Why is Hillary guaranteed to win?

Status
Not open for further replies.

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
I don't need to get a beer with Hillary Clinton. She could literally sit in the oval office eating raw goats that she sacrifices to a giant fucking statue for Baphomet that sits over the grave for Vince Foster for all I fucking care as long as she ends up enacting policy that I agree with.

Dont knock Baphomet statues. They are pretty boss.
 

ISOM

Member
If Trump wins the GOP nomination, the Dems need someone just as inflammatory or they are going to lose badly. Joe or Sanders would do. I dont think she has it in her to be an opponent of a populist like Trump.

Trump is appealing to the hard right. That's not populist.
 
If Trump wins the GOP nomination, the Dems need someone just as inflammatory or they are going to lose badly. Joe or Sanders would do. I dont think she has it in her to be an opponent of a populist like Trump.

That's not how it works.

Trump has the highest unelectable rating among candidates basically. Sure, he has a group of people who support him, but they are vastly outnumbered by the number of people who would never, ever consider him as a candidate. He would get swept, it would be a blood bath.
 
If Trump wins the GOP nomination, the Dems need someone just as inflammatory or they are going to lose badly. Joe or Sanders would do. I dont think she has it in her to be an opponent of a populist like Trump.

In what world is Trump a populist?

His entire campaign is based entirely on appealing to people who hate hispanics.That's literally it, he has no policy positions outside of immigration.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
What's Hillary's platform on that?

When a person asks others to explain another candidates major platforms to them, while they are simultaneously cheerleading another candidate, it really says something about the person demanding those answers.
 
In what world is Trump a populist?

His entire campaign is based entirely on appealing to people who hate hispanics.That's literally it, he has no policy positions outside of immigration.

He is the definition of populism. Just right-wing, anti establishment populism.

Europe has plenty of this over the top, anti immigration "populist". UKIP, Marine Le Pen, etc. Specially Marine Le Pen (he is not even 1% as smart as her, though).
 

Amir0x

Banned
Hence why Sanders' goal isn't to simply be elected President, but to embolden Americans who agree with his ideas to organize a long-term grassroots movement that will promote prolonged participation in local and national politics and fight against apathy, cynicism, and the current system at large. Bernie Sanders is well fucking aware of how the political system currently works, and understands that the only way to fix it is for Americans to actively fight against it. Many people think that Americans are inherently or irrevocably complacent and apathetic and that we're either stuck with the current system or can only change it incrementally over a very long period of time. I don't agree with that, and I think that the maturation of the Internet has made Sanders' goal possible.


And this "grassroots movement" is going to do what, precisely, to get over the insane hurdles in Congress? Fix the currently obscenely gerrymandered system, by maybe participating in the Census this time? Burn Congress to the ground?

By what measure is this "grassroots" movement going to actually affect change? By what measure is Bernie "not taking it [from the people]" once he magically becomes president would actually change even the tiniest element of what is actually preventing that change from occurring?

I support many of Bernie's policies. But I actually understand how the political system functions, and I don't think he has remotely made the leap yet to actually figuring out how he would transport that grassroots movement into practical political change.
 
You might as well say she's a stuck up bitch and be done with it.

Right, so me not liking her because she comes off as arrogant has me calling her a bitch? Uh, ok...for the record, you are implying a lot.

You are saying likability matters a great deal to you and I am saying that is an insultingly ignorant way to vet candidates. Then you add this projection you are throwing at Hillary and it comes off even more childish.

Sad to see so many liberals looking worse then Republicans when it comes to evaluating candidates. Superficial metrics over substance. Sums up why America is where it is.

Why can't you want to have both? A likable candidate that also stands for what you want? It doesn't have to be either or. Obama proved that. Hell, the most likable candidate out there isn't even running.

Warren is the best of both worlds, imo.
 
And this "grassroots movement" is going to do what, precisely, to get over the insane hurdles in Congress? Fix the currently obscenely gerrymandered system, by maybe participating in the Census this time? Burn Congress to the ground?

There have actually been multiple Bernie supporters on GAF suggest that Bernie has "crossover appeal" to moderate Republicans.
 
And this "grassroots movement" is going to do what, precisely, to get over the insane hurdles in Congress? Fix the currently obscenely gerrymandered system, by maybe participating in the Census this time? Burn Congress to the ground?

By what measure is this "grassroots" movement going to actually affect change? By what measure is Bernie "not taking it [from the people]" once he magically becomes president would actually change even the tiniest element of what is actually preventing that change from occurring?

I support many of Bernie's policies. But I actually understand how the political system functions, and I don't think he has remotely made the leap yet to actually figuring out how he would transport that grassroots movement into practical political change.

If you're already expecting results, you didn't get the message. /twirl
 

Daria

Member
Bernie does well among white College types and latte sippers who are loud on the internets.

Hillary trounces Bernie among white blue collar workers who outnumber hipsters.

it's a shame those blue collar workers are too busy making a living to get on the Internet and research how much Hilliary has shifted her views over the years to gain popularity.

and lol at people still using the term 'hipster' to describe someone.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
And this "grassroots movement" is going to do what, precisely, to get over the insane hurdles in Congress? Fix the currently obscenely gerrymandered system, by maybe participating in the Census this time? Burn Congress to the ground?

By what measure is this "grassroots" movement going to actually affect change? By what measure is Bernie "not taking it [from the people]" once he magically becomes president would actually change even the tiniest element of what is actually preventing that change from occurring?

I support many of Bernie's policies. But I actually understand how the political system functions, and I don't think he has remotely made the leap yet to actually figuring out how he would transport that grassroots movement into practical political change.

Exactly. Tell me how this grassroots can be counted on in the election below when they were not there in 2010 nor 2014. The next Census will only cover what is white below on the 2nd map with NJ, VA, LA, KY, & MS in odd number years.

350px-United_States_Senate_elections%2C_2018.png


350px-United_States_gubernatorial_elections%2C_2018.png
 

Jonm1010

Banned
Right, so me not liking her because she comes off as arrogant has me calling her a bitch? Uh, ok...for the record, you are implying a lot.



Why can't you want to have both? A likable candidate that also stands for what you want? It doesn't have to be either or. Obama proved that. Hell, the most likable candidate out there isn't even running.

Warren is the best of both worlds, imo.

Warren isn't running. Maybe in 2024 you will get that chance. As for right now you are literally arguing that you will not vote for a candidate because you don't think she does well in the superficial pageant of media likability. You sound worse then a Palin supporter right now. All about image and nothing about substance. To the point you are going to take your ball and go home if she is nominated.
 

rjc571

Banned
Bernie Sanders won't beat her for the democratic nom since he doesn't appeal to moderate democrats, and no republican stands a chance in the general election since their party is so splintered between moderate voters and far-right wing lunatics that it's impossible to appeal to one of these groups without pissing off the other.
 
There are no guarantees and she will of course need to fight really hard like any contender would, but she has a very strong advantage. She's just not so advantaged that she can ignore Bernie's policies.
 
The ground swell for a qualified female president, when all is said and done, will completely overrun whoever her opponent happens to be. Women in this country, as well as many men, want this to happen. Many will also see electing Hillary as the surest way possible to protect President Obama's agenda as well as all the progress that has been made during his two terms as President.

Maybe it's a bit much to say she's guaranteed to win, but she's the heavy favorite to win, and for damn good reason. There isn't another Barack Obama showing up to stop her in this election cycle, not on the Democratic side (although I do love Bernie Sanders), and for damn sure not on the Republican side.
 
GOP candidates are so awful that it's hard to imagine any of them winning. The Democrats could put a pinata against them and it'd probably win.
 

Jobbs

Banned
Anyone who pays attention to politics knows a couple things:

1) Trump will not be the nominee. He'll flame out. Republicans always play footsy with wackos in the early part of the process. Herman Cain was frontrunner for the 2012 nomination for a time. The republicans will end up with an establishment type pick in the end. Someone like Jeb Bush (not sure if it'll be Jeb or not, but it won't be one of the cartoon characters).

2) Hillary is not guaranteed at all to be the nominee. She is the most likely candidate if you look at it now in 2015, but looking at things now in 2015 is completely pointless. You can't forecast politics a year in advance.
 

gogosox82

Member
Several reasons.

  • She has name recognition.
  • She has already shown that she has the ability to raise a ton of money. She will need to raise $1 billion like Obama did in order to win but she's shown that she can do this.
  • The republican base is crazy which is allowing guys like Trump to get a ton attention just by saying something ridiculous. Instead of letting guys that could actually win a general (like Kasich or Rubio). They let Trump get all the airtime which just makes the entire party look clownish.
  • Demographics are such that the Democratic nominee is all but guaranteed the presidency. Democrats don't even need Ohio and Florida anymore to win while Republicans do plus they need an upset somewhere.

Its not a lock because she could always lose but she has the best chance out of everyone running to get the nomination.
 
Anyone who pays attention to politics knows a couple things:

1) Trump will not be the nominee. He'll flame out. Republicans always play footsy with wackos in the early part of the process. Herman Cain was frontrunner for the 2012 nomination for a time. The republicans will end up with an establishment type pick in the end. Someone like Jeb Bush (not sure if it'll be Jeb or not, but it won't be one of the cartoon characters).

2) Hillary is not guaranteed at all to be the nominee. She is the most likely candidate if you look at it now in 2015, but looking at things now in 2015 is completely pointless. You can't forecast politics a year in advance.

...
 
That the voter demographic for 2008 and 2012 isn't radically different. 51-52% are voting democratic, 47% or so are voting republican. Out of these probably 45% on each side are "locked" into their side, they will vote for that party pretty much for every office no matter who the candidate is. I am making up these numbers just based on recollection of past data, but its fairly close. There is definitely at least 70% of the country is locked into one side and will always vote for "their side" no matter what.

and even then the electoral college makes it even harder as more liberal states have more votes.
 

Maengun1

Member
Hillary may or may not be inevitable, and I would vote for her in the general, but the attempts to marginalize Sanders and his supporters as " crazies" does not sit right with me.

Not at all.

If Sander's platform were enacted into law, all it would do would be to bring the U.S. into closer alignment with other countries in terms of the robustness of its safety net.


I see way more Sanders supporters attacking Hillary/Hillary supporters than the reverse. I haven't seen Hillary talk about Sanders at all really actually.

Personally, I like Clinton and Sanders both and think both would be good presidents. I also believe that Sanders will not win the nomination. He's very welcome to run, and I hope he's able to push his message far, but the full-on Sanders supporters bashing Clinton and saying she's not a real liberal, wouldn't ever vote for her, etc.....really annoys me.

Liberals lose when they fight each other.

Anyway, I don't think Clinton is a lock to win the General Election either. She's the favorite, that's all. Things can go wrong. Americans have VERY short memories. Most people just think "my life isn't perfect right now, and a Dem was president for 8 years, TIME FOR A CHANGE!" I just want to make sure we don't end up with another nightmare scenario Republican in the White House in 2017.
 

Biff

Member
You are on an internet forum filled with Bernie Sanders key demo. Of course Bernie is going to appear to have a lot more support with 22 year olds who love people who peddle simple solutions to complex problems and support super-liberal positions that are impossible to enact in the current congress.

This post should be an automatic first-reply to any Bernie thread.
Sometimes it's easy to forget how small and UNrepresentative this forum is of the entire USA.
 

Aaron

Member
The national election is all about demographics. When the Repulican party continues to alienate most of those demos, the Democrats are assured the presidency. Hillary is the front runner right now, but pretty much whoever ends up in the democratic driver's seat is going to walk away with this election. The candidates kind of don't matter.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
politics shouldn't be a contest about who has the biggest dick and most money. never change America

It shouldnt be, and that is why it is insanely important that a Democrat wins the White House.

The best chance this country has at taking money out of politics is through a liberal supreme court and getting political re-districting under control.

If Sanders supporters want to realistically have a socialist be competitive on the national stage they better not get all whiny and take their ball and go home when Sanders likely doesnt get the nomination.

Because Hilary will become their best chance to move toward a system that will give underdog candidates like Sanders a true fighting chance. Because undoing Citizens United through liberal court appointments and being in an advantageous position during the next redistricting process is the best first step true champions of election reform can hope for. Sitting out, voting third party or protest voting should be off the table.
 

Kajigger

Member
She isn't. The average American doesn't vote because they agree with the candidates views, they vote because blue or red. In addition to that, they vote for whomever they hear about most. Trump is an entertainer, if he wins the nomination, then I'm pretty positive there's a good chance he'll win. BUT, the American voting system isn't exactly fair, so we never know who's gonna win!
 
Why do you keep posting this map? New Hampshire and Virginia are far from sure things, and Iowa/Colorado have consistently been more blue than either one for a while.
New Hampshire is classic Republican but not Neo-Con Republican nor Tea Party Republican.

As long as the GOP continues to veer too far Right, NH will be more comfortable at voting for establishment Hillary
 
She's not. What happened in '08 is starting to happen again.

No where close. Sanders is missing key demographics that Hillary has all but locked up.

You actually think Trump will be the nominee?

$20 paypal says he won't. Any takers?

Of course not. I just found it slightly humorous that your first statement started with Trump will not be the nominee and that your second statement ended with you cannot forecast politics a year in advance.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
Right, so me not liking her because she comes off as arrogant has me calling her a bitch? Uh, ok...for the record, you are implying a lot.



Why can't you want to have both? A likable candidate that also stands for what you want? It doesn't have to be either or. Obama proved that. Hell, the most likable candidate out there isn't even running.

Warren is the best of both worlds, imo.

You're using coded language and haven't said anything of substance besides "she thinks it's her turn so I'll never vote for her!" when you're describing an attribute of almost every single major presidential candidate. Every single political candidate believes they should be president. This is not something that is just a Hillary phenomena. To argue as much shows a naive view of the American political system.

And who the fuck cares if she's likable as long as she's making the correct policy decisions?

How does she come off as arrogant? You keep saying this but is there any actual evidence towards her supposed arrogance compared to any other candidate? Or we're just supposed to believe that Hillary is a power hungry bitch because reasons?
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
Anyone who pays attention to politics knows a couple things:

1) Trump will not be the nominee. He'll flame out. Republicans always play footsy with wackos in the early part of the process. Herman Cain was frontrunner for the 2012 nomination for a time. The republicans will end up with an establishment type pick in the end. Someone like Jeb Bush (not sure if it'll be Jeb or not, but it won't be one of the cartoon characters).

2) Hillary is not guaranteed at all to be the nominee. She is the most likely candidate if you look at it now in 2015, but looking at things now in 2015 is completely pointless. You can't forecast politics a year in advance.

1) What happened in 2012 does not equal what republicans "always" do. Before 2008, Republicans pretty much always knew exactly who they wanted to be the nominee before anyone even announced a campaign. Trump might not be the nominee, but that doesn't mean this will play out like 2012. Endorsements and favorability ratings are the bigger predictors of Trump's fall, but that might be the first time that doesn't matter.

2) It would be completely unprecedented in almost every way if Hillary is not the nominee. The huge lead she has over has never been overcome since poling first became a thing, (Carter v Kennedy being the odd exception, but Bernie isn't the incumbent president). Bernie has the same endorsement problem Trump has, but also has the problem of money and still has to make up a lot of ground. There's a first time for everything, but Bernie is still a very long shot.
 

Jobbs

Banned
No where close. Sanders is missing key demographics that Hillary has all but locked up.



Of course not. I just found it slightly humorous that your first statement started with Trump will not be the nominee and that your second statement ended with you cannot forecast politics a year in advance.

I can forecast a year in advance that a cartoon character won't win. Trump, the brain surgeon who said Obama care is worse than slavery, Herman Cain -- They're all the same and they don't ever win, even though they may poll high with the base at certain points early in the process. Anyone who thinks Trump or anyone else from the "clown car" will get the nomination or even win the general is absolutely crazy and/or just not good at this.

Which of the viable candidates will win isn't something you can be productive in forecasting a year out, though. For all I know it'll be Martin O'Malley or Jim Webb. You just never know at this point.
 

danwarb

Member
She'll have the bigger campaign fund. Ads and framing in news media win votes.


Bernie is who the people need. Hillary is who the wealthiest think they want.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
She isn't. The average American doesn't vote because they agree with the candidates views, they vote because blue or red. In addition to that, they vote for whomever they hear about most. Trump is an entertainer, if he wins the nomination, then I'm pretty positive there's a good chance he'll win. BUT, the American voting system isn't exactly fair, so we never know who's gonna win!

I feel like a broken record but people really need to understand basic civics, in particular the electoral college. The Republicans, and especially Trump, do not fair well under the current system as it stands. It isn't exactly a sure thing for Hillary but it definitely isn't "anyones game" as people are trying to paraphrase it. Hillary has a huge built in advantage against any Republican.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom