Yea, because she was about to go HAM on him.
You know, drunk people do stupid shit and you never know who you're dealing with at a bar.
Hmmm...
Yea, because she was about to go HAM on him.
You know, drunk people do stupid shit and you never know who you're dealing with at a bar.
Because you're dumb to reality.
They're the "good guys," remember? Hahaha.
Their valiant keyboard defending of this drunk maidens honor will be rewarded in Interet Nirvana or something.
Hahahahahaha.Oh, snap. Just heard on sportsradio there is a witness saying the woman used a racial slur towards him.
GAFs protection of women vs hate for racism, fight.
If this had been a guy-on-guy confrontation, this wouldn't even have been turned into a thread.
The fact that it's twenty-four-fucking-pages and counting is ridiculous.
Too much latent sexism.
They're the "good guys," remember? Hahaha.
Their valiant keyboard defending of this drunk maidens honor will be rewarded in Interet Nirvana or something.
Look at the pic I posted. You can see what I believe is the thumb on his right hand on her left breast. Then watch the video you can see the thumb appear and her shirt gets pulled forward. At 20 to 21 secs. Right after that she punches him.
Oh, snap. Just heard on sportsradio there is a witness saying the woman used a racial slur towards him.
GAFs protection of women vs hate for racism, fight.
All he was doing was respecting her equality with his fist. Got it.
In Belgian Criminal law we have a term called "uitlokking" which roughly translates to "incitement".
He clearly didn't start anything, both were intoxicated, she initiated the violence by raising her first, kneeing him and then punching him.
In his defence I would argue self defence (allthough the DA could easily argue disproportional force), and incitement, her actions alone caused this to happen, most drunk men in the same cicrcumstances would act the same.
That would be my defence, if I were his attorny and if it were in Belgium.
But yeah, I don't condone violence. Especially against women. So if I could choose I'd be on the other side trying to get a conviction.
Whether or not he was pushing against her is irrelevant. She started everything by assaulting him, unless you consider trying to push past someone at a bar assault. I think he was justified in punching her back, even though it wasn't the best course of action (better to just walk away)
It's weird how we on the "no one hit anyone, but consequences if you do" side are trying to be turned into some "it's okay to hit women" constituency.And all she was doing was fighting his male privilege with her fist.
We can all play these silly games. Bottom line is, don't hit people.
If what initially takes place in that video is considered battery, the we better shut down every bar and club in America. Come on. It's not battery. Just stop.It's not irrelevant if his intentional pushing/touching is considered battery and her reaction one of self-defense.
I'm going to watch it frame by frame again and take shots, but so far I'm not seeing his hand specifically groping her breast.
In Star Trek terms, the hit should've been at impulse power instead of warp factor 5.What's the usual threshold though?
If someone punches you, you punch back right? Up to what point?
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.
As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?
And all she was doing was fighting his male privilege with her fist.
We can all play these silly games. Bottom line is, don't hit people.
I just don't think it's sexist to say women are generally weaker than men. Especially this drunk chick and this former starting QB.
And what she deserved is irrelevant in this case when he lost his scholarship over it. He should have shown some restraint because he had way more to lose, and then did.
This is bullshit. He is trying to squeeze by the larger woman, the same woman that the white chick also bumped against in a similar fashion and again there was no problem.After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.
As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?
But do you see the part I am talking about. Is that not is thumb in the pic I posted?
I was assaulted by a girl once. She punched me right in the eye. Needless to say I was very unhappy and was extremely close to throwing back. But I restrained myself. The simple fact is the guy could have done the same, but I don't blame him much for feeling the need to strike back. Indeed if this was a two guys, there would not be a thread about this, and the guy would still be on the team most likely. She was the aggressor. Why does the fact that she's a woman make this special? Every person should to be treated equally. But some people don't want that when that equality suddenly is not in their favor.
Has it been confirmed she was drunk?
Oh, snap. Just heard on sportsradio there is a witness saying the woman used a racial slur towards him.
GAFs protection of women vs hate for racism, fight.
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.
As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?
Have you seen that video or any of those GIFs? Have you seen a drunk college girl?Has it been confirmed she was drunk?
why is there a debate here? more reddit no maam members? my lord. yea you get hit by a woman, you walk away, or throw a drink in her face. thats about it.
lots of weak egos here that cant stand it that women vs men physical violence is a double standard in the eyes of ______. this a battle worth fighting? justifying punching a woman? kicked in the balls? fall down. get help. now if any of that was done by someone who would realistically be a physical threat, have at it.
what traumas have you all been through that justifies punching a woman? happen before? there should be no problem admitting it, tis is ok.
It's weird how we on the "no one hit anyone, but consequences if you do" side are trying to be turned into some "it's okay to hit women" constituency.
I just don't think it's sexist to say women are generally weaker than men. Especially this drunk chick and this former starting QB.
And what she deserved is irrelevant in this case when he lost his scholarship over it. He should have shown some restraint because he had way more to lose, and then did.
He escalated it by clocking her
Unfortunately, he's 100% serious.Not sure if serious
It's OK, she is a drunk 70 yr old child.I dont know how to feel
It's too hard to tell. There are like 5 different arms in the shot and it's impossible to know if it's specifically his thumb, but even if it is, I'm not sure that can be called groping if he's attempting to push her away and his thumb accidentally touches her breast.
Has she made allegations of groping?
After getting some rest and watching the video again (this time full-screen), it's more apparent to me that he was being quite forceful against her back when trying to make space to get into the bar area. You can see him pushing his shoulder into her and leaning in with some pressure using the underside of the table to anchor himself in. She's already in a tight spot against the table and you can see her stomach pushing in and her back arching, then springing back once the pressure is gone after she turns around to complain. As someone who frequents packed shows, it's easy to push up against someone with a lot of pressure when there's little space without it looking like you're trying to ram into them. Applying my own experiences, I can imagine the amount of force being used in this instance and it falls in line with what's in the affidavit.
As I mentioned previously, I'm not entirely absolving her of the threatening motion/reaction as it could have been handled differently for certain, but if we look at why she was upset enough to tell the guy to back off with that gesture, it's more difficult to say she caused the provocation and was the instigator without any further evidence. I think it's fair to complain if someone is applying force against you from behind and isn't letting up. If my analysis and the affidavit are correct and he was intentionally applying force/unwanted contact, would her reaction be one of self-defense? Would it be legally justified in your mind?
In complete agreement.
But it didn't hurt because girls are weak like children.
Unfortunately, he's 100% serious.
I wish your valiant efforts wouldn't fall upon blind eyes, deaf ears, and futile brains.[All the evidence in the world that stupid people in this thread and the law will willfully ignore.]
Based on the video how could you ever consider that battery??It's not irrelevant if his intentional pushing/touching is considered battery and her reaction one of self-defense.
KI'm shocked. Positively shocked.
I wish your valiant efforts wouldn't fall upon blind eyes, deaf ears, and futile brains.
It's not irrelevant if his intentional pushing/touching is considered battery and her reaction one of self-defense.