Been confirmed since like day 1.
The way they awkwardly spliced the word "alien" into his dialogue still makes me chuckle.
Been confirmed since like day 1.
Maybe I'm super-slow and it's already been pointed out, but I only just noticed what I'm pretty sure is Neil Degrasse Tyson in the trailer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe1LrMqURuw#t=22s
"We're talking about a being whose very existence challenges our own sense of priority in the universe."
If it's not him, it sounds identical to him.
The Arkham games tell me that he can:
![]()
Latino review is saying they are going to filmand thatJoker killing Jason Todd and that's why Ben Affleck is there, this scene will be in BvS in the form of a flashbackBatman will be SS, because the batmobile is in the set
I'm guessing they were waiting to cast Joker to film that scene.
What if Batman vs Superman is actually a sequel to The Dark Knight Rises and Ben Affleck's Bruce Wayne is actually Christian Bale a decade later and this movie finally answers the age-old question of "How Can Officer Blake Become Batman With No Training".
The answer is, he didn't.
![]()
Joker's final prophecy came to pass. The city went crazy. They did battle forever. Joker went crazier and crazier. After Bruce bummed around Italy and banged Selina for a year, he came back, cause Batman finally consumed him.
C-C-C-Cross post
![]()
The way they awkwardly spliced the word "alien" into his dialogue still makes me chuckle.
So I saw some Avengers 2 spoilers that got me thinking about DC's movie slate: at the end of the film, there is anAt the start of their movie universe Marvel took characters nobody outside of comics knew about and made them huge, and they are going to continue this trend with the above spoilers and the Black Panther and Captain Marvel movies. Then I look at DC's movie slate and see that all they have planned for now to 2020 are movies for their most popular characters and I think that's a waste. They should shove some Blue Beetle, Amethyst, or Dr. Fate in there. And Dick Grayson should definitely exist, so he can take the Batman mantle when Ben Affleck is done. I would much rather legacy characters come to prominence than see heroes constantly get re-casted.almost completely new Avengers team.
So I saw some Avengers 2 spoilers that got me thinking about DC's movie slate: at the end of the film, there is anAt the start of their movie universe Marvel took characters nobody outside of comics knew about and made them huge, and they are going to continue this trend with the above spoilers and the Black Panther and Captain Marvel movies. Then I look at DC's movie slate and see that all they have planned for now to 2020 are movies for their most popular characters and I think that's a waste. They should shove some Blue Beetle, Amethyst, or Dr. Fate in there. And Dick Grayson should definitely exist, so he can take the Batman mantle when Ben Affleck is done. I would much rather legacy characters come to prominence than see heroes constantly get re-casted.almost completely new Avengers team.
If they're gonna shop, at least photoshop me up some white eyes.
Lets just get this out of the way:
better??
So I saw some Avengers 2 spoilers that got me thinking about DC's movie slate: at the end of the film, there is anAt the start of their movie universe Marvel took characters nobody outside of comics knew about and made them huge, and they are going to continue this trend with the above spoilers and the Black Panther and Captain Marvel movies. Then I look at DC's movie slate and see that all they have planned for now to 2020 are movies for their most popular characters and I think that's a waste. They should shove some Blue Beetle, Amethyst, or Dr. Fate in there. And Dick Grayson should definitely exist, so he can take the Batman mantle when Ben Affleck is done. I would much rather legacy characters come to prominence than see heroes constantly get re-casted.almost completely new Avengers team.
It's the universe that's become the draw more so than the characters themselves.Alot of people forget about that very fact. Especially in this forum.
They're going to CGI his neck in later, right? Or did the Dark Knight learn to turtle, in preparation for his battle with the Man of Murder?
^ Perfection.
Easily the best Batman.
It'd be nice if he had a neck.
Just to clarify, Batfleck is the peak version of Batman right?
Not the new-to-crimefighting or rusty Nolan versions.
Just to clarify, Batfleck is the peak version of Batman right?
Not the new-to-crimefighting or rusty Nolan versions.
Batman in color:
![]()
So is that thing bullet proof?
The suit in the Noland movies looks like it offers better protection and better armor.
Batman shouldn't have "armor." It's terrible design for his character. That's why Nolan's Batman looked like shit.So is that thing bullet proof?
The suit in the Noland movies looks like it offers better protection and better armor.
I still find it hilarious that in the first scene that Batman shows up in Batman 89, he gets fucking shot point blank by some low level thugs, looolz.This is a Batman that doesn't get shot. You know, like Batman.
It's a bad Batman photo for sure. We'll never see him in that sort of lighting condition. It also looks like he can take some shots? Looks like there's some bullet holes on him.Regarding the suit - I like it a lot, but that is a bad pose to take a picture of. The texture makes me think it's totally knife proof. Doesn't look like you can slice through it.
Yep, I agree. And that gif is just so fucking baller. God I love seeing a beast mode Batman that actually looks like he can wreck shit.It's a bad Batman photo for sure. We'll never see him in that sort of lighting condition. It also looks like he can take some shots? Looks like there's some bullet holes on him.
![]()
Yeah I get the whole context for the full scene, but I just always found that funny.Having him fall down to those shots in that moment and subsequently getting up from it feeds into the very urban myths the two thugs were discussing just seconds ago. Theatrics.
![]()
Hm..... not liking it.