Faced off in new 52 or before that? Cause they have faced off before that. She's beat him up before as Oracle.Honestly, I'm surprised that Babs and Joker haven't really faced off against each other again. Has potential to be a powerful story.
But in this story the characters don't react like the faux Batgirl is crazy and completely disgusting for dressing like Batgirl. I don't really think that was the sole point either.
Then when you consider that the book has a trans character who isn't a joke and isn't negative I think it's more likely it was innocent and not transphobic.
Has Spider-Man ever been crying on a cover? It would surprise me if he hasn't in some form, Peter cries more than basically every other male superhero.
It is a variant cover for a comic that likely won't reach a significant amount of people. The attention they're giving it will likely garner more than it would otherwise.So, there's apparently a Change.org petition going around to have the cover pulled. Does anyone think we're we gonna have a Milo Manara situation happen?
Has Spider-Man ever been crying on a cover? It would surprise me if he hasn't in some form, Peter cries more than basically every other male superhero.
Has Spider-Man ever been crying on a cover? It would surprise me if he hasn't in some form, Peter cries more than basically every other male superhero.
So, there's apparently a Change.org petition going around to have the cover pulled. Does anyone think we're we gonna have a Milo Manara situation happen?
Faced off in new 52 or before that? Cause they have faced off before that. She's beat him up before as Oracle.
bruce has constantly faced the result of his rape in his son though. dick was distant from tarantula despite her thinking there was something there between them.
She was sexually assaulted by Joker?
Yeah, I can see why people are unhappy
Has Spider-Man ever been crying on a cover? It would surprise me if he hasn't in some form, Peter cries more than basically every other male superhero.
Its a call back to the fucked up shit that happened in The Killing Joke. It makes perfect sense for Batgirl to be scared when the Joker has a gun to her head.
But Batman has never been in a similar situation to Barbara...his traumatic event was when he was a child, and his whole character is living through that. I can hardly think of any male heroes who have similar relationships with popular villains, mainly because they were already heroes before they met same villains.
Besides, not everyone has to be a emotionless baddy beating machine. Vulnerabilities and fears don't make someone weaker
They wouldn't because Batman isn't the same as Batgirl. Babs isn't like Bruce Wayne. She isn't a stone cold badass and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. She is still a hero.
If Wonder Woman was in this position then it'd be super weird.
For example.
And your proof is?Well doesn't that kinda goes with what I was saying, for me this doesn't have anything to do with barbara's history but the fact that they would be less likely to show a male hero in such a weak position(fear, tears) on the cover.
Well doesn't that kinda goes with what I was saying, for me this doesn't have anything to do with barbara's history but the fact that they would be less likely to show a male hero in such a weak position(fear, tears) on the cover.
Again, not in a way that depowers/emasculates him, which is the difference. The Dick one is a great example though, especially in terms of male rape, which (aside from comedic/male-male situations) is seldom brought up
Well doesn't that kinda goes with what I was saying, for me this doesn't have anything to do with barbara's history but the fact that they would be less likely to show a male hero in such a weak position(fear, tears) on the cover.
how is raising the son that reminds you of your rape not emasculation?
Instead of speaking for me and others, why not just be thoughtfully interested in perspectives different than your own?your post history on these type of threads is a good example too,i love the "Holier-than-thou" attitude some of you have on this forum
yeah..whe know..we are ignorant ,etc etc
Beat him up is more of exaggeration, but she put up a decent fight despite being in a wheel chair.UGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I was thinking New 52, but honestly I haven't read that story.
And your proof is?
Instead of speaking for me and others, why not just be thoughtfully interested in perspectives different than your own?
I appreciate the posts in here pointing out Batgirl and Joker's history, which informs the cover's intent. I don't understand the people who are just like "lol sjws being offended at everything" when they could at least use the opportunity to learn more, even if they don't agree.
You know what DOES really bother me about this cover, and a lot of the Killing Joke references?
Joker never shot Batgirl.
He shot a Barbara Gordon who had already retired from the superhero life some time ago.
I think it's a shitty thing to do to put her in the costume and reference TKJ. That's not the Babs he shot. That Babs wouldn't have let it happen. And even if she did the costume represents you as somethiing more than yourself. It is an aegis against your fears as a civilian. If they HAD to make her Batgirl again (they shouldn't have), I would have prefered they explore that idea than the "Oh I must get over this trauma!" bullshit.
Umm, bruce has had plenty of trauma too.
People get too heated on both sides for a rational discussion to emerge.Instead of speaking for me and others, why not just be thoughtfully interested in perspectives different than your own?
Instead of speaking for me and others, why not just be thoughtfully interested in perspectives different than your own?
You two are cool. Keep being cool.
But in this story the characters don't react like the faux Batgirl is crazy and completely disgusting for dressing like Batgirl. I don't really think that was the sole point either.
Then when you consider that the book has a trans character who isn't a joke and isn't negative I think it's more likely it was innocent and not transphobic.
Just a Joker theme for the month. He's not in the actual storyline.
Dissapointing. I guess they're saving their confrontation for an special event, though it's very easy to guess how it will turn out.Varients are generally unrelated to content.
Okay, I actually didn't know about that scene. So now I understand what you mean. However, I wonder how many of those outraged are actually thinking of that scene. That Barbara was paralyzed is always one of the most prominent things about the killing joke. To me it seems like the intent was to reference that, not what happened afterwards.http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5253/5530939261_7f3487d460_z.jpg (second to last panel is the start)
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ma7zhhTbsG1rryoefo1_500.jpg
The forced removal of clothing is sexual assault..
Dissapointing. I guess they're saving their confrontation for an special event, though it's very easy to guess how it will turn out.
I see. I don't read comics but I watched a lot of superheroes cartoons and movies throughout my life so I call myself a superhero enthusiast not an expert. But it seems the comics has a lot of sexual content (rape, radioactive semen). I wonder if they are rated for a specific audience? And sorry if this is a stupid question, but you know, there are a lot of kids worldwide playing with toys and stuff from these heroes (including myself while I was a kid).Yup
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5253/5530939261_7f3487d460_z.jpg (second to last panel is the start)
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ma7zhhTbsG1rryoefo1_500.jpg
The forced removal of clothing is sexual assault.
Why does she have to be in a weak position? Cause she's a girl? Because that's all I'm seeing from this argument. Why can't she just look pissed/agitated? Why does she have to be in tears? That's what equal representation in comics is. That's what "social crusaders" (people around here seem to love to hate) are asking for.
They've already confronted each other during Death of the FamilyDissapointing. I guess they're saving their confrontation for an special event, though it's very easy to guess how it will turn out.
Why does she have to be in a weak position? Cause she's a girl? Because that's all I'm seeing from this argument. Why can't she just look pissed/agitated? Why does she have to be in tears? That's what equal representation in comics is. That's what "social crusaders" (people around here seem to love to hate) are asking for.
Dissapointing. I guess they're saving their confrontation for an special event, though it's very easy to guess how it will turn out.
I am not sure if you are agreeing with me or not. She looks to be in weak position because it seems like she being held against her will on gun point and certainly hurting. And i just feel i am less likely to see a male superhero in the same position.
I don't imagine we'd ever see Batman with a terrified look in his face and a tear coming out of his eye no matter what situation Joker managed to put him in.
The fact that writers don't dedicate pages of content to that is the difference.
Why does she have to be in a weak position? Cause she's a girl? Because that's all I'm seeing from this argument. Why can't she just look pissed/agitated? Why does she have to be in tears? That's what equal representation in comics is. That's what "social crusaders" (people around here seem to love to hate) are asking for.
The fact that writers don't dedicate pages of content to that is the difference.
I don't imagine we'd ever see Batman with a terrified look in his face and a tear coming out of his eye no matter what situation Joker managed to put him in.
Because it happens to everyone regardless of gender? how is it equal representation if there are a whole bunch of subjects/topics/themes that you aren't allowed to have a women portray?
A lot of these characters - both male and female - are frozen in time in many respects with their traumatic origins defining them for an eternity (I'm looking at you Batman).Personally, I don't feel the cover, in a vacuum, is offensive. It's a reference to a previous story, and an iconic one that defined the character.
The problem, is that the events of the killing joke were allowed to define her, and unlike other, male heroes, she is continually characterized as being a victim.
You won't see that because Batman famously internalises his fear and rage. That's part and parcel of the Batman character.I don't imagine we'd ever see Batman with a terrified look in his face and a tear coming out of his eye no matter what situation Joker managed to put him in.
Personally, I don't feel the cover, in a vacuum, is offensive. It's a reference to a previous story, and an iconic one that defined the character.
The problem, is that the events of the killing joke were allowed to define her, and unlike other, male heroes, she is continually characterized as being a victim.
No, not because she is a girl. Because she is younger, less experienced, less driven and less emotionally cold than Bruce Wayne. Equal representation in all characters is boring. Babs being an amateur hero, a college girl who is doing this on her own is what makes her interesting. There is definitely a place for a badass heroine that's just as hard as Batman but it doesn't need to be Batgirl.
Joker has always been an equal opportunity killer, Batgirl could be easily be swapped with a teen Robin and the variant cover would still work.