" show might (and in my opinion would) blow up in their faces.

Their audience has been and continues to be mostly men in their 30's
 

Vestal

Junior Member
I honestly don't know where they go with Bray/Taker. I don't think you can have Taker job 2 Manias in a row, but Bray losing back to back Manias, even against legends, isn't helping him whatsoever. What major feud has Bray won besides Bryan (and we all know WWE couldn't care less about booking Bryan strongly)?

It can work if the match is booked correctly. You can book a match were someone losses but comes out the winner, but I just don't know if Taker has the kind of match he had with Jeff Hardy back in the day left in him..

Although, I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt, since last Mania the fucker had a concussion.
 
LAW is just terrible.
I couldn't sit through it, especially after that awful show. Ambrose desrves better. Brah was on fire late last summer. Then they killed his momentum after the movie. I buy him going into psychotic mode a bigger threat to Lesnar than a Roman Reigns dressed up in Columbine gear.
 
Ambrose has it. Money in the ring and on the mic. Reigns is getting pushed soley for his look. They book him as this monster powerhouse dude and Ambrose is the same height as him.
 

v0yce

Member
Ambrose has it. Money in the ring and on the mic. Reigns is getting pushed soley for his look. They book him as this monster powerhouse dude and Ambrose is the same height as him.

Yeah, that's a problem. Dude is supposed to be a powerhouse but doesn't seem to be that strong in reality and struggles with some power moves.

I mean Rollins throwing guys into the corner looks as strong/stronger than Reigns.

MRLS.gif
 
Yeah, that's a problem. Dude is supposed to be a powerhouse but doesn't seem to be that strong in reality and struggles with some power moves.

I mean Rollins throwing guys into the corner looks as strong/stronger than Reigns.

MRLS.gif
Precisely. He was the weakest member of the shield by far, and that was obvious from the start. I'm talking in terms of mic/promo work. Not physical strength.
 
Lesnar vs. Reigns is going to get massively shit on at WM.
Deservedly so. Hopefully it happens. I imagine there will be much orchestration to get things right beforehand, so I wouldn't be shocked if it wasn't completely abysmal, but Reigns isn't good, and I don't think Brock can carry a match with someone like Roman.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
HORRIBLE moment just now. Fucking stupid ass shit. Reigns doesn't deserve this spot, and it is why I and a lot of people will continue to boo the living shit out of this guy and the direction this company is going.

That is salt.

If Brock is sticking around then there isn't even a need to get the title off of him.

Would people be more surprised if Brock won the ME then him winning against Taker last year? Because people are acting like its a done deal.

I honestly would not be surprised if Lesnar stays, destroys Reigns, destroys Bryan, and destroys Orton en route to WM 32. You would have Lesnar break Punk's record for title reign, and it would break the crowd's mind if Lesnar won again.

You're right. He's just beating all the top guys and being in the main event to beat the biggest monster of the past decade to be the #2 guy.

You do mean Daniel Bryan, right? Because I'm sure Bryan is the one who has beaten Cena, HHH, Orton, Batista, Sheamus clean, stopped the Shield's dominance during their heel run, and had he beaten Lesnar & Reigns - would basically have no one left to face in WWE. (It's the reason they have to hold off on Bryan's run; they need to build more opponents for him)

Hasn't Cena's run seen WWE's television ratings plummet from the heights of the attitude and rock 'n' wrestling eras? And it isn't that impressive that the most protected wrestler in the history of modern wrestling sells the most merchandise when he has more merchandise than every other WWE "Superstar". And yes, it is the nature of Vince's ego to continue marching his creation to further irrelevancy by spinning crowd reactions and booking in ways that are contrary to the companies most successful periods.

TV ratings for individual shows are down 30+% as a whole. Agent Carter is doing 1.8s, for example.

teamjacobheader.png


That's what you guys basically are. You're Twilight fans. Take some time and reflect on that.

...legit shook.
 

Vestal

Junior Member
That is salt.



I honestly would not be surprised if Lesnar stays, destroys Reigns, destroys Bryan, and destroys Orton en route to WM 32. You would have Lesnar break Punk's record for title reign, and it would break the crowd's mind if Lesnar won again.
.

Salt shit is getting old.

I would love for Lesnar to destroy everyone in his path. That SOB is that entertaining!
 

Teeth

Member
Has Reigns ever used the full guard ground 'n pound elbows or Matt Hughes arm bar power bomb moves before?

With the superman punch, he should just go full MMA arsenal and make that his schtick. It would at least set him more apart from the standard roster and give him a bunch more moves to work with that look 'strong'.

The GnP looked good in particular. Like he actually cared.
 
I think the threat of/or actual cash in of the MITB by Seth Rollins will quell any sort of negative reaction at the end of the match.

But I still dont want Reigns to be the guy that beats Lesnar.

Lesnar's dominance is so special. Everything's been perfect about it, and to give it to Reigns is just gross.

Lesnar getting cashed in on is perfect. But having Reigns win and then lose is just awful, and will get shit on, because it's not about the title, it's about who gets to face and maybe beat Lesnar.

It's like the closest thing to Taker's streak we have now-- something built specially well over a good period of time that should have a sensible payoff. Giving that to Roman is never going to come off as genuine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom