Seahawks and Russell Wilson agreed to an extension (4 years, $87.6mil)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shouldn't have fired Worst Harbs!

I wish he were still there, Niners-Hawks games were great.

yeah they were great... nothing like watching your coach wanting to wait till the last second to snap the ball EVERYTIME....only for the opposing defense to get a good jump on the ball, for some strange reason. And don't forget about Gore up the middle 100% of the time.

man we were so unpredictable, I don't know how Sherm and them can say they knew our plays.
 
You have to be pretty damn naive if you thought he wasn't gonna get paid like this considering Cam got over 20 million a year. The colts fucked up by not renegotiating Lucks contract this year, he has to be salivating at the mouth LOL.
 
Where is kas? Didn't he insist this wasn't going to happen because it would have happened already? Error.
 
You have to be pretty damn naive if you thought he wasn't gonna get paid like this considering Cam got over 20 million a year. The colts fucked up by not renegotiating Lucks contract this year, he has to be salivating at the mouth LOL.

Luck was never doing a new deal until this one was done.
 
Wrong wrong wrong.

thats not glancing...he knocked the guy off his route if thats ok , no one will play pass defense ever again because you wont need to. Over the back pass defense would be ok....he hit him before the ball and knocked him off his route that kind of hit is ok AFTER the receiver has touched the ball he hadn't yet which is key.
 
Speaking of Luck, what the hell is going on in 2016? He has a random 16 Million in year 5 of a 4 year deal. I'm confused.

yyXXhz3.png

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/indianapolis-colts/andrew-luck/
 
How sad will you be when the Rams give Nick Foles nearly as much? ;)

Nick Foles won't make as much as Bradford did, so I am good. Besides, Mannion is our QB of the future so I have no idea what you are even talking about.

On a side note, as much as I like Sherman, Wilson's "aw shucks" shtick is getting old. Congratulations guy, you aren't having sex with Ciara and you thought it was important we all know about it.

God told you to "lead her" or whatever the fuck you are on about.
 
thats not glancing...he knocked the guy off his route if thats ok , no one will play pass defense ever again because you wont need to. Over the back pass defense would be ok....he hit him before the ball and knocked him off his route that kind of hit is ok AFTER the receiver has touched the ball he hadn't yet which is key.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/video/pereira-malcolm-butler-s-interception-was-not-pass-interference-020115?vid=392194115523


Listen to this, the defender has equal right to the path of the ball.

unless the defender has turned his head to face the oncoming pass and is attempting to intercept it.

It wasn't pass interference. Nobody has ever argued it, and for good reason.

You're the only one who thinks its PI
 
unless the defender has turned his head to face the oncoming pass and is attempting to intercept it.

It wasn't pass interference. Nobody has ever argued it, and for good reason.

You're the only one who thinks its PI

looking at the pass will not get you off the hook that would make defending too easy it would allow contact just because of the intention of going for an interception. One rule is enforceable all the time, you cannot contact (knock a receiver off his route post 5yds) the receiver in a route unless they have contact with the ball. The other is arbitrary " unless the defender has turned his head to face an on..." lol read that bullshit. The NFL isn't perfect and neither is the officiating or rules committee. If that much contact is ok in pass defense then journeyman cb's are about to go to the probowl. The play made is absolutely fine if the WR has the tip of his fingers on that ball. Whats close is he doesn't , from the other angle it's hard to tell so you give it the benefit of the doubt. From the other angle its clearly contact before the ball is touched by the offensive player. I'm sure every defensive player in the league wishes it was called that way but it wont be and it will get flagged.
 
looking at the pass will not get you off the hook that would make defending too easy it would allow contact just because of the intention of going for an interception. One rule is enforceable all the time, you cannot contact (knock a receiver off his route post 5yds) the receiver in a route unless they have contact with the ball. The other is arbitrary " unless the defender has turned his head to face an on..." lol read that bullshit. The NFL isn't perfect and neither is the officiating or rules committee. If that much contact is ok in pass defense then journeyman cb's are about to go to the probowl. The play made is absolutely fine if the WR has the tip of his fingers on that ball. Whats close is he doesn't , from the other angle it's hard to tell so you give it the benefit of the doubt. From the other angle its clearly contact before the ball is touched by the offensive player. I'm sure every defensive player in the league wishes it was called that way but it wont be and it will get flagged.

ok you clearly don't understand pass interference so I'm just going to end it here. If you don't want to listen to Mike Pereira, a former American football official and later Vice President of Officiating for the National Football League, then that's your issue.

Defender gets equal right to the ball, you're living in a fantasy land trying to argue PI
 
Perfect pass, great defensive play. I would fault the receiver if anyone for thinking the middle would be uncontested.
The receiver doesn't choose where to go. He has a set running route. It would be the QB's fault for throwing it there despite the fact that there were multiple defenders covering the area.
 
Jesus.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little salty at the idea of not just an athlete, but just about anyone, getting paid this amount of money per year short of being an inventor of a miracle drug that cures all forms of cancer and heart disease or something.

But hey, good for him. I guess they wouldn't be paying him that much if they didn't think he generated at least that much potential equity for their team.
 
even I as a Bills fan, an avowed enemy of the Patriots, thinks that was a clean and all time defensive play. If they would've called PI on that play it would've been a joke. Butler clearly made a play on the ball.
 
Jesus.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little salty at the idea of not just an athlete, but just about anyone, getting paid this amount of money per year short of being an inventor of a miracle drug that cures all forms of cancer and heart disease or something.

But hey, good for him. I guess they wouldn't be paying him that much if they didn't think he generated at least that much potential equity for their team.
Money isn't in cures, it's in "treatments." Who do you think would make more money, a guy that creates a cure for erectile dysfunction or a guy that creates a pill that temporarily helps with it? Pro athlete salaries are going up in all sports. If that bothers you now, then 10 years from now you're gonna go insane.
 
Jesus.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little salty at the idea of not just an athlete, but just about anyone, getting paid this amount of money per year short of being an inventor of a miracle drug that cures all forms of cancer and heart disease or something.

But hey, good for him. I guess they wouldn't be paying him that much if they didn't think he generated at least that much potential equity for their team.

Wait until you see what Andrew Luck gets paid.

Or what any all-star baseball player gets paid
 
looking at the pass will not get you off the hook that would make defending too easy it would allow contact just because of the intention of going for an interception. One rule is enforceable all the time, you cannot contact (knock a receiver off his route post 5yds) the receiver in a route unless they have contact with the ball. The other is arbitrary " unless the defender has turned his head to face an on..." lol read that bullshit. The NFL isn't perfect and neither is the officiating or rules committee. If that much contact is ok in pass defense then journeyman cb's are about to go to the probowl. The play made is absolutely fine if the WR has the tip of his fingers on that ball. Whats close is he doesn't , from the other angle it's hard to tell so you give it the benefit of the doubt. From the other angle its clearly contact before the ball is touched by the offensive player. I'm sure every defensive player in the league wishes it was called that way but it wont be and it will get flagged.
A Seahawks fan crying about how Pass Interference cost them a game, how rich!
 
The real surprise is the guaranteed money. Outside of that, his deal will be eclipsed by the next couple bug QB extensions. Eli, Luck, etc all stand to get bigger money totals.
 
It's not like they had a choice, teams are having to way overpay for QBs since Flacco got his mega deal.

Yup QBs dont grow on trees, if you have a good QB you better keep him and pay him.

Its funny when people act like Wilson is some scrub on a super talented team

100 passer rating his 1st 2 years 95 year 3
over 20 TDs and 10 or less ints first 3 years
Over 3,000 yards first 3 years
over 400 - 800 rushing yards those 3 years
Over 63% completion those 3 years
Plus the team also went to 2 Super bowl visits and 1 ring

Show me another QB that can claim those stats in there first 3 years, you cant
Not Brees, Brady, Rodgers, Big Ben or Luck
 
4 years is a lifetime in the NFL. If for some reason he becomes a super bust in these 4 years, they are fucked for awhile. His cap number is going to be a killer these next 4 years.

I cant think of 1 QB to be that good in there first 3 years and all of a sudden become terrible, (outside of a major injury) in the history of the NFL.

QBs can play til late 30's, yea they have some down years, but major bust I just never seen it before.
 
I cant think of 1 QB to be that good in there first 3 years and all of a sudden become terrible, (outside of a major injury) in the history of the NFL.

QBs can play til late 30's, yea they have some down years, but major bust I just never seen it before.

Oh, I can think of one.

54LQoBM.jpg
 
Dude wasn't even talking to you, looks like his post got you in your feelings
9NW2yWG.png

Just commenting on the irony. Its too sweet to let go.

Though for your teams sake I hope the Seahawks defense can match the defense force of their fans long term, because you all just paid Rodgers money to a tier 2 quarterback.... Have fun with that.
 
Just commenting on the irony. Its too sweet to let go.

Though for your teams sake I hope the Seahawks defense can match the defense force of their fans, because you all just paid Rodgers money to a tier 2 quarterback.... Have fun with that.

Nah. Guaranteed money it's Rodgers-tier, per-year it's not (it's 8th for QBs IIRC).

I will have fun with that, definitely more fun than the Saints will be having with their tier 1 QB ;)
 
looking at the pass will not get you off the hook that would make defending too easy it would allow contact just because of the intention of going for an interception. One rule is enforceable all the time, you cannot contact (knock a receiver off his route post 5yds) the receiver in a route unless they have contact with the ball. The other is arbitrary " unless the defender has turned his head to face an on..." lol read that bullshit. The NFL isn't perfect and neither is the officiating or rules committee. If that much contact is ok in pass defense then journeyman cb's are about to go to the probowl. The play made is absolutely fine if the WR has the tip of his fingers on that ball. Whats close is he doesn't , from the other angle it's hard to tell so you give it the benefit of the doubt. From the other angle its clearly contact before the ball is touched by the offensive player. I'm sure every defensive player in the league wishes it was called that way but it wont be and it will get flagged.

You're wrong. Just read. It's not that long: http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterference

I can quote the relevant parts:

Actions that do not constitute pass interference include but are not limited to:

(e) Contact by a defender who has gained position on a receiver in an attempt to catch the ball.

Note 2: Defensive players have as much right to the path of the ball as eligible offensive players.
 
Nah. Guaranteed money it's Rodgers-tier, per-year it's not (it's 8th for QBs IIRC).

I will have fun with that, definitely more fun than the Saints will be having with their tier 1 QB ;)

I know what my team is, an 8-8 team at best with at least one more season of growing pains if not longer. The problem with this sort of shit talking is it presumes the other person is an irrational fanboy like they are, thats the only way these weak jabs ever work.

Have fun with that slow slide to mediocrity though. Spend less time trying to shit talk others and enjoy it, because once those defensive contracts come up and Lynch is gone in a year or two, all you will have is a tier 2 quarterback at 21 million a year and a lot of nostalgia to wrap yourself in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom