Kotaku flops hard on Japanese sales comprehension

zeopower6

Member
Anime Blu-Ray sales are roughly tracked somehow on Amazon.jp so I wonder if their source used the same system...?
 
So this is a thread about a kotaku article that says devils third bombed based on a chart that doesnt include amazon.co.jp sales. Yet the game is amazon.co.jp exclusive meaning that dengenki cant track it at all

What is this thread?
 

lherre

Accurate
If Dengeki doesn't track Amazon.co.jp then the article is a bit pointless.

Anyone knows if Dengekit tracks it? I suppose the answer is "no" since MC and Famitsu doesn't track it.
 

Tempy

don't ask me for codes
So this is a thread about a kotaku article that says devils third bombed based on a chart that doesnt include amazon.co.jp sales. Yet the game is amazon.co.jp exclusive meaning that dengenki cant track it at all

What is this thread?

I propose turning it into a kotaku gif thread.
 

striferser

Huge Nickleback Fan
Lol that title change.
So yeah, a lesson for any aspiring journalist out there. Check your article fact before you publish it.
 
D

Deleted member 125677

Unconfirmed Member
Great article, Brian Ashcraft!
TadkV.gif
 
Wait Media Create and Famitsu don't track Amazon (I know they track different retailers). I just find it a little strange since chart-track in the UK does (what does NPD do...).

I expect another Kotaku article on a digital only game "flopping hard" although ironically that would actually be tracked eventually (I forget Japan sales age but I seem to remember digital being tracked monthly).

Also I'm reminded of the Greenpeace reports that Nintendo got a F grade due to submitting no data.

I can't believe a game sold worst than W101
W101 was a smash hit compared to Code name STEAM (about 1500 week 1 Japan, 30k month 1 USA, unknown in Europe but Amazon UK robot putting games price into auto free-fall and currently at £13.10 is not a good sign).

*pulls out old spreadsheet* But when it comes to Nintendo bomba you have thinkgs like
Ando Kensaku (an odd quiz game based on google search results)
Bit Generations: Boundish
Bit Generations: Dialhex

Of course you have to look at costs rather than sales numbers and Devil's Tird sure had development hell and flashy big name director. Of course I'm saying that without any sales numbers...
 

DryvBy

Member
Read thread please. There's nothing to compare.

That isn't an answer.

I read through the thread. I remember W101 being called a flop as far as sales and wanted to get an idea if this did worse than W101 in it's first week in Japan.

title update: lol! ok, well there we go. I couldn't read the article because of work.
 
Lvgey6O.gif


I read through the thread. I remember W101 being called a flop as far as sales and wanted to get an idea if this did worse than W101 in it's first week in Japan.

W101 sold over 5k their first week, so based on Kotaku's shit research it did worse than that.
 
Of course you have to look at costs rather than sales numbers and Devil's Tird sure had development hell and flashy big name director. Of course I'm saying that without any sales numbers...

Big question is how much of the development bill Nintendo ended up footing. It was in development hell for ages, but a good chunk of that must have been funded by THQ and then Valhalla themselves. I wonder if Nintendo simply snapped it up and gave them the minimum funding to get it out of the door, in which case - though it's likely still a bomb - it's not quite as expensive for Nintendo as it might look.
 

zeopower6

Member
If sales are not going to be reported through the usual channels, how are sales figures going to be released for this game? ?_?
 
If sales are not going to be reported through the usual channels, how are sales figures going to be released for this game? ?_?

They won't be, unless Nintendo or Valhalla make some kind of announcement - which, given the likely LTD (I'd be surprised if it cracked 10k) is not something I can see...
 
Top Bottom