Fallout 4 Officially Revealed for PC, Xbox One, PS4 [Reddit Rumor = Ban]

2015-06-0318_33_10-ryi2urp.png

All ingame footage too. That trailer didn't look like it was for a game releasing next year at all, looks like its damn near done. And the way they've chosen to reveal it, you'd expect them to keep it for a late surprise at their e3 conference if it was for next year.

It mightn't be mind blowing visually, but theres a definite improvement. Looking forward to the e3 gameplay.
FalloutNV2010-10-2312-37-32-64.png


fallout_4_screenshot___by_chabbles-d8vuxzl.png
 
Nope, no AO. And I think that's hurting the game's look more than most aspects of the visuals. Objects just don't look grounded and connected to the rest of the world. Getting some AO in there would massively improve the overall impression.

It's Bethesda so I'm not putting my hopes on it, but I believe that if they could implement AO most of the criticism would vanish like a bad Nuka Cola fart.
 
Although the graphics aren't the greatest, the game still looks great. I love that the game is colourful and not plagued with many shades of brown and grey like many last gen games.
 
I'm exited as I'm sure the game itself will be stellar but the graphics are really poor. It looks... Dare I say it... Like a cross gen game.

Thank the heavens for mods on the PC.
 
The most important thing here is that there's no ugly green screen filter. Graphics are closer to Skyrim than I expected, but that's what mods are for, I guess.
 
Post apocalyptic... with the V.A.T.S...

Now i need to now that this doesn't have any kind of coop or multi to be SOLD on it.

PD: and haven't got tons of shitty DLCs like other games nowadays.

I don't understand this post.

"This game better not let me play with a friend if I want to!"
 
Super excited for this, and I'm hoping it releases this year :) I can't tell, but are they using the engine that The Evil Within and Wolfenstein used, or a different one?
 
Yaay glad it finally got officially announced even though a bit earlier than I was expecting. The graphics look like what I expected from the next Bethesda Fallout game; shit. But then again, Fallout/Bethesda games are never known for their graphics lol. I think the last one looked like absolute dogshit as well.
 
Between the non-bullshot trailer, the development time, and those twitter comments, it really seems possible that it could release in 2015.
 
...Is this really not a Cross-Gen game? I mean I am thoroughly impressed by the style, but jesus christ, it really looks like it's meant for the PS3/360.

At the end of the day this looks like a 2012 game, not a game most likely coming in 2016.
 
The game looks good. It looks fine.

Does it look like The Witcher 3? No. That fame is pretty much the pinnacle of open world games thus far, it's crazy to hold every other game to that standard.

Fallout 4, based only on the early footage in this trailer, does not look as good as some other current gen titles. But it doesn't look bad. There's a difference between the two

And I think a lot of people have forgotten what PS3/360 games look like.
 
I'm exited as I'm sure the game itself will be stellar but the graphics are really poor. It looks... Dare I say it... Like a cross gen game.

Thank the heavens for mods on the PC.

Yeah at least the mods will make it a lot better.
 
After seeing and playing Witcher 3 large amounts this looks graphically very underwhelming, old and trusty Creation Engine is still in use I assume. Hopefully with good 64-bit support this time around, I want that support for proper memory usage.

Looking towards E3 presentation, hopefully we get to see large amount of gameplay! :)
 
Between the non-bullshot trailer, the development time, and those twitter comments, it really seems possible that it could release in 2015.

BET ON IT

Looks done and they showed a FULL TRAILER 2 weeks early

What else are they going to use the Presser for other then to blow up the media with info on the game

This will be a 2015 game for sure
 
Honestly, it looked damn good for VANILLA FO4.

Let's be honest, the people bitching are going to get it on the PC and mod the fuck out of it anyways.

I like how this is pretty much the standard excuse for any kind of criticism people can throw at bethesda.

"lol we know it sucks but there will be mods".
 
Not made by me but reflects the online community opinions pretty well:

14333498660958djbn.png

On the plus side, this means I still don't have to get that gtx980, yeah?

It's funny how in spite of all the downgrade complains very few people can get the witcher to run well. Fallout 4 won't have those issues I'm pretty sure, although I fear what Bethesda might try to put out on day 1.
 
Wow, this is the first trailer I have ever seen where I was actively complaining about graphics while watching. I love PS1 and sprite based games, why are the visuals in this game annoying to me?
Well, perhaps because Bethesda should have the budget of god and are apparently doing very little with it graphically?

I mean, I have no problem playing indie games with "objectively" much worse graphics, but I'm also a bit miffed.
 
This is the biggest question and would explain why the overall graphics quality is lower quality than expected.

Not really. Seamless transitions are mostly a memory thing, which is not really an issue on the consoles now. You don't render everything just because it's loaded into memory (at least not if your engine is even halfway competent), so it shouldn't have to mean significantly worse visuals. The Witcher 3 does seamless interiors while looking a lot better than this (and no, the seamless world is NOT the cause of that game's performance issues).
 
I think it's pretty petty to complain about the graphics in a Bethesda game.

That said story wise I hope that you are the baby and go through a similar sequence to FO3 in picking your appearance and SPECIAL in 2077 and then your parents evacuate you and your dog to Vault 111. You are then cryogenically frozen and only woken up ~20 years before the start of the game, so around 2277.

This would be better than playing as one of the two parents. Your backstory won't be as rigid.
 
...Is this really not a Cross-Gen game? I mean I am thoroughly impressed by the style, but jesus christ, it really looks like it's meant for the PS3/360.

At the end of the day this looks like a 2012 game, not a game most likely coming in 2016.

Who cares what gen it "looks like" it's for? That is not even close to being the most important factor with one of these games as PS3 owners of F3, NV & Skyrim can attest..
 
Am I the only one who thinks the game looks pretty damn fantastic, in terms of the graphics?

Do all games need to look as good as Witcher does in order to be passable? People wanted Fallout 4 for years, and when we finally get it the first thing people do is complain.
 
Watching the trailer again, I'm really impressed with how much the environments have improved. Some of those locations are so densely detailed and rich. Out of everything this is what's impressing me the most.
 
Am I the only one who thinks the game looks pretty damn fantastic, in terms of the graphics?

Do all games need to look as good as Witcher does in order to be passable?

No, I think it looks good. The lighting and art direction are great.

So do the environments. The only thing I didn't care for was the main character model
 
Wonder if Bethesda will replace VATS with the bullet time mod, shit was so good. Hope they have modding tools right off the bat too.
 
Alright, here's what I have to say, and then I'm out of this thread.

First off, graphics are eh, though major props to Beth for not putting out a CG trailer or beating around the bush with their shortcomings. I think the lighting looks pretty good and I dig that color palette. People complaining have a right to complain, people defending likewise. They're clearly not "last gen" (maybe last gen on PC) but they're also not mindblowing. They're dead fucking average, which is completely unsurprising given the scale of the game being shown and Bethesda's track record. The animations (regardless of how shitty the dog's texture/shading work was, the tongue and tracking animation came off as waaaaay better than anything I've seen them do before) look much better than in previous Gamebryo Beth titles, but they're still a far cry from world class. Whatever, I'll play the shit out of it, for the simple reason that I can't (and might never be able to) get this exact sort of experience anywhere else.

When another company can do EXACTLY what Bethesda does and better, I'll abandon them in a hot second. But no other company has done exactly what Bethesda does and better. Some do certain aspects better, mindblowingly better at times, but never the whole shebang. What Bethesda does, and what is my crack, is make huge-ass, enormously detailed open world first person RPG games that let you be whoever the fuck you want to be, that let you steal and throw around every single object that isn't nailed down, that have decent main quests and a fuckton of damn great, non repetitive (until you run out and the Radiant system kicks in, but that's only a problem after 200 hours or so, so whatever) side quests, that don't litter your map with question marks and side activities every ten feet and incentivize exploration with world design alone, that have great lore, that have huge expansive interior dungeons that (while they are admittedly pretty goddamn repetitive) usually have interesting details and implied backstories that always make the journeys worth it, that has endless modding potential and that take place in the postapocalypse half the time. Yes, their combat is invariably shit. Yes, their animations are creaky and bugs are lurking in every nook and cranny. But NO ONE ELSE does what they do, and that's why I can't quit them.

Witcher 3 is a fucking amazing game; it's got the most beautiful and realized open world this side of GTA, with awesome writing and great characters. However, it's third person, the interior areas are typically small, the "use detective, er, witcher vision to do the thing" mechanic got old real fast, the main character is a set person with not much wiggle room for serious roleplaying, and I can't throw a cabbage off a roof and watch it roll down a hill. It does so many things astronomically better than Bethesda could ever hope to achieve, but it doesn't tick all the boxes. I need all of the boxes ticked, dammit.

Dying Light looks damn fine, is set in the postapocalypse, is first person, has that cool environmental storytelling stuff, and has great melee combat (from what I've seen...haven't had the cash to pick it up yet). But it's a goddamn zombie game with a set main character with poor lore and a not particularly interesting looking open world. I'm so FUCKING BORED with zombie games. Also, I can't throw an empty bottle into a canyon and watch it clatter down the rocks and plop into a lake at the bottom. For fucking shame.

Dragon Age Inquisition has a completely mutable main character, with tons of options and dialogue choices. Everything else however...woof. You definitely can't put a bucket over someone's head and steal their entire shop inventory, that's for damn sure.

Kingdom Come: Deliverance might do it. I'm hopeful. Bethesda NEEDS direct competition so they can actually be pushed to do better. But even if it surpasses everything the Elder Scrolls games do (which it won't anyway, since once again you're playing a set character and you bet your ass there aren't going to be cabbage physics), there isn't going to be a Kingdom Come: Postapocalypse any time soon, so I'll inevitably have to come crawling back to Bethesda and suck long and hard at the old Fallout honeydick. Gotta have that postapoc, son.

It's a travesty that Bethesda still can't get their combat act together (fingers foolishly crossed for this one) and that they keep hobbling along with whatever version of Gamebryo their tech team has spawned this time, but everything else fits together to make such compelling, beautifully messy worlds, with so much potential for exploration and roleplaying and having a fucking awesome time existing. I really, REALLY wish someone else could do exactly what they do and dial it up several big notches, but no one's really stepped up to the plate yet. But as far as I know, no one else does (and if someone else does, PLEASE TELL ME). Until that changes, I'll first in line at every midnight launch (figuratively speaking, since I'll DEFINITELY be getting this digitally).
 
You mean to tell me an open-world Bethesda game isn't top of the line graphically? I am simply stunned by this development. Fallout 3/New Vegas certainly didn't look like low end PS2 games, or anything.

Y'all coming to the wrong franchise to be counting triangles.

I'm so god damn excited.
 
Well, perhaps because Bethesda should have the budget of god and are apparently doing very little with it graphically?

I mean, I have no problem playing indie games with "objectively" much worse graphics, but I'm also a bit miffed.

Fallout 3 was pretty ugly compared to it's contemporaries.
 
Damn the dog looks weird without hairworks. I have played Witcher 3 way too much.

Funnily enough, dogs look like crap in The Witcher 3 too.

But yeah that trailer was underwhelming as hell. And yeah I think it looks like a last gen game, doesn't it mean it's not going to be a good game so bite me.
 
I don't understand this post.

"This game better not let me play with a friend if I want to!"

I think their point is that Fallout games, and Bethesda RPGs in general, are grand single-player experiences. The fear being that shoehorning multiplayer into the game would water down the overall package.
 
What immediately stood out to me in the trailer is that none of the items in the game cast any shadows. It looks awful. The texturing is offensively low res. It's hilariously ugly compared to Witcher 3.

I don't really notice AO during gameplay, but its absence is very apparent in screenshots.

I like how this is pretty much the standard excuse for any kind of criticism people can throw at bethesda.

"lol we know it sucks but there will be mods".

They aren't wrong though.

I have no idea how people play Bethesda games on consoles.
 
Say what you will about the technical prowess of Bethesda, I'm so glad they decided to move away from the gritty, muddy aesthetic of the last two. The piss filter is dead at last.
 
Top Bottom