• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rafael Albuquerque reveals controversial variant cover for Batgirl #41

Status
Not open for further replies.
see? thats part of the "holir than thou" attitude who rub the wrong way of people its always the "you missed the point " you are ignorant" " you dont know"

always the same




way to ignore the other covers...no problem fella
I hadn't scrolled to the bottom to see your other slightly less idiotic examples.
 
Finally good enough?

Yeah, that definitely looks more in line with this cover.

Also, you began this with "You'd never see Batman crying on a cover" that then turned into "crying because afraid" which then turned into "afraid, but not of the scarecrow". If that's not goalpost moving I don't know what is.

My first post was a single sentence. You just spent more text summarizing and twisting it when you could have just quoted it. Here, allow me:

I don't imagine we'd ever see Batman with a terrified look in his face and a tear coming out of his eye no matter what situation Joker managed to put him in.

"I don't imagine we'd ever see." does not equal "You'd never see."
"Batman with a terrified look in his face and a tear coming out of his eye no matter what situation Joker managed to put him in." does not equal "crying because afraid."

I was very specific.
 
Not his fault you're too stupid to understand what's different about the pictures you dug up.

I hadn't scrolled to the bottom to see your other slightly less idiotic examples.
oh..the personal insults.

eb6140942424697bf997986aac9b2d682cd18a18fe192e4f81ba32f17b629a24.jpg
 
Pretty evocative. Standing behind her, gun pointing toward her center, "lip stick" and the her tears...

Ehhhhhhh... I don't know... It's not too much of a stretch.
 
What? How could a female be shown in a compromising position with a villain?! Batman and Robin have clearly failed in their manly mission to protect her!

And it's totally our job as manly men on the internet to prevent women from seeing one of their own in a temporary state of weakness, right guys?

...Right??

all the /s possible
 
I guess villains are not allowed to be villians unless it is focused on male superheroes per tumblr. So why is tumblr rage even relevant?
 
The problem, it seems to me, is that the cover is trying to be dead-serious and scary, on a book that isn't known for that. You can do this concept and actually play it a little more... jokey, I guess, instead of Joker-y. Have her giving him the side-eye and a skeptical look, with her arms folded, and turn the lights up a little bit. Have a stupid fuckin' "bang!" flag sticking out of the gun he's draping over her shoulder or something like that.

I mean, the Superman variant is spoofing "Can You Read My Mind" from Superman: The Movie - and that's a book that doesn't have the tone Batgirl does for the most part. So why is the Batgirl variant an intentionally disturbing reminder of how Joker FUCKED her up back in the 80s?

This is an image that wants to be nightmarish and twisted, attached to the front of a book that isn't that at all, referencing a part of the character's history that not even the writer of that specific event (Alan Moore) thinks is very tasteful.

It's a more lighthearted sort of book - the image should reflect that. Joker doesn't HAVE to be the malevolent psychopath he CAN be in this image. He can be goofy, and he should have been. There's a way to pull off this idea in a much more goofy way, and that it wasn't even attempted is a problem, and why you have some of the people who read the book and care about the character reacting to the variant cover in the way they are.
 
Yeah, that definitely looks more in line with this cover.



My first post was a single sentence. You just spent more text summarizing and twisting it when you could have just quoted it. Here, allow me:



"I don't imagine we'd ever see." does not equal "You'd never see."
"Batman with a terrified look in his face and a tear coming out of his eye no matter what situation Joker managed to put him in." does not equal "crying because afraid."

I was very specific.
Fair, enough. It got a bit mixed up with GringoSuave89 comment "Nope. Crying is apparently a girl thing."
So I apologize, you were fairly clear.
 
Comic books are serious business, I guess.

Hopefully those harmed by the nasty drawing will be able to heal, and become whole again.
 
I get it. The outrage is Batgirl shown in a vulnerable and frightened position and why there aren't similar covers for Batman. Well, since the ones with Scarecrow apparently don't count because terror that is caused by hallucinations isn't real, just comparing their two characters shows why we never see Batman in such a position.

His entire character is getting over his fears. Batman, as a persona for Bruce Wayne, is literally about conquering his fears and channeling them in a way that frightens whoever he's going after. I mean, it would be uncharacteristic of him to show such vulnerabilities in the face of villains he's soundly beaten. That's why his moments are vulnerability are reserved for traumatic events, such as when Todd died, or his parents died.

Batgirl's character isn't like that, nor has that ever really been how any of the Batgirls have been characterized.

Now, if you want other male superheroes in similar scenarios on covers? Look up Spiderman covers. There are a number of them

The problem, it seems to me, is that the cover is trying to be dead-serious and scary, on a book that isn't known for that.

It's a variant cover. Sometimes they're not even remotely related aside from having the characters on them
 
The problem, it seems to me, is that the cover is trying to be dead-serious and scary, on a book that isn't known for that. You can do this concept and actually play it a little more... jokey, I guess, instead of Joker-y. Have her giving him the side-eye and a skeptical look, with her arms folded, and turn the lights up a little bit. Have a stupid fuckin' "bang!" flag sticking out of the gun he's draping over her shoulder or something like that.

I mean, the Superman variant is spoofing "Can You Read My Mind" from Superman: The Movie - and that's a book that doesn't have the tone Batgirl does for the most part. So why is the Batgirl variant an intentionally disturbing reminder of how Joker FUCKED her up back in the 80s?

This is an image that wants to be nightmarish and twisted, attached to the front of a book that isn't that at all, referencing a part of the character's history that not even the writer of that specific event (Alan Moore) thinks is very tasteful.

It's a more lighthearted sort of book - the image should reflect that. Joker doesn't HAVE to be the malevolent psychopath he CAN be in this image. He can be goofy, and he should have been. There's a way to pull off this idea in a much more goofy way, and that it wasn't even attempted is a problem, and why you have some of the people who read the book and care about the character reacting to the variant cover in the way they are.



Well I do read the book and you're right, it is fairly lighthearted, but even it recently had the scene where Batgirl saw the painting of her in the wheelchair. That was creepy and dark as well. Plus it's a variant cover.
 
The problem, it seems to me, is that the cover is trying to be dead-serious and scary, on a book that isn't known for that. You can do this concept and actually play it a little more... jokey, I guess, instead of Joker-y. Have her giving him the side-eye and a skeptical look, with her arms folded, and turn the lights up a little bit. Have a stupid fuckin' "bang!" flag sticking out of the gun he's draping over her shoulder or something like that.

I mean, the Superman variant is spoofing "Can You Read My Mind" from Superman: The Movie - and that's a book that doesn't have the tone Batgirl does for the most part. So why is the Batgirl variant an intentionally disturbing reminder of how Joker FUCKED her up back in the 80s?

This is an image that wants to be nightmarish and twisted, attached to the front of a book that isn't that at all, referencing a part of the character's history that not even the writer of that specific event (Alan Moore) thinks is very tasteful.

It's a more lighthearted sort of book - the image should reflect that. Joker doesn't HAVE to be the malevolent psychopath he CAN be in this image. He can be goofy, and he should have been. There's a way to pull off this idea in a much more goofy way, and that it wasn't even attempted is a problem, and why you have some of the people who read the book and care about the character reacting to the variant cover in the way they are.

It's variant cover. Scottie Young does variant covers of "serious business" comics all the time.
 
What's the point of having any female superhero if you can't go into this type of territory with their stories? It just seems very limiting to me and not really promoting gender equality.
 
thats they funny thing with this kind of people

they have and argument,they want proof,covers etc

people give them these covers and when they a realise they are wrong them they get into "insult" mode

its sad but its always the same

Was Batman ever sexually assaulted by a villain? was he photographed while it happened? were those photographs used as a cheap sadistic plot device to hurt a man rather than focus on the female victim herself? If so, is there a cover of Batman that reminisces on that scenario?
 
Well I do read the book and you're right, it is fairly lighthearted, but even it recently had the scene where Batgirl saw the painting of her in the wheelchair. That was creepy and dark as well. Plus it's a variant cover.

I know, I'm just trying to present an alternative that maybe should have been considered (or maybe it was and they said "no, we don't wanna do that") that not only would have fit the book's tone a little bit better, but would have staved off the negative emotions the variant seems to be engendering.

People like to like the Joker. People like to like Barbara. Playing Joker as an annoyance to Barbara in a variant seems like a much more fun thing to do than playing Joker as being so scary Barbara is reduced to a frozen, crying thing. Often variants are a chance to play around and have fun.
Hell, Bolland (the artist of Killing Joke) has Joker dancing with Wonder Woman and holding a bomb in his hands, while Wonder Woman has a "not this shit" look on her face. Going through the variants right now - this is the ONLY one that seems to be not going for either "funny" or "cool-looking," and is instead going for "scary"

It's variant cover. Scottie Young does variant covers of "serious business" comics all the time.

I know it's a variant cover, Slayven. And Skottie Young doing variants of serious business books is neither here nor there, as taking something serious and subverting it is completely different from taking something more lighthearted and trying to make it fucked up and scary. Hell, that stupid Power/Rangers thing was entirely about pointing out how empty-silly it is to go out of your way to kick dirt on generally good-natured things solely for the sake of being "cool."

I think it's well done, and it absolutely evokes the emotions it's meant to. I'm just pointing out the ways in which that approach could have been shifted a little.

edit: I mean, I'm sure the google-fu will be strong, but can anyone post serious/scary/fucked-up variants to lighthearted books as a comparison point? Because I can't even come up with a good example or two right now off the top of my head.
 
Was Batman ever sexually assaulted by a villain? was he photographed while it happened? were those photographs used as a cheap sadistic plot device to hurt a man rather than focus on the female victim herself? If so, is there a cover of Batman that reminisces on that scenario?

Talia pulled a bill Cosby on batman
 
Was Batman ever sexually assaulted by a villain? was he photographed while it happened? were those photographs used as a cheap sadistic plot device to hurt a man rather than focus on the female victim herself? If so, is there a cover of Batman that reminisces on that scenario?

he was raped, then raised the child of said rape
 
Was Batman ever sexually assaulted by a villain? was he photographed while it happened? were those photographs used as a cheap sadistic plot device to hurt a man rather than focus on the female victim herself? If so, is there a cover of Batman that reminisces on that scenario?

i think in almost 70 years of batman comics he have been shoot,killed,back breaked by bane,destroyed,punched,RAPED BY A WOMAN etc etc

but its easy to insult me...thats the easy way
 
Was Batman ever sexually assaulted by a villain? was he photographed while it happened? were those photographs used as a cheap sadistic plot device to hurt a man rather than focus on the female victim herself? If so, is there a cover of Batman that reminisces on that scenario?

Batman was raped by Talia, but they never tried to push a trauma angle with it like they do for barbara. Dick was raped by Tarantula, but, yet again, they didn't push a victim angle with it after it happened. It just happened and was swept under the rug.

Cassandra fucking Cain and don't you forget it!

Who?
 
There's a lot going on in this image besides "oh noes! She's crying!"

Joker's "I'm going to enjoy this" grin

His arm wrapped around her, pulling her up against him

The bodily fluids smeared around her mouth.

when you combined that with her look of terror and the fact that Joker has sexually assaulted Barbara in canon, it definitely comes together as an extremely rapey image.
 
Was Batman ever sexually assaulted by a villain? was he photographed while it happened? were those photographs used as a cheap sadistic plot device to hurt a man rather than focus on the female victim herself? If so, is there a cover of Batman that reminisces on that scenario?

Both Batman and Nightwing have been drugged and rapped.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom