Wasn't it more because they weren't married to them. Andhe gave them a choice between castration and marrying the wildlings
no, and she shouldn't have been. I'm saying that after being exposed to these horrid experiences, it's kind of jarring to see her go from someone who agreed to marry Ramsey, to whaling when consummation comes around. I have no doubt that her screaming gave Ramsey satisfaction and she knows that it would... why would she give him that satisfaction?
I feel like this rape stuff has overshadowed how bad the sand snakes plot is.
Why haven't they written articles calling for all four actresses playing these characters to be fired?
I am outraged.
Wasn't it more because they weren't married to them. Andhe gave them a choice between castration and marrying the wildlings
Cause she's a human being? I don't mean that to be pedantic, I mean that maybe we're forgetting that people can be strong sometimes, weak other times and a shit load of other things that aren't expected. I think often times when sexual abuse or violence against women is portrayed in fiction, we get this... Powerful woman who fights back, or is stoic, or in some way gains something or is saved in the last moment. I think that maybe we've come to expect that sometimes.no, and she shouldn't have been. I'm saying that after being exposed to these horrid experiences, it's kind of jarring to see her go from someone who agreed to marry Ramsey, to whaling when consummation comes around. I have no doubt that her screaming gave Ramsey satisfaction and she knows that it would... why would she give him that satisfaction?
it's kind of jarring to see her go from someone who agreed to marry Ramsey, to whaling when consummation comes around.
no, and she shouldn't have been. I'm saying that after being exposed to these horrid experiences, it's kind of jarring to see her go from someone who agreed to marry Ramsey, to whaling when consummation comes around. I have no doubt that her screaming gave Ramsey satisfaction and she knows that it would... why would she give him that satisfaction?
![]()
Now that would have been a great scene.
I actually thought that there was a part that made rape out to be acceptable... when Drogo first weds Daenerys, he is raping her at the beginning. She later falls in love with him and starts playing a more active role in the sex, dedicating herself to him and the Dothraki.. Was this not basically saying it's okay to rape your wife, because if she's a good wife then she'll eventually love you and dedicate herself to you and your friends. Weird how the Sansa scene is the one that gets the flak.
I actually thought that there was a part that made rape out to be acceptable... when Drogo first weds Daenerys, he is raping her at the beginning. She later falls in love with him and starts playing a more active role in the sex, dedicating herself to him and the Dothraki.. Was this not basically saying it's okay to rape your wife, because if she's a good wife then she'll eventually love you and dedicate herself to you and your friends. Weird how the Sansa scene is the one that gets the flak.
A lot of husbands that rape their wives are in love with said wives.None of the scenes are saying rape is okay, anyone getting this message is just looking for a fight. Dany falling in love was due to her character and her situation. Drogo even if you consider what he did rape, did love her and all things considered treated her better than anyone had in her lifetime.
Well just because she was prepared doesn't mean it wasn't going to hurt, she's still a 15 year old virgin.
Most importantly the reason she cracked is because she never saw the curveball of Theon staying there to watch, that's the moment her stoic demeanor falters. Sansa steeled herself to handle the pain and shame of what Ramsey was going to do but she never considered that Theon, someone so close to her and someone she hates so much would be made to witness her lowest moment.
Sansa's becoming more and more of a tough girl, but Ramsey is still too damn good at what he does, she(and hardly anyone else really) could never have prepared for someone as sadistic and evil as Ramsey.
That got plenty of talk, too. Pretty much everything on this show where everyone is like "PEOPLE DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING WHEN THIS HAPPENED IN EARLIER SEASONS" was talked about just like this.I actually thought that there was a part that made rape out to be acceptable... when Drogo first weds Daenerys, he is raping her at the beginning. She later falls in love with him and starts playing a more active role in the sex, dedicating herself to him and the Dothraki.. Was this not basically saying it's okay to rape your wife, because if she's a good wife then she'll eventually love you and dedicate herself to you and your friends? Weird how the Sansa scene is the one that gets the flak.
A lot of husbands that rape their wives are in love with said wives.
Yo, people are just talking about their own interpretations. It's going to be different than yours. No need to dismiss another opinion as looking for a fight just because you saw it your own way.None of the scenes are saying rape is okay, anyone getting this message is just looking for a fight.
Yo, people are just talking about their own interpretations. It's going to be different than yours. No need to dismiss another opinion as looking for a fight just because you saw it your own way.
It's really the only scene I remember in GOT where I felt like the rape was looked upon as acceptable... I mean the victim falling in love with her rapist and dedicating herself to him? Not acceptable even though they just married. If Daenerys had killed Drogo to get of the marriage, that would have been better.That got plenty of talk, too. Pretty much everything on this show where everyone is like "PEOPLE DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING WHEN THIS HAPPENED IN EARLIER SEASONS" was talked about just like this.
It's entirely possible. Give the thought a chance before dismissing it entirely. People are already on D+D for their statements that denied that what happened to Cersei was rape.Sorry, I just find it worrying that just because there's a rape scene in fiction that some people might think the writer's are trying to send a message that rape is okay.
Also let's give it up for the dude who plays Ramsey. Never thought the sympathetic nerd from the Misfits and the aloof neighbor on Vicious could be this monstrous.
Does anyone remember this scene? It's actually more graphic than what happens to Sansa Stark.
![]()
Janos Slynt grabs a newborn baby and cuts its throat, then holds it by the leg as he goes around drowning and stabbing children.
People shit on the Dorne plot line when it was introduced and lo and behold, it continues to be shit. I don't really get why this story deserves to have a wait and see approach. It's been pretty stupid since the plan was revealed.
Yeah, he has a problem with the execution; but the point trying to be argued was that moving Sansa into the story arc itself was what people were upset about, not the rape. That's why I ended the quote where I did - to show that the anger wasn't about Sansa taking Jeyne's place in the story arc. Their anger is primarily based on the execution / other things.
Consummation of marriage is one of the most important aspects of Westeros. The books go into massive details on this alone.That showed how far they were going to make a political move of eliminating the bastards of the King. It showed that they were eliminating all bastards.
Contrast with forced intercourse between a known sadist and a professional victim.
My major problem with this is that, because of the glacial pace of the season, it was a huge waste of time. We knew how far he'd probably go and these implications were obvious as soon as she was promised to Ramsay.
no, and she shouldn't have been. I'm saying that after being exposed to these horrid experiences, it's kind of jarring to see her go from someone who agreed to marry Ramsey, to wailing when consummation comes around. I have no doubt that her screaming gave Ramsey satisfaction and she knows that it would... why would she give him that satisfaction?
Exactly. You can't win with these people. In the book, the repeated rape of Danny is treated as something that could actually happen in the real world (initially, the victim wants to commit suicide, while later the pain she experiences resolves into a kind of Stockholm syndrome), whereas the show creates some sort of unlikely narrative where Danny somehow takes control of her captor through sex. If the show were adapted directly from the text, the outcry would be much greater because people would claim that the show was sadistic for allowing audiences to contemplate the repeated rape of a 13 yo girl. Instead, we got a version where everything was toned down, and a more fantastic story was created than the more realistic one (a realistic story that yes, did explore the damage rape victims experience), that allows the victim to turn the tables on her oppressor and take control of her life....except do you forget the part where after the consummation, Khal rapes her so much that she wants to commit suicide, but instead Dany falls in love with her rapist whose behavior never changes? Yes. Let's stick with that version and see how it goes over. In the TV show they empower her to take charge of the relationship the rest of the way. Kinda think that one works out better for all parties intended.
Man, what the fuck is wrong with Ramsey?
Again and for the last time until I write out in detail how they could have finished the last episode with the same information better conveyed - there is nothing about the rape scene that couldn't be conveyed as effectively through dialogue other than the tension, discomfort, and violence. All of those could be conveyed in dialogue, but not felt as keenly. Why feeling that is necessary to the political motions of the story is beyond me.Consummation of marriage is one of the most important aspects of Westeros. The books go into massive details on this alone.
Us knowing that Sansa is possibly pregnant is incredibly important. Far more important than killing some bastards.
Ramsay is just Roose without highborn sensibilities.
Again and for the last time until I write out in detail how they could have finished the last episode with the same information better conveyed - there is nothing about the rape scene that couldn't be conveyed as effectively through dialogue other than the tension, discomfort, and violence. All of those could be conveyed in dialogue, but not felt as keenly. Why feeling that is necessary to the political motions of the story is beyond me.
I love that both groups' plans involved going to the gardens in the middle of the afternoon and kidnapping the girl. Just terrible.i agree, but I cringe everytime i think of jamie showing up in the water gardens and calling out to Myrcella...
I suppose it depends on the cock merchant.^
Asshole probably sells it for 30 bucks too.
Yeah, apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Roose, a man who murdered his king cowardly at a wedding... just disgraceful.
BTW, was Robb named after Robert Baratheon?
Don't forget raping Ramsay's mother on a whim after murdering her husband. Boltons are straight animals.
I don't think Robb came from Robert. Could be wrong, though.
Again and for the last time until I write out in detail how they could have finished the last episode with the same information better conveyed - there is nothing about the rape scene that couldn't be conveyed as effectively through dialogue other than the tension, discomfort, and violence. All of those could be conveyed in dialogue, but not felt as keenly. Why feeling that is necessary to the political motions of the story is beyond me.
Again and for the last time until I write out in detail how they could have finished the last episode with the same information better conveyed - there is nothing about the rape scene that couldn't be conveyed as effectively through dialogue other than the tension, discomfort, and violence. All of those could be conveyed in dialogue, but not felt as keenly. Why feeling that is necessary to the political motions of the story is beyond me.
No one was upset when they behead that guy with a rusty bit of metal that required multiple whacks with blood and spinal fluid flying everywhere. That was cool. Someone touched a fann? Get out.
Really dislike when rape is compared to murder. It's an entirely different kind of violence that I think as culture we're starting to understand the weight of.What the fuck are you talking about? Did you even read the thread? The reason this is being debated is because it doesn't serve the plot or the character development in any meaningful way. Its a depiction of rape for the sake of it.
At BEST the writers are probably using rape of a woman as a catalyst for a male's character development which is as shitty as tropes get.
It's not hard to just think sometimes.
If you disagree that's fine. But the whole "other violence is fine but rape is not huhuh?" dismissal is stupid.
What the fuck are you talking about? Did you even read the thread? The reason this is being debated is because it doesn't serve the plot or the character development in any meaningful way. Its a depiction of rape for the sake of it.
At BEST the writers are probably using rape of a woman as a catalyst for a male's character development which is as shitty as tropes get.
It's not hard to just think sometimes. Try to understand WHY people are reacting differently to this than they do to some of the other events on the show.
If you disagree that's fine. But the whole "other violence is fine but rape is not huhuh?" dismissal is stupid.
I'm sorry but I am not buying this. Regardless of whether or not what YOU wanted to happen it clearly is going to advance the plot and the character development of Sansa. Maybe you didn't like the direction which is fine.What the fuck are you talking about? Did you even read the thread? The reason this is being debated is because it doesn't serve the plot or the character development in any meaningful way. Its a depiction of rape for the sake of it.
At BEST the writers are probably using rape of a woman as a catalyst for a male's character development which is as shitty as tropes get.
It's not hard to just think sometimes. Try to understand WHY people are reacting differently to this than they do to some of the other events on the show.
If you disagree that's fine. But the whole "other violence is fine but rape is not huhuh?" dismissal is stupid.