The Witcher 3: Is your system ready - Nvidia official system requirements

Cool. I actually just ordered my 960 less than an hour ago. Still waiting on the Witcher 3 code to get here.

It takes a few days. If you ordered from Amazon and it hasn't arrived by Monday, just contact customer service and they can give you the codes then and there.
 
Hmmm, I'm guessing Ultra@60 FPS on 1080 will be out of the question?

i7 3770 @ 3.4 GHz
GTX 970
10 GB RAM


Why would you guess that.


tweet.png


That card is the exact one recommended for Uber settings at 1080p, for 40+ FPS in the most demanding situation, on an old build.

Throw in a little OC if you haven't already, and you should be able to easily hit 50-60 fairly constantly.
 
Sorry to ask this question again boys and girls. but.

Honest question.
this is my rig
I7 4770k oc'd@4.1.
GTX TITAN. (og ver)
16gb RAM @1866mhz.

Will i be able to play on uber with gameworks @1080/60. ?
 
I'm convinced half of the posts in here are people looking for others to say how good their PC's are and they know full well how good their system is.
 
I'm not really picky. I guess medium settings? I do want to appreciate how beautiful the game world is, but it does have to be super-high graphics. Oh, and I'd like ti to run well with no frame drops.
60fps? 30 fps?

Your computer is pretty good, you're gonna be able to find a mix of settings that will make you happy, I guarantee it.
 
Hmmm, I'm guessing Ultra@60 FPS on 1080 will be out of the question?

i7 3770 @ 3.4 GHz
GTX 970
10 GB RAM

Sorry to ask this question again boys and girls. but.

Honest question.
this is my rig
I7 4770k oc'd@4.1.
GTX TITAN. (og ver)
16gb RAM @1866mhz.

Will i be able to play on uber with gameworks @1080/60. ?
Nah both of you will have to settle for 720p low settings
 
I'm convinced half of the posts in here are people looking for others to say how good their PC's are and they know full well how good their system is.
Sorry if i come across that, but i swear to you it's an honest question, and not a humble brag or troll.

Sorry again, if i'm coming off that way.
 
My second 970 should be here any day, paired w my 2600k@4.4, I'll be maxin and relaxin on my 1080p panny plasma with gobs of AA.
 
Something that isn't often mentioned is RAM. I have 8GB of 2400mhz RAM and I wonder if I should get either 8GB more or go to DDR4. Does it really make a difference?
 
PC Games Hardware has a preview of the PC Build:

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Technik-Test-1158845/

German so a quick and dirty translation


- Preview build so no final benchmark
- GTX 770/R280X is enough for Ultra
- 2GB VRAM is enough
- Config files offer a lot of tuning (view distance, shadow resolution, texture size)
- Great multithreading (used all cores on a 4790k)
- midrange GPU and 3ghz 4 core (intel) CPU is enough for highest settings and good fps

EDIT: Saw it already posted in another comment. Ah well. Repeat for visibility then^^
 
I'm convinced half of the posts in here are people looking for others to say how good their PC's are and they know full well how good their system is.

Waiting for the inevitable "so I bought two Titan X's... Can I play this on high settings in 1080p?"
 
PC Games Hardware has a preview of the PC Build:

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Technik-Test-1158845/

German so a quick and dirty translation


- Preview build so no final benchmark
- GTX 770/R280X is enough for Ultra
- 2GB VRAM is enough
- Config files offer a lot of tuning (view distance, shadow resolution, texture size)
- Great multithreading (used all cores on a 4790k)
- midrange GPU and 3ghz 4 core (intel) CPU is enough for highest settings and good fps

EDIT: Saw it already posted in another comment. Ah well. Repeat for visibility then^^

Sounds quite optimized, not super CPU bound as I thought it might be. Good to hear.
 
GTX 680 is very slightly below the 770, which is even more below the 970. You'll still get great performance though. You'll need to turn something down a notch though to get similar framerates to a GTX 970.



It will give you around 60 FPS.
The target is to keep it above 40 FPS. It'll likely stay around 60. If you want to avoid turning settings down in brand new games to keep high framerates, you needed to buy a Titan X.

Hopefully turning of DOF, Motion Blur, turning down shadows, and removing some other fx will help get 1080p 60.

Does Hair Works benefit from a second gpu used only for PhysX?
 
PC Games Hardware has a preview of the PC Build:

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Witcher-3-PC-237266/Specials/Technik-Test-1158845/

German so a quick and dirty translation


- Preview build so no final benchmark
- GTX 770/R280X is enough for Ultra
- 2GB VRAM is enough
- Config files offer a lot of tuning (view distance, shadow resolution, texture size)
- Great multithreading (used all cores on a 4790k)
- midrange GPU and 3ghz 4 core (intel) CPU is enough for highest settings and good fps

EDIT: Saw it already posted in another comment. Ah well. Repeat for visibility then^^
Was just getting ready to say it was time to retire the card too. Wooo. This makes me happy.
 
Waiting for the inevitable "so I bought two Titan X's... Can I play this on high settings in 1080p?"

Even better will be the "i bought two Titan X's, and all i get is 22fps" and it turns out they are running 6 instances of the game, like that one other thread.
 
Oh and for all you freaks out there:

VRAM usage in 5K and Ultra Settings: Maximum of 5,6GB. A lot of room left on a Titan X^^

xxx_the_witcher_3_maxn2x0r.jpg
 
With my i7 and 970 I wonder if I should play on high instead of uber so I can get a locked 60FPS. anything below 60FPS and I get insane screen tearing even with triple buffering and v-sync so I'd rather go for it locked.
 
Oh and for all you freaks out there:

VRAM usage in 5K and Ultra Settings: Maximum of 5,6GB. A lot of room left on a Titan X^^

xxx_the_witcher_3_maxn2x0r.jpg

In 5K or 4K?


Trying to run it in 4K on my SLI 970's and 5.6 is a little more than I am packing. (Or than the SLI 980'S from the chart are packing for that matter)
 
haha could I please have a link to this wonderful incident?

It was in the fall sometime, I forget the exact game, but this style, so maybe Batman? Turned out that Steam big picture mode was messing up and kept bouncing him to the game selection screen. So he kept starting the game again thinking it had crashed, when it was just running in the background.
 
PCgameshardware.de posted a Witcher 3 video [click me] . They are running the game in 4k (downsampled) on a single titan x (w/o hairworks). Just incase some wants to see it.

-In general they seem to be very pleased with the game (no day1 patch and no nvidia optimized drivers so far)

-Multicore CPU useage is good.

-The game doesn't seem to be very CPU heavy (they mention that they were able to downcloak their test CPU to 2 ghz and the game still ran good).

-High End GPUs can render the game in 1440p (ultra, w/o hairworks).

-Mid range GPUs run the game in 1080p (ultra, w/o hairworks).

-VRAM usage is pretty moderate: 2560x1440 ~ 2.5 gb vram (max usage).

-No loading screens.

-Tessellation is not that high (8x-16x), but it still looks good.

-NVIDIA Hairworks is very performance hungry and should only be used with high end GPUs.

PC options screenshots

Downsampled (5k) PC ultra screenshots

4k Youtube Video

EDIT: It was already posted.... sorry.
 
So 750TI is bumped off the map for 1080p, huh? I'm planning a new build, I guess 960 and upwards it is.

Though at this point, I think I'll just wait it out for the next generation, dat process node shrink.
 
Top Bottom