Leatherface
Member
wtf is this shit? Is that chart for real?!
I'm worried about my 660ti I'm still debating to go with PC or ps4. Will my 660ti run this as well as the ps4?
Well I don't have a six core cpu or ddr4 ram
Check your CPU though
i5 2500k @ 4.3ghz.... Good enough?
Wonder how my GTX 680 will fare. Been out of the PC gaming scene for a year so I'm not sure how my card stacks up anymore.
Read on the Gameworks page but still a little bit confused, is it a tool for developers? is it a extra setting option with more eyecandy?
Better than a PS4, not as good as current gen GPU's, is the short of it. Benchmarks should start appearing soon,I hope!
wtf is this shit? Is that chart for real?!
Both. It's a set of libraries/APIs that devs can use to bring us more eye candy. In this case, hair works, HBAO and PhysX.
So it looks like I can do Uber with Gameworks at 30fps+ safely.
This is saying it includes AA too doesn't it?
I don't care about AA much, unless I'm taking screenshots, so maybe I can push closer to 60fps. I'll crank everything and see how she does. Then I'll toss in some low level AA and see how far it goes to stay above 30.
i7 920 @ 3.4ghz
GTX 980
9GB Triple Channel
I don't know how people can stomach 30 FPS on a PC. It looks horrible. Worse than 30 on a console from what I can remember. Maybe due to frame pacing or something.
so, even if I were to cap the game at 30 fps, I wouldnt be able to get gameworks on my 970? This is very disappointing if so
How does a 680 4gb compare to the 900 series cards? Is it up there with the 970?
Wait a second, so a 980 wont give you 60 frames at 1080p with everything uber plus hair works? I thought they said it would, now im starting to regret buying the card if i have to start to dial settings down
So in this case I have a 970 how do I go about activating gameworks for Witcher 3?, is it in the Witcher graphic options settings or in the Nvidia drivers? because going by the descriptions in the OP Uber Settings doesn't mean GW is on.
5930k@4.4ghzwhich cpu?
With 2 970's, I would only be concerned with CPU.Yeah going to fool around with some overclocking on my 970FTWs and and see if I can get them to at least 980 levels.
Just want a solid 30fps (with occasional dips) ultra, gameworks, and 4K. Anything at that level or better and I will be more than happy.
It does include AA, but keep in mind that it's single-toggle post process AA, which isn't going to give you the kind of performance bump you are expecting by disabling it.
Um, no?
Of course you could.
EDIT: Why do people post uninformed statements and questioning? Surely it is not hard to come to an understanding of what your hardware is or is not capable of.
Then you should go for the PS4 version.
It looked horrible until I added RivaTuner into the mix. It makes it look identical to consoles' 30fps.I don't know how people can stomach 30 FPS on a PC. It looks horrible. Worse than 30 on a console from what I can remember. Maybe due to frame pacing or something.
You happen to unfortunately be the post I quoted, but yes, it is somewhat distressing that you bought something very expensive without knowing how well it works or not.because I literally just got my 970 yesterday...not sure why you have to be a condescending dick, but ok
670 here, i guess i'm getting it for PS4.
![]()
I have a i7 2600k @ 4.2, that should do the job, at least i hope it doesShould we be concerned that the CPU in those requirements is more than what the majority of people probably spent on their entire PC?
i5 4690k @4.4
GTX 970 sli both OC'ed
32GB 1866mhz DDR3
Playing at 1080p I should be able to keep this up above 60fps pretty signicantly?
You happen to unfortunately be the post I quoted, but yes, it is somewhat distressing that you bought something very expensive without knowing how well it works or not.
I was planning on getting a 970 but my CPU is a fx-6350.
Would that be a bad idea?
Yes, for something that isn't released with requirements released today. How uninformed of him.
But... But was your SYSTEM born ready?!
The in-game graphics settings have them. Hairworks can be switched on manually for any setting. It is on by default for Uber and you can choose to switch it off. HBAO+ requires you to set Ambient Occlusion to "Quality" in your control panel (or you could use HBAO in-game setting for AO). I'm not sure if the in-game HBAO is the same as the Nvidia HBAO+, so either Andy can confirm or we can find out at launch. PhysX comes by default and you can't really change it.
This entire thread is an OP about how the 970 (and other similar cards) runs. Yes, not reading the OP and asking a question is quite uninformed. Or even taking the 5 seconds to perhaps calculate in the brain that a 970 is how much worse than a 980?
I don't know how people can stomach 30 FPS on a PC. It looks horrible. Worse than 30 on a console from what I can remember. Maybe due to frame pacing or something.
Did you even pay attention to the rest of the components in that chart? A 970 doesn't guarantee that when the CPU in that build is $1000 alone.
Did you even pay attention to the rest of the components in that chart? A 970 doesn't guarantee that when the CPU in that build is $1000 alone.
Decent, mostly yes, especially if you have the 3 GB model. For example I can run GTA V with high settings at 1080p (FXAA) 60 FPS. But I have the 2 GB (which is actually 1.5 + 512 MB, just like the 970 4 GB is 3.5 GB + 512 MB) so I have serious issues with textures. For example in GTA V high textures means some issues loading the city (some stuff dissapearing sometimes) albeit it's rare. High texture quality in Dying Light means some stuttering, and so on.I as well. Although, I have absolutely no idea what's worth it when it comes to video cards. I don't even try to keep up with that because they just keep coming endlessly.
Is 660 ti even considered decent anymore?