Video shows FSU QB throwing a punch at a woman at a bar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because you're dumb to reality.

Ok great. I do see her shift to the left a bit and then he pushes against her back with his shoulder. It really is impossible for any of us to tell if he is pushing or she is. I just believe from what I saw that he is pushing. Doesn't make anyone dumb.
 
They're the "good guys," remember? Hahaha.

Their valiant keyboard defending of this drunk maidens honor will be rewarded in Interet Nirvana or something.

Hang on, was she drunk?
 
The thing is, going by the gifs I would have said she started it, but watching the video, there's a good 10 seconds of him pushing against her constantly even though you can see she feels uncomfortable and is trying to push him away. Then there's several seconds of him grabbing her arm that has the handbag on it (i'm pointing this out because that's the reason her arm was in that position) and pushing her before she lashes out, which is pretty damn understandable. Grabbing someone like that is not warranted just because they feel weird about you being pressed up against them. You can also so obviously see her saying "hey hey hey get off" which just looks like she's trying to calm him down.

I do see her leg move out, but even so he has like absolutely no reaction to that, if she did kick him? Maybe he has balls of steel and she actually did, but it just looks like he's using that as a reason to act like a dick and get away with it. Overall, it seems like she was a bit aggy, but there is absolutely no reason to fucking K.O her like that.
 
If this had been a guy-on-guy confrontation, this wouldn't even have been turned into a thread.

The fact that it's twenty-four-fucking-pages and counting is ridiculous.

Too much latent sexism.

The patriarchy has ingrained in our heads that women are to be set aside and protected from the violence inbred into men.

This issue is clearly one of sexism.
 
They're the "good guys," remember? Hahaha.

Their valiant keyboard defending of this drunk maidens honor will be rewarded in Interet Nirvana or something.

Both of these people are kinda trash and defending either one is a lost cause.

It seems like he's owned up to it though.
 
Whether or not he was pushing against her is irrelevant. She started everything by assaulting him, unless you consider trying to push past someone at a bar assault. I think he was justified in punching her back, even though it wasn't the best course of action (better to just walk away)
 
Look at the pic I posted. You can see what I believe is the thumb on his right hand on her left breast. Then watch the video you can see the thumb appear and her shirt gets pulled forward. At 20 to 21 secs. Right after that she punches him.

I'm going to watch it frame by frame again and take shots, but so far I'm not seeing his hand specifically groping her breast.
 
Oh, snap. Just heard on sportsradio there is a witness saying the woman used a racial slur towards him.

GAFs protection of women vs hate for racism, fight.

VaQt0mu.gif
 
In Belgian Criminal law we have a term called "uitlokking" which roughly translates to "incitement".

He clearly didn't start anything, both were intoxicated, she initiated the violence by raising her first, kneeing him and then punching him.
In his defence I would argue self defence (allthough the DA could easily argue disproportional force), and incitement, her actions alone caused this to happen, most drunk men in the same cicrcumstances would act the same.
That would be my defence, if I were his attorny and if it were in Belgium.

But yeah, I don't condone violence. Especially against women. So if I could choose I'd be on the other side trying to get a conviction.

I know nothing about Belgian law, but I'm almost certainly sure being drunk is not a defence in Belgium.

Even in Civil systems there is a version of the reasonable person doctrine, and being drunk is usually per se unreasonable. He's also underage, and that would doubly count against him. The question then becomes - if he was sober what would the reasonable person would have done in that situation?

Legalistically speaking I think it would be hard to argue that a reasonable person who happened to be a college football player in the top division of college football would be able to find a justification for punching a girl like this. His job is to take hits daily from people much larger than himself, and if he can withstand that then he should be able to withstand the awkward blows of a dumpy party girl. Instinct isn't an excuse either because reasonable people use critical thinking not raw emotion by definition (hence the "reason" part).
 
Whether or not he was pushing against her is irrelevant. She started everything by assaulting him, unless you consider trying to push past someone at a bar assault. I think he was justified in punching her back, even though it wasn't the best course of action (better to just walk away)

It's not irrelevant if his intentional pushing/touching is considered battery and her reaction one of self-defense.
 
And all she was doing was fighting his male privilege with her fist.

We can all play these silly games. Bottom line is, don't hit people.
It's weird how we on the "no one hit anyone, but consequences if you do" side are trying to be turned into some "it's okay to hit women" constituency.
It's not irrelevant if his intentional pushing/touching is considered battery and her reaction one of self-defense.
If what initially takes place in that video is considered battery, the we better shut down every bar and club in America. Come on. It's not battery. Just stop.

And she's still pushing backward against him.
 
They are both in the wrong. I don't get why so many people are on one side or the other. They are both the victims and the aggressors. They both could of handled the situation and they both should be at fault and have charges pressed against them if any chargers are filled.

Was he was trying to get a spot at the bar that was too small for him? Yup it looks like it. Does that mean it's ok for her to allegedly throw racial slurs at him and start a physical confrontation? No. And him being the obviously physically stronger person, could he have done a better de-escalating the situation? Yes. Did she deserve to get clocked like that for her actions? No. But people can't expect no matter what gender, size, race, or whatever, to be able to physically try assault another person without some sort of repercussion. And that statement goes to both of them.

And by the way, I do think he is a douche for punching her like that. But she isn't no saint that got attacked by some big black football player.
 
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.



As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?

If someone yells "No!" twice and tries to fend someone off, that doesn't sound like she's inciting this.
 
And all she was doing was fighting his male privilege with her fist.

We can all play these silly games. Bottom line is, don't hit people.

I just don't think it's sexist to say women are generally weaker than men. Especially this drunk chick and this former starting QB.

And what she deserved is irrelevant in this case when he lost his scholarship over it. He should have shown some restraint because he had way more to lose, and then did.
 
Everybody keeps talking about how he "knocked her out" and how disproportionate his punch was compared to hers (which came first btw), but she just stands there and takes it like it's not that big a deal. Given that he is a male athlete I have to assume he pulled back on it.
 
I just don't think it's sexist to say women are generally weaker than men. Especially this drunk chick and this former starting QB.

And what she deserved is irrelevant in this case when he lost his scholarship over it. He should have shown some restraint because he had way more to lose, and then did.

Has it been confirmed she was drunk?
 
I was assaulted by a girl once. She punched me right in the eye. Needless to say I was very unhappy and was extremely close to throwing back. But I restrained myself. The simple fact is the guy could have done the same, but I don't blame him much for feeling the need to strike back. Indeed if this was a two guys, there would not be a thread about this, and the guy would still be on the team most likely. She was the aggressor. Why does the fact that she's a woman make this special? Every person should to be treated equally. But some people don't want that when that equality suddenly is not in their favor.
 
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.



As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?
This is bullshit. He is trying to squeeze by the larger woman, the same woman that the white chick also bumped against in a similar fashion and again there was no problem.
 
But do you see the part I am talking about. Is that not is thumb in the pic I posted?

It's too hard to tell. There are like 5 different arms in the shot and it's impossible to know if it's specifically his thumb, but even if it is, I'm not sure that can be called groping if he's attempting to push her away and his thumb accidentally touches her breast.

Has she made allegations of groping?
 
I was assaulted by a girl once. She punched me right in the eye. Needless to say I was very unhappy and was extremely close to throwing back. But I restrained myself. The simple fact is the guy could have done the same, but I don't blame him much for feeling the need to strike back. Indeed if this was a two guys, there would not be a thread about this, and the guy would still be on the team most likely. She was the aggressor. Why does the fact that she's a woman make this special? Every person should to be treated equally. But some people don't want that when that equality suddenly is not in their favor.

But it didn't hurt because girls are weak like children.
 
That affidavit is worded interestingly. The actions of the victim are described as "attempted strikes" while the defendant's are labeled as "punches". I don't see any attempts in what the girl did, she clearly punched him - whether a weak punch or not. At the end of the day, I chalk this up to two drunk teenagers not handling a situation properly.
 
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.



As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?

In complete agreement.
 
why is there a debate here? more reddit no maam members? my lord. yea you get hit by a woman, you walk away, or throw a drink in her face. thats about it.

lots of weak egos here that cant stand it that women vs men physical violence is a double standard in the eyes of ______. this a battle worth fighting? justifying punching a woman? kicked in the balls? fall down. get help. now if any of that was done by someone who would realistically be a physical threat, have at it.

what traumas have you all been through that justifies punching a woman? happen before? there should be no problem admitting it, tis is ok.


I can't tell if this guy is being serious or if this is some kind of sneaky back-handed attack on women and there physical prowess
 
It's weird how we on the "no one hit anyone, but consequences if you do" side are trying to be turned into some "it's okay to hit women" constituency.

Yeah. I haven't seen anyone saying that it's ok to hit women, but that's what our position is being twisted into. It's a double standard, and it's wrong.

I just don't think it's sexist to say women are generally weaker than men. Especially this drunk chick and this former starting QB.

That's a generalization, and is included in some definitions of sexism. Certainly what many posters are arguing here, that the fact that this woman initiated the exchange by throwing the first punch is irrelevant because she is a woman and her target is a man, THAT is clearly sexism.

And what she deserved is irrelevant in this case when he lost his scholarship over it. He should have shown some restraint because he had way more to lose, and then did.

I'm not saying what she deserved or didn't, though she should be charged with assault. I do agree about him having more to lose, though. But when someone is assaulting you, it can be hard to show restraint, and he made a split-second decision (which was a costly one).
 
So what's the play by play?

Dude tries to force himself closer to the bar, physically pushing up against the woman who refuses to move?

Then she raises a fist, they both try to restrain each other, groin kick, racial slur, punch to the face? Is that the order of things?
 
It's too hard to tell. There are like 5 different arms in the shot and it's impossible to know if it's specifically his thumb, but even if it is, I'm not sure that can be called groping if he's attempting to push her away and his thumb accidentally touches her breast.

Has she made allegations of groping?

No idea if she did. May have been an accident on his part. No way to know. She did hit him right after that so maybe that is what triggered it.
 
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.

As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?

Nope. Nope, nope, nope.

He doesn't even notice her until after she turns and gets his attention and even then he just ignores her as he's trying to get to the bar.

You're seeing what you want to see, not what's actually happening.

8xv7u6F.png

XK0q3TO.png

cQXcN3W.png

ny2WpGZ.png

2h2UOHh.png

WAkTbiG.png


In fact, he hardly seems to be touching her after the girl to his left leaves the shot.

In complete agreement.

I'm shocked. Positively shocked.
 
Unfortunately, he's 100% serious.

And it's becoming sad.

Even if he was pushing her (which is not what it appears on camera) it doesn't require a response that includes putting your forearm on someone's chest with a fist clinched threatening them, throwing racial slurs, kneeing them in the groin, and throwing a punch.
 
Now that I'm on the computer as opposed to the phone and watch bigger and slower, anyone else notice that she walks up already holding a drink, then sets it down before raising her fist?

I thought that and the ostrich neck move at the start were funny.

I'm looking at this without gender as a part of it, and this is a non-story...One person threw a weak punch first, one person threw a strong punch after. Any incidental pushing doesn't seem strong enough to be perceived as assault or escalation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom