malek4980 said:
Did you think that through? Those are the only two fucking options.
And, anyway, no one works for the minimum by choice. "No, I'd rather earn less. No the minimum is enough--put your money away."
No. You can still not want to and have other options and still need to do it. One of my former co-workers for instance has a Masters in Chemistry but went to work for minimum wage part-time after her daughter was born. She has other options, and doesn't really want to work there because it's a shitty minimum wage job. She just happens to do so because staying at home is lonely and somewhere is just as good as anywhere.
malek4980 said:
Do you not believe in progressive tax rates? Do you think people who can barely make any money should be paying the same rates as the rich?
Tuition deductions, child benefits, and old age deductions are not just available to minimum wage earners.
Only if they cry about how they are entitled to additional benefits, that are arbitrarily decided upon. For instance as indicated before, why should waiters get it and check-out sales people don't?
The deductions may not be solely available to minimum wage earners, but minimum wage earners are the ones who can reduce it to a point where they pay no taxes, or put themselves into a refund position quite easily.
malek4980 said:
Maybe the federal and provincial governments provide these benefits, which you're greatly exaggerating, because employers don't provide them with living wages.
Actually, these benefits tend to be accorded based on political lobby groups and party platforms. The minimum wages were designed so that employers had provincial guidelines to follow, and that the number of electorate pissed off at the government for not doing anything would be relatively low.
malek4980 said:
And is your expectation that everyone will peruse a higher education? Is this a reasonable expectation to have for every single person? No it's not. Some people may not be university material or they rather work with their hands. If they work hard, why should they be throw under the bus?
They should. It's the one key factor in significantly improving their economic well being. If they aren't for higher education, then there is always a skilled trade, which arguably also needs some certification.
If you want to be an economic loser, don't complain about ending up as one.
malek4980 said:
This is you being circular once again. Why do you think people who earn less spend less?
Not everyone gets to choose the situation they're in.
I was pointing out that by spending less, people on minimum wage have less taxes to pay. People who earn more in Canada pay more at the Federal, Provincial and Municipal level than those on minimum wage. They earn more and pay more to subsidize your benefits. There is no reason they should be paying certain people more because those people feel they deserve it, all while other jobs get shafted.
I also deride the idea that because you're in a situation, that you can't dig yourself out. The idea that you ended up in a particular situation because you had no choice sounds to me like a pathetic, fatalistic excuse. My parents spent most of what they had just traveling
to Canada, and they worked from negative equity to well over a million in what... 19 years? Amazingly easy to do in a country like Canada, provided someone isn't inept or lazy.