The Witcher 3 | Review Thread

HVpdVob.gif


KZ3X13g.gif
 
Jeff Gerstmann was on Gamespot's "The Lobby" and said he played approx 3 hours, felt that combat and movement was janky and that it crashed on him a couple of times. So there's ya go.
 
For fuck sake so many screenshots, not sure if I should keep checking this thread, don't want to get everything spoiled.

I picked screenshots that weren't really spoilerish.. I saw some scenes where there are some characters from past games, mainly from TW2, but didn't wanted to post them here - I don't want to spoil some great moments, even though those scenes looked great :)
 
Jeff Gerstmann was on Gamespot's "The Lobby" and said he played approx 3 hours, felt that combat and movement was janky and that it crashed on him a couple of times. So there's ya go.

I have posted this exact same thing in probably the last 4-5 big game review threads.

I like Giantbomb but I don't think Jeff enjoys video games much anymore, he is so cynical its hard to take anything he says seriously.
 
Everything sounds fucking amazing bar the fetch quests and framerate issues (which I really hope the Day 1 patch fixes).

Seems like CDPR have raised the bar for every other RPG developer out there. Amazing.

Well, I'm not too worried about either of those things personally. Not all reviews agree with the fetch quest thing, and everybody seems to agree there's more depth and meaning to the side quests than there is in other RPGs. And I'll be playing on my PC and gsync monitor so the framerate thing is irrelevant for me. But I do recognize the framerate could be an issue for some people and I sincerely hope that version will be fixed with a patch.
 
I picked screenshots that weren't really spoilerish.. I saw some scenes where there are some characters from past games, mainly from TW2, but didn't wanted to post them here - I don't want to spoil some great moments, even though those scenes looked great :)

If you posted those I would find you, and I would kill you.

(channeling my inner Liam Neeson a bit, not to take seriously)

I really hope I will get to meet Saskia, but I don't want that spoiled.
 
Playstation Official Magazine UK

May 12, 2015

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is a surprising failure as an open-world video game, but within its beautifully lit world of monsters lies a much more traditional story-driven RPG of immense quality.

I just saw this review snippet (via Metacritic), which almost completely contradicts all the other reviews.

Opinions seem all over the place on this one. I'm feeling a big Open World vs. Traditional RPG tug-of-war with many reviewers.

It's interesting to see what some people see as perfection vs. what others see as a failure.

Reviews/Reactions are almost as dramatic as the game itself.
 
I picked screenshots that weren't really spoilerish.. I saw some scenes where there are some characters from past games, mainly from TW2, but didn't wanted to post them here - I don't want to spoil some great moments, even though those scenes looked great :)

I don't mind being spoiled in that regard :p

If you wanna keep it private to stop spoiling folks here that's understandable.

Cheers :)
 
I just saw this review snippet (via Metacritic), which almost completely contradicts all the other reviews.

Opinions seem all over the place on this one. I'm feeling a big Open World vs. Traditional RPG tug-of-war with many reviewers.

It's interesting to see what some people see as perfection vs. what others see as a failure.

Reviews/Reactions are almost as dramatic as the game itself.

Well, I think they wanted a sandbox style experience, but even though TW3 is open-world, it isn't a sandbox style game
 
Well, I'm not too worried about either of those things personally. Not all reviews agree with the fetch quest thing, and everybody seems to agree there's more depth and meaning to the side quests than there is in other RPGs.

Not that I'm worried about the fetch quest, but which review sites said that there are (bad) fetch quests? I only saw IGN mention it.
 
3 hours out of a 200 hour game?

Having 170 hours of "fetching" doesn't make for a compelling argument (it doesn't have to be a quest to be pointless busy work).

I'll wait for the backlash on this one. The scores are great... But I just can't bring myself to believe them. Blame Dragon Age
 
He put 100 hours into it and leveled up to 35, out of 60 O_o

Said there was stuff still too high level for him when he beat the game.

That sounds very good, provided the it is quality content leading up to all these hours.

Even being max lvl we can't distribute skill points everywhere?
 
Having 170 hours of "fetching" doesn't make for a compelling argument (it doesn't have to be a quest to be pointless busy work).

What do you consider to be "pointless"? VanOrd says he doesn't really try to "play" all the things/everything when he reviews. His 100 hours felt natural and not completionist.
 
Having 170 hours of "fetching" doesn't make for a compelling argument (it doesn't have to be a quest to be pointless busy work).

I'll wait for the backlash on this one. The scores are great... But I just can't bring myself to believe them. Blame Dragon Age

There is always a "backlash". We will probably have threads within a week of launch saying how the game was disapointing and didn't deliver.

Regardless the consensus seems to be its a fantastic RPG.
 
What's up with the title? Gersmann is a reviewer, his comments aren't any less valid than anyone elses just because it goes against the grain.
 
Gamespot.com has Kevin VanOrd on The Lobby going over his review and final thoughts on the Witcher starting at around 47 minutes in. He's answering questions, too.
 
Witcher 3 is getting amazing reviews without that patch, so, seriously? I'm just not worried.

Any further improvements are just extra gravy.

God damn. Get out of here with that calm, rational thinking.

You'll make the wheels fall off the ceaseless-negativity-and-griping bandwagon.
Then the sky really will fall on everyone's heads.
 
I would make a pact with the Devil to play this game right now. I'll do anything: sacrifice a goat, push my grandmother down the stairs, anything. LET ME PLAY ;-;
 
So, regarding side/fetch quests (very slight spoilers):

VanOrd said early in the game, there is a quest that you may or may not encounter where
a girl may end up chained to a post on an island, sentenced to starve to death.

Hours later, as he was sailing around, lo and behold he found a random island with a dead body chained to a post, and Geralt goes into an internal monologue on death, God, etc.

BUT--there was never any mission assigned to "go to island and pay respects" or anything like that. It felt like a natural occurence in the game world, and stuff like that happens all the time.

For the record, he had two crashes in 100 hours of playtime.
 
So, regarding side/fetch quests (very slight spoilers):

VanOrd said early in the game, there is a quest that you may or may not encounter where
a girl may end up chained to a post on an island, sentenced to starve to death.

Hours later, as he was sailing around, lo and behold he found a random island with a dead body chained to a post, and Geralt goes into an internal monologue on death, God, etc.

BUT--there was never any mission assigned to "go to island and pay respects" or anything like that. It felt like a natural occurence in the game world, and stuff like that happens all the time.

For the record, he had two crashes in 100 hours of playtime.

God, I just absolutely love things like that.

This motherfucking game.
 
What's up with the title? Gersmann is a reviewer, his comments aren't any less valid than anyone elses just because it goes against the grain.

If you missed it earlier, the title was edited because his innocuous tweet completely derailed the thread. It was a tweet that he wasn't enjoying the game. This is fine in and of itself, but it lead to a lot of damage control/metacommenatary about Gerstmann and Giant Bomb. It dominated several pages of the thread. Seeing as how Giant Bomb hasn't submitted a review, this was all irrelevant and frankly annoying to read. I promise you that I'm neither praising nor criticizing Giant Bomb here, and this isn't meant to serve as commentary about that site's quality. It has nothing to do with Giant Bomb and everything to do with the fact that the conversation surrounding Gerstmann's limited, non-review commentary about the game was drivel.
 
So, regarding side/fetch quests (very slight spoilers):

VanOrd said early in the game, there is a quest that you may or may not encounter where
a girl may end up chained to a post on an island, sentenced to starve to death.

Hours later, as he was sailing around, lo and behold he found a random island with a dead body chained to a post, and Geralt goes into an internal monologue on death, God, etc.

BUT--there was never any mission assigned to "go to island and pay respects" or anything like that. It felt like a natural occurence in the game world, and stuff like that happens all the time.

For the record, he had two crashes in 100 hours of playtime.

Dang....


That's kind of cool as hell.
 
Top Bottom